真空混合机牌号对丙烯酸骨水泥拉伸性能的影响

A. Schonning, Carmen Masnita Iusan, M. Rawls, M. Straatsma, P. Wludyka, M. Patney, J. R. Cotton
{"title":"真空混合机牌号对丙烯酸骨水泥拉伸性能的影响","authors":"A. Schonning, Carmen Masnita Iusan, M. Rawls, M. Straatsma, P. Wludyka, M. Patney, J. R. Cotton","doi":"10.1504/IJECB.2011.039948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of vacuum mixer brand is studied on six commercial bone cements, three with prophylactic doses of antibiotics and three without. The modulus of elasticity, ultimate tensile strength, maximum strain, and 0.2% yield strength was analysed. Bone cement specimens were manufactured and tested in accordance with ASTM D638 specifications using three different types of vacuum mixers in an operating room. The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis revealed that a proprietary mixer did not generally outperform the other two mixers for its own cement. It was found that the mixer had a significant effect on the results and that the Stryker/Simplex mixer generally outperformed Biomet and Zimmer. However, for the Simplex bone cement, the mixer type did not have a significant effect for most of the data analysed. The overall conclusion is that the proprietary mixer does not perform the best with its own cement.","PeriodicalId":90184,"journal":{"name":"International journal of experimental and computational biomechanics","volume":"1 1","pages":"381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJECB.2011.039948","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of vacuum mixer brand on tensile properties of acrylic bone cement\",\"authors\":\"A. Schonning, Carmen Masnita Iusan, M. Rawls, M. Straatsma, P. Wludyka, M. Patney, J. R. Cotton\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJECB.2011.039948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effect of vacuum mixer brand is studied on six commercial bone cements, three with prophylactic doses of antibiotics and three without. The modulus of elasticity, ultimate tensile strength, maximum strain, and 0.2% yield strength was analysed. Bone cement specimens were manufactured and tested in accordance with ASTM D638 specifications using three different types of vacuum mixers in an operating room. The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis revealed that a proprietary mixer did not generally outperform the other two mixers for its own cement. It was found that the mixer had a significant effect on the results and that the Stryker/Simplex mixer generally outperformed Biomet and Zimmer. However, for the Simplex bone cement, the mixer type did not have a significant effect for most of the data analysed. The overall conclusion is that the proprietary mixer does not perform the best with its own cement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of experimental and computational biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJECB.2011.039948\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of experimental and computational biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECB.2011.039948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of experimental and computational biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECB.2011.039948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了真空混合器品牌对6种市售骨水泥的影响,其中3种有预防性抗生素剂量,3种没有。分析了弹性模量、极限抗拉强度、最大应变和0.2%屈服强度。骨水泥标本按照ASTM D638规范在手术室使用三种不同类型的真空混合器制作和测试。试样在万能试验机上进行了试验。统计分析表明,一个专有的搅拌器通常不优于其他两个搅拌器为自己的水泥。我们发现混合器对结果有显著的影响,Stryker/Simplex混合器通常优于Biomet和Zimmer。然而,对于单纯形骨水泥,混合器类型对大多数分析数据没有显著影响。总的结论是,专有搅拌机与自己的水泥表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of vacuum mixer brand on tensile properties of acrylic bone cement
The effect of vacuum mixer brand is studied on six commercial bone cements, three with prophylactic doses of antibiotics and three without. The modulus of elasticity, ultimate tensile strength, maximum strain, and 0.2% yield strength was analysed. Bone cement specimens were manufactured and tested in accordance with ASTM D638 specifications using three different types of vacuum mixers in an operating room. The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis revealed that a proprietary mixer did not generally outperform the other two mixers for its own cement. It was found that the mixer had a significant effect on the results and that the Stryker/Simplex mixer generally outperformed Biomet and Zimmer. However, for the Simplex bone cement, the mixer type did not have a significant effect for most of the data analysed. The overall conclusion is that the proprietary mixer does not perform the best with its own cement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Model for the Roles of Actin and Myosin in Adjustable Preload Tension and Acute Length Adaption Finite element analysis for knee implants with suitable material combinations Non-Newtonian blood flow and coupled blood-wall oxygen mass transport in a 180° curved artery Effects of athletic footwear on plantar force during rope skipping Analysis on the gait of lower limbs in different walking speed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1