人性化与永久健康教育支持实践分析

Q3 Social Sciences Paideia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1982-4327e3208
C. M. Fortuna, A. Feliciano, Mônica Vilchez da Silva, Maristel Kasper, Angelina Lettiere-Viana, Karen da Silva Santos
{"title":"人性化与永久健康教育支持实践分析","authors":"C. M. Fortuna, A. Feliciano, Mônica Vilchez da Silva, Maristel Kasper, Angelina Lettiere-Viana, Karen da Silva Santos","doi":"10.1590/1982-4327e3208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The National Policies of Humanization and Permanent Health Education (PHE) have shown advances and setbacks in their historical process. Some concepts from the theoretical framework of institutional analysis can contribute in these themes, such as the concept of analyzer. This article discusses the analyzers identified in an intervention research with professionals who work as supporters of humanization and/or articulators of PHE in municipalities of the state of São Paulo. The theoretical-methodological framework is the institutional analysis, socio-clinical line, focusing on the work of the analyzers. The intervention groups were composed of 30 participants. We highlight three analyzers: (1) the COVID-19 historical analyzer; (2) the time analyzer; (3) the silence analyzer. These analyzers evidence tensions such as: the peripheral place of primary care, discomfort in the face of “not knowing” and/or lethargy in the face of imposed non-doing, and the paradox of creating and interrupting both care actions and support for the teams.","PeriodicalId":38841,"journal":{"name":"Paideia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzers of Support Practices in Humanization and Permanent Health Education\",\"authors\":\"C. M. Fortuna, A. Feliciano, Mônica Vilchez da Silva, Maristel Kasper, Angelina Lettiere-Viana, Karen da Silva Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1982-4327e3208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The National Policies of Humanization and Permanent Health Education (PHE) have shown advances and setbacks in their historical process. Some concepts from the theoretical framework of institutional analysis can contribute in these themes, such as the concept of analyzer. This article discusses the analyzers identified in an intervention research with professionals who work as supporters of humanization and/or articulators of PHE in municipalities of the state of São Paulo. The theoretical-methodological framework is the institutional analysis, socio-clinical line, focusing on the work of the analyzers. The intervention groups were composed of 30 participants. We highlight three analyzers: (1) the COVID-19 historical analyzer; (2) the time analyzer; (3) the silence analyzer. These analyzers evidence tensions such as: the peripheral place of primary care, discomfort in the face of “not knowing” and/or lethargy in the face of imposed non-doing, and the paradox of creating and interrupting both care actions and support for the teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paideia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paideia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paideia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要人性化国家政策和终身健康教育在其历史进程中既有进步,也有挫折。制度分析理论框架中的一些概念可以为这些主题做出贡献,例如分析者的概念。本文讨论了在干预研究中确定的分析人员,这些分析人员是圣保罗州市政当局人性化和/或公共卫生部门的支持者。理论-方法框架是制度分析,社会-临床路线,关注分析者的工作。干预组由30名参与者组成。我们重点介绍了三种分析仪:(1)COVID-19历史分析仪;(2)时间分析器;(3)静音分析仪。这些分析者证明了紧张关系,如:初级保健的外围位置,面对“不知道”时的不适和/或面对强制不作为时的麻木,以及创造和中断护理行动和对团队的支持的悖论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzers of Support Practices in Humanization and Permanent Health Education
Abstract The National Policies of Humanization and Permanent Health Education (PHE) have shown advances and setbacks in their historical process. Some concepts from the theoretical framework of institutional analysis can contribute in these themes, such as the concept of analyzer. This article discusses the analyzers identified in an intervention research with professionals who work as supporters of humanization and/or articulators of PHE in municipalities of the state of São Paulo. The theoretical-methodological framework is the institutional analysis, socio-clinical line, focusing on the work of the analyzers. The intervention groups were composed of 30 participants. We highlight three analyzers: (1) the COVID-19 historical analyzer; (2) the time analyzer; (3) the silence analyzer. These analyzers evidence tensions such as: the peripheral place of primary care, discomfort in the face of “not knowing” and/or lethargy in the face of imposed non-doing, and the paradox of creating and interrupting both care actions and support for the teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Paideia
Paideia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Substance Use Disorder Among Bereaved Individuals: A Systematic Review Morbidities, Self-reported Health, Purpose, and Satisfaction with Life in Older Adults Comparison of Female Body Image Between Models and Non-Models Women Evidence of Validity for the Hierarchical Job Crafting Scale in Brazil Children and Adolescents with Depression: Perception of Family Caregivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1