对国家高中考试(ENEM)简单因子负荷假设的不利证据

Q4 Psychology Avaliacao Psicologica Pub Date : 2021-08-15 DOI:10.15689/ap.2021.2003.15777.05
C. M. A. Gomes, H. Golino, Alexandre José de Souza Peres
{"title":"对国家高中考试(ENEM)简单因子负荷假设的不利证据","authors":"C. M. A. Gomes, H. Golino, Alexandre José de Souza Peres","doi":"10.15689/ap.2021.2003.15777.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence Contrary to the Assumption of Simple Factor Loadings of the National High School Education Exam (ENEM) The National High School Examination (ENEM) has a restricted measurement model characterized by the assumption that the marker items in each domain are exclusively linked to their target domain. Previous studies suggest, through indirect evidence, that this model may not be valid. However, this postulate has not yet been directly assessed. In this study, this assumption was investigated through factor analysis of the items of the ENEM 2011 edition. Two models were tested. The first, called Thurstone's simple structure, represents the measurement model of the ENEM. The second, of crossed loadings, refute this model. The crossed loadings model was the only one that presented a good fit to the data according to all the indices employed. The evidence found is unfavorable for the assumption of simple factor loadings of the measurement model of the ENEM, indicating issues of validity and in the quality of the scores produced.","PeriodicalId":37995,"journal":{"name":"Avaliacao Psicologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidências Desfavoráveis ao Postulado de Cargas Fatoriais Simples do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM)\",\"authors\":\"C. M. A. Gomes, H. Golino, Alexandre José de Souza Peres\",\"doi\":\"10.15689/ap.2021.2003.15777.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence Contrary to the Assumption of Simple Factor Loadings of the National High School Education Exam (ENEM) The National High School Examination (ENEM) has a restricted measurement model characterized by the assumption that the marker items in each domain are exclusively linked to their target domain. Previous studies suggest, through indirect evidence, that this model may not be valid. However, this postulate has not yet been directly assessed. In this study, this assumption was investigated through factor analysis of the items of the ENEM 2011 edition. Two models were tested. The first, called Thurstone's simple structure, represents the measurement model of the ENEM. The second, of crossed loadings, refute this model. The crossed loadings model was the only one that presented a good fit to the data according to all the indices employed. The evidence found is unfavorable for the assumption of simple factor loadings of the measurement model of the ENEM, indicating issues of validity and in the quality of the scores produced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avaliacao Psicologica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avaliacao Psicologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2021.2003.15777.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avaliacao Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2021.2003.15777.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

与国家高中教育考试(ENEM)简单因素负荷假设相反的证据国家高中教育考试(ENEM)有一个限制性的测量模型,其特征是假设每个领域的标记项目都与目标领域完全相关。以前的研究通过间接证据表明,这个模型可能是无效的。然而,这一假设尚未得到直接评估。在本研究中,通过因子分析的ENEM 2011版的项目来调查这一假设。测试了两个模型。第一个是Thurstone的简单结构,它代表了ENEM的测量模型。第二个是交叉装载,反驳了这个模型。根据所采用的所有指标,交叉加载模型是唯一一个与数据拟合良好的模型。发现的证据不利于ENEM测量模型的简单因素负荷假设,表明有效性问题和所产生分数的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidências Desfavoráveis ao Postulado de Cargas Fatoriais Simples do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM)
Evidence Contrary to the Assumption of Simple Factor Loadings of the National High School Education Exam (ENEM) The National High School Examination (ENEM) has a restricted measurement model characterized by the assumption that the marker items in each domain are exclusively linked to their target domain. Previous studies suggest, through indirect evidence, that this model may not be valid. However, this postulate has not yet been directly assessed. In this study, this assumption was investigated through factor analysis of the items of the ENEM 2011 edition. Two models were tested. The first, called Thurstone's simple structure, represents the measurement model of the ENEM. The second, of crossed loadings, refute this model. The crossed loadings model was the only one that presented a good fit to the data according to all the indices employed. The evidence found is unfavorable for the assumption of simple factor loadings of the measurement model of the ENEM, indicating issues of validity and in the quality of the scores produced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Avaliacao Psicologica
Avaliacao Psicologica Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Avaliação Psicológica - Official Publication of the Brazilian Institute of Psychological Assessment (IBAP). This journal is a quarterly publication, it is also a vehicle for the dissemination of scientific Ibero-American area of psychological and educational assessment. Its objective is to divulge the advances of the theory, searches and practical in the area of the evaluation in Psychology, Education, Counseling, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources and others related disciplines. The publishing process aims to present to the scientific community a text that reflects a significant and actualize contribution. Publishes original papers, preferably research reports, but also the literature review articles, technical notes and short reports of research, book reviews and news on the topic.
期刊最新文献
SON-R 6-40: Dimensionalidade e Validade Convergente com a CMMS, TONI-3 e COM Uma Revisão Integrativa da Literatura sobre os Erros de Percepção Sexual Por Que Regulamentar o Uso e Acesso aos Testes Psicológicos? Publications on personality disorders in Brazilian journals: a narrative review Escala de Avaliação da Autonomia Profissional dos Professores: adaptação e propriedades psicométricas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1