植物社会学教育背景下植物覆盖度视觉估计的误差

IF 0.7 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1515/cdem-2016-0006
D. Chmura, Anna Salachna
{"title":"植物社会学教育背景下植物覆盖度视觉估计的误差","authors":"D. Chmura, Anna Salachna","doi":"10.1515/cdem-2016-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In vegetation science including phytosociology, visual estimates of plant cover and point method belong to the common field method to record species composition and their abundance. Two methods were compared: Braun-Blanquet scale and point method using Levy bridge. A group of students performed measurements in five plots belonged to an oak-hornbeam forest Tilio-Carpinetum. It was revealed that there is a very high discrepancy in a observed number of species. Total mean numbers obtained are 13.4 and 31.2 for point method and Braun-Blanquet method respectively. However, there is the significant positive and medium correlation between two methods in terms of estimation of abundance of species. It can be concluded that point-method is not suitable for study of forest floor vegetation. It can be merged with other methods. Due to many repetitive measures, it can be helpful in learning of recognition of species.","PeriodicalId":41079,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology","volume":"464 1","pages":"75 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Errors in Visual Estimation of Plants Cover in the Context of Education of Phytosociology\",\"authors\":\"D. Chmura, Anna Salachna\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cdem-2016-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In vegetation science including phytosociology, visual estimates of plant cover and point method belong to the common field method to record species composition and their abundance. Two methods were compared: Braun-Blanquet scale and point method using Levy bridge. A group of students performed measurements in five plots belonged to an oak-hornbeam forest Tilio-Carpinetum. It was revealed that there is a very high discrepancy in a observed number of species. Total mean numbers obtained are 13.4 and 31.2 for point method and Braun-Blanquet method respectively. However, there is the significant positive and medium correlation between two methods in terms of estimation of abundance of species. It can be concluded that point-method is not suitable for study of forest floor vegetation. It can be merged with other methods. Due to many repetitive measures, it can be helpful in learning of recognition of species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology\",\"volume\":\"464 1\",\"pages\":\"75 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdem-2016-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdem-2016-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在包括植物社会学在内的植被科学中,植物覆盖度目测法和点法是记录物种组成和丰度的常用野外方法。比较了两种方法:Braun-Blanquet比例尺和Levy bridge点法。一组学生在属于tilo - carpinetum橡树角梁森林的五个地块上进行了测量。结果表明,在观测到的物种数量上存在着很大的差异。点法和布朗-布兰凯法得到的总平均值分别为13.4和31.2。然而,两种方法在物种丰度估计方面存在显著的正相关和中等相关。因此,点法不适合用于森林地表植被的研究。它可以与其他方法合并。由于有许多重复的测量,它可以帮助学习物种的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Errors in Visual Estimation of Plants Cover in the Context of Education of Phytosociology
Abstract In vegetation science including phytosociology, visual estimates of plant cover and point method belong to the common field method to record species composition and their abundance. Two methods were compared: Braun-Blanquet scale and point method using Levy bridge. A group of students performed measurements in five plots belonged to an oak-hornbeam forest Tilio-Carpinetum. It was revealed that there is a very high discrepancy in a observed number of species. Total mean numbers obtained are 13.4 and 31.2 for point method and Braun-Blanquet method respectively. However, there is the significant positive and medium correlation between two methods in terms of estimation of abundance of species. It can be concluded that point-method is not suitable for study of forest floor vegetation. It can be merged with other methods. Due to many repetitive measures, it can be helpful in learning of recognition of species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology
Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
“Covid-19 Shock” and Identified Benefits for Improved Pre-Service Chemistry Teacher Education Renewable Energy and Sustainable Digitalisation: Challenges for Europe Experiments Safety - The State of Art at Schools in Czechia Microwave-Aided Reactions of Aniline Derivatives with Formic Acid: Inquiry-Based Learning Experiments 2,3-Dihydro-Quinazolin-4(1H)-One as a Fluorescent Sensor for Hg2+ Ion and its Docking Studies in Cancer Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1