教师眼中小学生国家统考的后果

Q4 Social Sciences New Educational Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15804/tner.2022.70.4.06
M. Brozmanová, Beata Kosová
{"title":"教师眼中小学生国家统考的后果","authors":"M. Brozmanová, Beata Kosová","doi":"10.15804/tner.2022.70.4.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study deals with the consequences of national testing at the primary school level on the processes of education, teachers’ work in the classroom and the teaching profession. It is based on the international discourse about the consequences of large-scale testing and investigates Slovak teachers’ opinions and measures they have implemented under the influence of testing in their own instruction and school. The research, carried out by the questionnaire method on a sample of 786 (2017) and 940 (2020) respondents, confirms that teachers perceive national testing as too far from instruction and inconsistent with educational standards. They do not believe it can fulfil the set goals, but, on the other hand, because of it, they narrow down instruction to prepare for tests and take measures that do not change the quality of pupil learning.","PeriodicalId":19430,"journal":{"name":"New Educational Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consequences of National Testing of Primary School Pupils Through the Eyes of Teachers\",\"authors\":\"M. Brozmanová, Beata Kosová\",\"doi\":\"10.15804/tner.2022.70.4.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study deals with the consequences of national testing at the primary school level on the processes of education, teachers’ work in the classroom and the teaching profession. It is based on the international discourse about the consequences of large-scale testing and investigates Slovak teachers’ opinions and measures they have implemented under the influence of testing in their own instruction and school. The research, carried out by the questionnaire method on a sample of 786 (2017) and 940 (2020) respondents, confirms that teachers perceive national testing as too far from instruction and inconsistent with educational standards. They do not believe it can fulfil the set goals, but, on the other hand, because of it, they narrow down instruction to prepare for tests and take measures that do not change the quality of pupil learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Educational Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Educational Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2022.70.4.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2022.70.4.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究涉及小学一级国家考试对教育过程、教师在课堂上的工作和教学职业的影响。它基于关于大规模考试后果的国际讨论,并调查了斯洛伐克教师在自己的教学和学校中受考试影响所采取的意见和措施。该研究通过问卷调查的方式对786名(2017年)和940名(2020年)受访者进行了调查,证实了教师认为国家考试与教学脱节,与教育标准不一致。他们不相信它能实现既定目标,但另一方面,由于它,他们缩小了教学范围,为考试做准备,并采取了不改变学生学习质量的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consequences of National Testing of Primary School Pupils Through the Eyes of Teachers
The study deals with the consequences of national testing at the primary school level on the processes of education, teachers’ work in the classroom and the teaching profession. It is based on the international discourse about the consequences of large-scale testing and investigates Slovak teachers’ opinions and measures they have implemented under the influence of testing in their own instruction and school. The research, carried out by the questionnaire method on a sample of 786 (2017) and 940 (2020) respondents, confirms that teachers perceive national testing as too far from instruction and inconsistent with educational standards. They do not believe it can fulfil the set goals, but, on the other hand, because of it, they narrow down instruction to prepare for tests and take measures that do not change the quality of pupil learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Educational Review
New Educational Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The New Educational Review is a journal that has been founded by the faculties of education from the following universities: University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland), Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica (Slovak Republic) and University of Ostrava (Czech Republic). The deans and vice-deans of the pedagogical faculties of the universities mentioned above create associate Editors board. The main seat of editorial board is placed at the Faculty of Education and Psychology in University of Silesia in Poland.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Verification of the Effectiveness of the Pedagogical System of the Formation of Educational Environment in a Higher Educational Institution Blended Learning: How Can Multimedia Enhance Students’ Characters? Teacher-Student-Environment Interactions in Fieldwork Through 360-Degree Camera School Belonging in Online Instruction: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Relationships with Academic Adjustment in Higher Education Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic A UK Study of Thinking and Language Expression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1