{"title":"乔姆斯基的普遍语法:以其政府概念/约束理论为例","authors":"Y. Harsono","doi":"10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to see the universality of the Government/Binding Theory in its concepts of government, the pro-drop parameter, and binding theory. Three languages English, Indonesian, and Javanese are analyzed based on the three concepts. From the analysis it is concluded that in some cases language is universal, but in some other cases every language is specific.","PeriodicalId":37036,"journal":{"name":"Teflin Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"210-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chomsky's Universal Grammar: A Case of Its Concepts of Government/Binding Theory\",\"authors\":\"Y. Harsono\",\"doi\":\"10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to see the universality of the Government/Binding Theory in its concepts of government, the pro-drop parameter, and binding theory. Three languages English, Indonesian, and Javanese are analyzed based on the three concepts. From the analysis it is concluded that in some cases language is universal, but in some other cases every language is specific.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teflin Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"210-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teflin Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teflin Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chomsky's Universal Grammar: A Case of Its Concepts of Government/Binding Theory
The purpose of this paper is to see the universality of the Government/Binding Theory in its concepts of government, the pro-drop parameter, and binding theory. Three languages English, Indonesian, and Javanese are analyzed based on the three concepts. From the analysis it is concluded that in some cases language is universal, but in some other cases every language is specific.