战略地位与工会力量:阿根廷汽车、化工和食用油行业工会战略分析(2003-2015)

IF 1.3 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Global Labour Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.15173/glj.v13i3.4929
Clara Marticorena, Lucila D’Urso
{"title":"战略地位与工会力量:阿根廷汽车、化工和食用油行业工会战略分析(2003-2015)","authors":"Clara Marticorena, Lucila D’Urso","doi":"10.15173/glj.v13i3.4929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to analyse empirically the importance of union strategies as a moderating variable between unions’ structural and associational power and their bargaining and mobilisation power. To this end, we selected three unions, one from each of three strategic industrial sectors in the Argentinian national economy – automotive, chemical and edible oils – and analysed their dynamics of collective bargaining and labour conflict in the 2003–2015 period. The research is based on a review of secondary sources (collective bargaining agreements and conflict databases) as well as primary sources (semi-structured interviews with managers, trade union leaders, worker representatives and activists). Whereas workers in each of these sectors have a similarly high degree of structural power, we observed differences among the sectors in working, wage and organisational conditions. These differences are associated with three different union strategies for building union power, which we identify as partnership, confrontational and combative.            \nKEYWORDS: strategic position; trade union power; union strategies; sectoral analysis; Argentina","PeriodicalId":44737,"journal":{"name":"Global Labour Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Position and Trade Union Power: An Analysis of Trade Union Strategies in the Automotive, Chemical and Edible Oil Sectors in Argentina, 2003-2015)\",\"authors\":\"Clara Marticorena, Lucila D’Urso\",\"doi\":\"10.15173/glj.v13i3.4929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to analyse empirically the importance of union strategies as a moderating variable between unions’ structural and associational power and their bargaining and mobilisation power. To this end, we selected three unions, one from each of three strategic industrial sectors in the Argentinian national economy – automotive, chemical and edible oils – and analysed their dynamics of collective bargaining and labour conflict in the 2003–2015 period. The research is based on a review of secondary sources (collective bargaining agreements and conflict databases) as well as primary sources (semi-structured interviews with managers, trade union leaders, worker representatives and activists). Whereas workers in each of these sectors have a similarly high degree of structural power, we observed differences among the sectors in working, wage and organisational conditions. These differences are associated with three different union strategies for building union power, which we identify as partnership, confrontational and combative.            \\nKEYWORDS: strategic position; trade union power; union strategies; sectoral analysis; Argentina\",\"PeriodicalId\":44737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Labour Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Labour Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v13i3.4929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Labour Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v13i3.4929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是实证分析工会战略作为工会结构和联合权力与其议价和动员能力之间的调节变量的重要性。为此,我们选择了三个工会,分别来自阿根廷国民经济的三个战略工业部门——汽车、化工和食用油——并分析了它们在2003-2015年期间集体谈判和劳资冲突的动态。这项研究基于对二手资料来源(集体谈判协议和冲突数据库)以及一手资料来源(对管理人员、工会领导人、工人代表和积极分子的半结构化访谈)的审查。虽然这些部门的工人都有类似的高度结构性权力,但我们观察到部门之间在工作、工资和组织条件方面存在差异。这些差异与建立工会权力的三种不同的工会策略有关,我们将其定义为伙伴关系、对抗性和战斗性。关键词:战略定位;工会力量;联盟策略;行业分析;阿根廷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategic Position and Trade Union Power: An Analysis of Trade Union Strategies in the Automotive, Chemical and Edible Oil Sectors in Argentina, 2003-2015)
The aim of this paper is to analyse empirically the importance of union strategies as a moderating variable between unions’ structural and associational power and their bargaining and mobilisation power. To this end, we selected three unions, one from each of three strategic industrial sectors in the Argentinian national economy – automotive, chemical and edible oils – and analysed their dynamics of collective bargaining and labour conflict in the 2003–2015 period. The research is based on a review of secondary sources (collective bargaining agreements and conflict databases) as well as primary sources (semi-structured interviews with managers, trade union leaders, worker representatives and activists). Whereas workers in each of these sectors have a similarly high degree of structural power, we observed differences among the sectors in working, wage and organisational conditions. These differences are associated with three different union strategies for building union power, which we identify as partnership, confrontational and combative.             KEYWORDS: strategic position; trade union power; union strategies; sectoral analysis; Argentina
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Labour Journal
Global Labour Journal INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
26
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of Supriya RoyChowdhury (2021) City of Shadows: Slums and Informal Work in Bangalore Racial Capitalism and Global Labour Studies – a Missed Encounter ? Precarious Associational Power Editorial: Going Against the Grain: Our Commitment to Truly Global Labour Studies Pandemic Necrolabour and Essential Workers in the UK and France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1