保加利亚耕地土壤植物速效钾测定土壤试验方法的比较研究

Q4 Chemistry Analitika i Kontrol Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.15826/analitika.2021.25.3.001
L. Angelova, N. Genova, S. Stoyanova, O. Surleva, I.-H. Nekov, D. Ilieva, A. Surleva
{"title":"保加利亚耕地土壤植物速效钾测定土壤试验方法的比较研究","authors":"L. Angelova, N. Genova, S. Stoyanova, O. Surleva, I.-H. Nekov, D. Ilieva, A. Surleva","doi":"10.15826/analitika.2021.25.3.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comparative study was aimed at estimating analytical behavior of methods for determination of plant available potassium applied to Bulgarian arable soils and to reveal the relationship between the amount of extractable K. Twenty-four samples from two traditional agricultural regions in Bulgaria were studied. Soil potassium was extracted by NH4OAc/HOAc pH 4.5 (AA), diluted double acid (Mehlich 1), CaCl2, BaCl2 and a modified acetate/lactate method (ALM) and determined by Flame AES. The factors influencing the methods accuracy were identified and uncertainty was estimated. The expanded uncertainty was (in mg K2O (100 g dry soil)-1): 0.10 (ALM), 0.64 (Mehlich 1), 0.17 (CaCl2) and 1.1 (AA). The study revealed that the factor which mainly influence the uncertainty of the applied analytical methods for plant available potassium in soil was the calibration of Flame AES determination. The obtained results showed that extractable potassium lowered in the following order . Soil potassium extracted by ALM procedure correlated with AA, BaCl2-K, CaCl2 –K and Mehlich 1 - K at 0.05 level of significance. ALM extracted between 1.2 to 5.8 times more soil K than other methods did. The obtained results provided a base for further study on correlation between extractable K and soil fertility indices for particular soil types and climatic regions in Bulgaria.","PeriodicalId":37743,"journal":{"name":"Analitika i Kontrol","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of soil test methods for determination of plant available potassium in Bulgarian arable soils\",\"authors\":\"L. Angelova, N. Genova, S. Stoyanova, O. Surleva, I.-H. Nekov, D. Ilieva, A. Surleva\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/analitika.2021.25.3.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This comparative study was aimed at estimating analytical behavior of methods for determination of plant available potassium applied to Bulgarian arable soils and to reveal the relationship between the amount of extractable K. Twenty-four samples from two traditional agricultural regions in Bulgaria were studied. Soil potassium was extracted by NH4OAc/HOAc pH 4.5 (AA), diluted double acid (Mehlich 1), CaCl2, BaCl2 and a modified acetate/lactate method (ALM) and determined by Flame AES. The factors influencing the methods accuracy were identified and uncertainty was estimated. The expanded uncertainty was (in mg K2O (100 g dry soil)-1): 0.10 (ALM), 0.64 (Mehlich 1), 0.17 (CaCl2) and 1.1 (AA). The study revealed that the factor which mainly influence the uncertainty of the applied analytical methods for plant available potassium in soil was the calibration of Flame AES determination. The obtained results showed that extractable potassium lowered in the following order . Soil potassium extracted by ALM procedure correlated with AA, BaCl2-K, CaCl2 –K and Mehlich 1 - K at 0.05 level of significance. ALM extracted between 1.2 to 5.8 times more soil K than other methods did. The obtained results provided a base for further study on correlation between extractable K and soil fertility indices for particular soil types and climatic regions in Bulgaria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analitika i Kontrol\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analitika i Kontrol\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/analitika.2021.25.3.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analitika i Kontrol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/analitika.2021.25.3.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项比较研究的目的是估计用于测定保加利亚耕地土壤的植物有效钾的方法的分析行为,并揭示可提取钾的量之间的关系。来自保加利亚两个传统农业区的24个样本进行了研究。采用NH4OAc/HOAc pH值为4.5 (AA)、稀释双酸(Mehlich 1)、CaCl2、BaCl2和改进的醋酸/乳酸法(ALM)提取土壤钾,火焰AES法测定土壤钾含量。确定了影响方法准确度的因素,并对不确定度进行了估计。扩展不确定度(mg K2O (100 g干土)-1):ALM(0.10)、Mehlich 1(0.64)、CaCl2(0.17)和AA(1.1)。研究表明,影响土壤中植物速效钾测定方法不确定度的主要因素是火焰原子发射光谱法的定标。结果表明,可提取钾含量依次降低。ALM法提取的土壤钾与AA、BaCl2-K、CaCl2 -K和Mehlich 1 -K的相关性在0.05水平上显著。ALM提取的土壤钾含量是其他方法的1.2 ~ 5.8倍。所得结果为进一步研究保加利亚特定土壤类型和气候区域可提取钾与土壤肥力指标之间的相关性提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of soil test methods for determination of plant available potassium in Bulgarian arable soils
This comparative study was aimed at estimating analytical behavior of methods for determination of plant available potassium applied to Bulgarian arable soils and to reveal the relationship between the amount of extractable K. Twenty-four samples from two traditional agricultural regions in Bulgaria were studied. Soil potassium was extracted by NH4OAc/HOAc pH 4.5 (AA), diluted double acid (Mehlich 1), CaCl2, BaCl2 and a modified acetate/lactate method (ALM) and determined by Flame AES. The factors influencing the methods accuracy were identified and uncertainty was estimated. The expanded uncertainty was (in mg K2O (100 g dry soil)-1): 0.10 (ALM), 0.64 (Mehlich 1), 0.17 (CaCl2) and 1.1 (AA). The study revealed that the factor which mainly influence the uncertainty of the applied analytical methods for plant available potassium in soil was the calibration of Flame AES determination. The obtained results showed that extractable potassium lowered in the following order . Soil potassium extracted by ALM procedure correlated with AA, BaCl2-K, CaCl2 –K and Mehlich 1 - K at 0.05 level of significance. ALM extracted between 1.2 to 5.8 times more soil K than other methods did. The obtained results provided a base for further study on correlation between extractable K and soil fertility indices for particular soil types and climatic regions in Bulgaria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analitika i Kontrol
Analitika i Kontrol Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Analitika i Kontrol is a scientific journal covering theoretical and applied aspects of analytical chemistry and analytical control, published since autumn 1997. Founder and publisher of the journal is the Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia Boris Yeltsin (UrFU, Ekaterinburg).
期刊最新文献
Electrophoretic determination of carboxylic acids in blood serum with intracapillary concentration Fluorescence of anisotropic primary X-ray radiation Selection of the parameters of a multicapillary column for portable gas analyzers by Kovach indices Differentiation of oil samples by isomeric composition of paraffins using cluster analysis methods Important features of retention indices determination in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1