区域一体化的空间(或缺乏):拉丁美洲制度分裂的结构性原因(1991-2019)

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0034-7329202200111
J. C. Rodriguez, V. Haag
{"title":"区域一体化的空间(或缺乏):拉丁美洲制度分裂的结构性原因(1991-2019)","authors":"J. C. Rodriguez, V. Haag","doi":"10.1590/0034-7329202200111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regional integration in Latin America and the Caribbean has seen better days. We claim recent retreat trends are related to China and Brazil acting respectively as extra-regional and regional catalysts of institutional fragmentation. Our main hypotheses propose the following conditions are necessary for increasing fragmentation in the region: advances of an extra-regional emerging power, and the absence of a regional paymaster that promotes integration. By comparing regional organizations using longitudinal data, we find that growing ties to China and shrinking ties to Brazil can be associated with evidence of institutional fragmentation in Latin America. We claim that the two factors increase competition between regional organizations through a mechanism of changing set of costs and benefits of engagement and participation promoted by China’s interest and Brazil’s disinterest on each project","PeriodicalId":45317,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The space left for regional integration (or lack thereof): Structural causes of institutional fragmentation in Latin America (1991-2019)\",\"authors\":\"J. C. Rodriguez, V. Haag\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0034-7329202200111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regional integration in Latin America and the Caribbean has seen better days. We claim recent retreat trends are related to China and Brazil acting respectively as extra-regional and regional catalysts of institutional fragmentation. Our main hypotheses propose the following conditions are necessary for increasing fragmentation in the region: advances of an extra-regional emerging power, and the absence of a regional paymaster that promotes integration. By comparing regional organizations using longitudinal data, we find that growing ties to China and shrinking ties to Brazil can be associated with evidence of institutional fragmentation in Latin America. We claim that the two factors increase competition between regional organizations through a mechanism of changing set of costs and benefits of engagement and participation promoted by China’s interest and Brazil’s disinterest on each project\",\"PeriodicalId\":45317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202200111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202200111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的区域一体化经历了更好的时期。我们认为,最近的撤退趋势与中国和巴西分别作为区域外和区域制度碎片化的催化剂有关。我们的主要假设提出,区域分裂加剧的必要条件如下:区域外新兴大国的进步,以及缺乏促进一体化的区域支付者。通过使用纵向数据对区域组织进行比较,我们发现,与中国的联系日益密切,与巴西的联系日益减少,这与拉丁美洲的制度碎片化有关。我们声称,这两个因素通过一种改变参与和参与的成本和收益的机制,增加了区域组织之间的竞争,这种机制是由中国对每个项目的兴趣和巴西对每个项目的不感兴趣所推动的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The space left for regional integration (or lack thereof): Structural causes of institutional fragmentation in Latin America (1991-2019)
Regional integration in Latin America and the Caribbean has seen better days. We claim recent retreat trends are related to China and Brazil acting respectively as extra-regional and regional catalysts of institutional fragmentation. Our main hypotheses propose the following conditions are necessary for increasing fragmentation in the region: advances of an extra-regional emerging power, and the absence of a regional paymaster that promotes integration. By comparing regional organizations using longitudinal data, we find that growing ties to China and shrinking ties to Brazil can be associated with evidence of institutional fragmentation in Latin America. We claim that the two factors increase competition between regional organizations through a mechanism of changing set of costs and benefits of engagement and participation promoted by China’s interest and Brazil’s disinterest on each project
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Domestic regimes and national preferences as factors of regionalism’s crisis. The case of Guatemala’s regional integration policy War, Sanctions, Deglobalization: Which Comes First? Brazil-China Cooperation in the Arctic Region: A Prospective Analysis of a Practical Agenda for Mutual, Local and Community Interests Domestic Politics, Prestige, and War: The Emergence of Chile’s Democratic Status Narrative How do impeachments influence foreign policies? Lessons from South America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1