大波兰省选定农场的植物保护费用

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.14199/PPP-2020-021
J. Bojarszczuk, J. Podleśny
{"title":"大波兰省选定农场的植物保护费用","authors":"J. Bojarszczuk, J. Podleśny","doi":"10.14199/PPP-2020-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the conducted study was an evaluation of plant protection products consumption and the cost-effectiveness of their usage in the selected farms in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship. The source material was the results of questionnaire surveys carried out in 2017. The study included farms with an arable land (AL) of over 10 ha. Due to analytical purposes the farms were divided into five groups (I–V) depending on the area of arable land: 10–20, 21–30, 31–50, 51–100 and above 100 ha. The amount of chemical plant protection was varied and depended on the farm size and crop species. The highest consumption of plant protection products, expressed in kg of active substance (a.s.) per area unit, characterised winter wheat cultivation (2.34 kg of a.s./ha), corn and mixed wheat was lower by 12 and 13% (respectively 2.06 and 2.03 kg of a.s./ha), and the lowest was cultivation of winter triticale and spring barley (respectively 1.91 and 1.75 kg of a.s./ha). The cultivation of the analysed species had the highest consumption of herbicides, much smaller of fungicides and the smallest of insecticides. The most favourable value of the cost coverage index was obtained in spring barley cultivation in farms with 21–30 ha of arable land (12.9) and corn cultivation in farms with arable land of 31–50 ha (12.9). The highest yield to cover the costs of chemical protection was allocated to the cultivation of winter triticale (average 11.5%), the lowest in the cultivation of winter wheat (8.6%).","PeriodicalId":20625,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Plant Protection","volume":"60 1","pages":"186-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant protection costs in selected farms in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship\",\"authors\":\"J. Bojarszczuk, J. Podleśny\",\"doi\":\"10.14199/PPP-2020-021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the conducted study was an evaluation of plant protection products consumption and the cost-effectiveness of their usage in the selected farms in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship. The source material was the results of questionnaire surveys carried out in 2017. The study included farms with an arable land (AL) of over 10 ha. Due to analytical purposes the farms were divided into five groups (I–V) depending on the area of arable land: 10–20, 21–30, 31–50, 51–100 and above 100 ha. The amount of chemical plant protection was varied and depended on the farm size and crop species. The highest consumption of plant protection products, expressed in kg of active substance (a.s.) per area unit, characterised winter wheat cultivation (2.34 kg of a.s./ha), corn and mixed wheat was lower by 12 and 13% (respectively 2.06 and 2.03 kg of a.s./ha), and the lowest was cultivation of winter triticale and spring barley (respectively 1.91 and 1.75 kg of a.s./ha). The cultivation of the analysed species had the highest consumption of herbicides, much smaller of fungicides and the smallest of insecticides. The most favourable value of the cost coverage index was obtained in spring barley cultivation in farms with 21–30 ha of arable land (12.9) and corn cultivation in farms with arable land of 31–50 ha (12.9). The highest yield to cover the costs of chemical protection was allocated to the cultivation of winter triticale (average 11.5%), the lowest in the cultivation of winter wheat (8.6%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":20625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Plant Protection\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"186-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Plant Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14199/PPP-2020-021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Plant Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14199/PPP-2020-021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所进行研究的目的是评估大波兰省选定农场的植物保护产品消费及其使用的成本效益。资料来源于2017年开展的问卷调查结果。该研究包括耕地(AL)超过10公顷的农场。由于分析目的,根据耕地面积将农场分为五组(I-V): 10-20、21-30、31-50、51-100和100公顷以上。根据农田规模和作物种类的不同,化学植保的用量也不同。植物保护产品的最高消耗,以每面积单位的活性物质kg (a.s.)表示,冬小麦种植(2.34 kg a.s./ha),玉米和混合小麦的消耗分别降低了12%和13%(分别为2.06和2.03 kg a.s./ha),最低的是冬季小黑麦和春大麦的种植(分别为1.91和1.75 kg a.s./ha)。所分析品种的栽培除草剂用量最高,杀菌剂用量少得多,杀虫剂用量最少。耕地面积为21 ~ 30 ha的春大麦种植和耕地面积为31 ~ 50 ha的玉米种植的成本覆盖指数分别为12.9和12.9。与化学防护费用相比,种植冬季小黑麦的产量最高(平均为11.5%),种植冬小麦的产量最低(8.6%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plant protection costs in selected farms in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship
The aim of the conducted study was an evaluation of plant protection products consumption and the cost-effectiveness of their usage in the selected farms in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship. The source material was the results of questionnaire surveys carried out in 2017. The study included farms with an arable land (AL) of over 10 ha. Due to analytical purposes the farms were divided into five groups (I–V) depending on the area of arable land: 10–20, 21–30, 31–50, 51–100 and above 100 ha. The amount of chemical plant protection was varied and depended on the farm size and crop species. The highest consumption of plant protection products, expressed in kg of active substance (a.s.) per area unit, characterised winter wheat cultivation (2.34 kg of a.s./ha), corn and mixed wheat was lower by 12 and 13% (respectively 2.06 and 2.03 kg of a.s./ha), and the lowest was cultivation of winter triticale and spring barley (respectively 1.91 and 1.75 kg of a.s./ha). The cultivation of the analysed species had the highest consumption of herbicides, much smaller of fungicides and the smallest of insecticides. The most favourable value of the cost coverage index was obtained in spring barley cultivation in farms with 21–30 ha of arable land (12.9) and corn cultivation in farms with arable land of 31–50 ha (12.9). The highest yield to cover the costs of chemical protection was allocated to the cultivation of winter triticale (average 11.5%), the lowest in the cultivation of winter wheat (8.6%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Plant Protection
Progress in Plant Protection Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Occurrence of pesticide residues in fruit – results of official control (2021) Assessing the potential toxicity for freshwater ecosystem from chemical protection of maize in different soil tillage systems Urban greenery of Gdynia as a habitat for parasitoids of the subfamily Pimplinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Economic evaluation of weed control and nutrition of potato plants with the use of biostimulators Impact of the method of plantation care on weeds on the production and economics results of three cultivars of edible potato
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1