为什么巴西人对枪支管制如此感兴趣?测试多流框架

Q3 Social Sciences Opiniao Publica Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-01912021273730
Diego Sanjurjo
{"title":"为什么巴西人对枪支管制如此感兴趣?测试多流框架","authors":"Diego Sanjurjo","doi":"10.1590/1807-01912021273730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gun control has been a relevant political issue in Brazil for over twenty years. The first goal of this article is to understand and explain this unusual prominence in the political agenda. The second is the empirical verification of a proposed modification for John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework that may allow a more appropriate application to the Latin American context. Findings suggest that proponents of both gun control and gun liberalization were able to exploit the rise in homicides and their close relations to legislators and presidents to couple the streams together and systematically reintroduce the issue in the agenda. The process was marked by the strong influence of opposing interest groups, whereas political parties and public opinion played a secondary role. In consequence, the agenda-setting process mirrored a political stream that acknowledges how legislatures and political parties are frequently weak in Latin America, while special interests can have a major influence over executives that dominate policymaking.","PeriodicalId":35314,"journal":{"name":"Opiniao Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why are Brazilians so interested in gun control? Putting the Multiple Streams Framework to the test\",\"authors\":\"Diego Sanjurjo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-01912021273730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gun control has been a relevant political issue in Brazil for over twenty years. The first goal of this article is to understand and explain this unusual prominence in the political agenda. The second is the empirical verification of a proposed modification for John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework that may allow a more appropriate application to the Latin American context. Findings suggest that proponents of both gun control and gun liberalization were able to exploit the rise in homicides and their close relations to legislators and presidents to couple the streams together and systematically reintroduce the issue in the agenda. The process was marked by the strong influence of opposing interest groups, whereas political parties and public opinion played a secondary role. In consequence, the agenda-setting process mirrored a political stream that acknowledges how legislatures and political parties are frequently weak in Latin America, while special interests can have a major influence over executives that dominate policymaking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Opiniao Publica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Opiniao Publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912021273730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opiniao Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912021273730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20多年来,枪支管制一直是巴西的一个相关政治问题。本文的第一个目标是理解和解释政治议程中这种不寻常的突出。第二部分是对John Kingdon的多流框架提出的修改进行实证验证,该修改可能更适合于拉丁美洲的背景。调查结果表明,枪支管制和枪支自由化的支持者都能够利用凶杀案的上升以及他们与立法者和总统的密切关系,将这两种趋势结合在一起,并系统地将这一问题重新纳入议程。这一过程的特点是对立利益集团的强大影响力,而政党和公众舆论则起着次要作用。因此,议程设定过程反映了一种政治潮流,即承认拉丁美洲的立法机构和政党往往很弱,而特殊利益集团可以对主导决策的高管产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why are Brazilians so interested in gun control? Putting the Multiple Streams Framework to the test
Gun control has been a relevant political issue in Brazil for over twenty years. The first goal of this article is to understand and explain this unusual prominence in the political agenda. The second is the empirical verification of a proposed modification for John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework that may allow a more appropriate application to the Latin American context. Findings suggest that proponents of both gun control and gun liberalization were able to exploit the rise in homicides and their close relations to legislators and presidents to couple the streams together and systematically reintroduce the issue in the agenda. The process was marked by the strong influence of opposing interest groups, whereas political parties and public opinion played a secondary role. In consequence, the agenda-setting process mirrored a political stream that acknowledges how legislatures and political parties are frequently weak in Latin America, while special interests can have a major influence over executives that dominate policymaking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Opiniao Publica
Opiniao Publica Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Opinião Pública is quadrimestral publication of the Center for Studies on Public Opinion (CESOP) of the University fo Campinas, Brazil Created in 1993, its main objective is to establish a specialized academic vehicle to publish articles about theory and methodology in the field of public opinion, political and social behavior, and midia studies
期刊最新文献
Tropical Trump, or a very Brazilian tale? Social class resentment as a moderating factor between anti-PT sentiment and the vote for Jair Bolsonaro in 2018 Eleições municipais de 2016 e 2020 em São Paulo: resultados diferentes, alinhamentos iguais 30 anos de direitos da criança e do adolescente: uma análise da trajetória da política pública no Brasil Polarização política dinâmica: evidências do Brasil , Imagem e contestação: regimes emocionais no enquadramento midiático a eventos de protesto
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1