“不仅要做好事,还要做好事”:对民间组织和社会管理模式的反思

Cláudia Tirelli
{"title":"“不仅要做好事,还要做好事”:对民间组织和社会管理模式的反思","authors":"Cláudia Tirelli","doi":"10.15210/PP.V0I11.3619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the concepts developed by the so-called american \"contentious politics\" and studies of James Scott about \"public transcript e hidden trascript”, the article discusses some recent theses presented by the literature on civil society and democracy in Brazil, which have interpreted the use of planning tools and management by civil organizations as indicators of processes of hegemony by a neoliberal political project or colonization by actors and methodologies of the market and/or the State. Partial results of a survey conducted among the organizations that joined the state program “Rede Parceria Social” between 2008 and 2010 reinforce criticism to these theses, in that it showed the extreme heterogeneity of civil organizations working in the area of assistance in RS, which lead them to interpret and appropriate in a distinct form the political opportunities.","PeriodicalId":30291,"journal":{"name":"Pensamento Plural","volume":"1 1","pages":"131-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Não somente fazer o Bem, fazer bem”: uma reflexão sobre as organizações civis e os modelos de gestão do social\",\"authors\":\"Cláudia Tirelli\",\"doi\":\"10.15210/PP.V0I11.3619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the concepts developed by the so-called american \\\"contentious politics\\\" and studies of James Scott about \\\"public transcript e hidden trascript”, the article discusses some recent theses presented by the literature on civil society and democracy in Brazil, which have interpreted the use of planning tools and management by civil organizations as indicators of processes of hegemony by a neoliberal political project or colonization by actors and methodologies of the market and/or the State. Partial results of a survey conducted among the organizations that joined the state program “Rede Parceria Social” between 2008 and 2010 reinforce criticism to these theses, in that it showed the extreme heterogeneity of civil organizations working in the area of assistance in RS, which lead them to interpret and appropriate in a distinct form the political opportunities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pensamento Plural\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"131-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pensamento Plural\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15210/PP.V0I11.3619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensamento Plural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15210/PP.V0I11.3619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以美国所谓“争议政治”的概念和詹姆斯·斯科特关于“公开记录和隐藏记录”的研究为基础,讨论了近年来有关巴西公民社会与民主的一些文献论文。他们将计划工具的使用和民间组织的管理解释为新自由主义政治项目的霸权进程或市场和/或国家的行为者和方法的殖民化进程的指标。在2008年至2010年期间加入国家项目“社会福利”的组织中进行的一项调查的部分结果加强了对这些论点的批评,因为它显示了在RS援助领域工作的民间组织的极端异质性,这导致他们以独特的形式解释和利用政治机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Não somente fazer o Bem, fazer bem”: uma reflexão sobre as organizações civis e os modelos de gestão do social
Based on the concepts developed by the so-called american "contentious politics" and studies of James Scott about "public transcript e hidden trascript”, the article discusses some recent theses presented by the literature on civil society and democracy in Brazil, which have interpreted the use of planning tools and management by civil organizations as indicators of processes of hegemony by a neoliberal political project or colonization by actors and methodologies of the market and/or the State. Partial results of a survey conducted among the organizations that joined the state program “Rede Parceria Social” between 2008 and 2010 reinforce criticism to these theses, in that it showed the extreme heterogeneity of civil organizations working in the area of assistance in RS, which lead them to interpret and appropriate in a distinct form the political opportunities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
VITULLO, Gabriel Eduardo. As Outras teorias da democracia: participacionismo, deliberacionismo e republicanismo cívico. Natal: EDUFRN, 2012. Feminismo, reconhecimento e mulheres trans*: expressões online de tensões Patriarcado e formação do Brasil: uma leitura feminista de Oliveira Vianna e Sérgio Buarque de Holanda Fronteira ou horizonte? Comparando o conceito de "razão" nas tradições liberal e republicana De situação a oposição: a reforma da Previdência do governo Lula a partir da perspectiva dos deputados do PSDB
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1