几种地震折射法数据处理的统计分析:一个综合数据实例

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geofizika Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.15233/GFZ.2017.34.2
P. Adetokunbo, O. Sanuade, P. Edigbue, K. Adegbola, Toluwani Daramola
{"title":"几种地震折射法数据处理的统计分析:一个综合数据实例","authors":"P. Adetokunbo, O. Sanuade, P. Edigbue, K. Adegbola, Toluwani Daramola","doi":"10.15233/GFZ.2017.34.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The delay time method has gained attention in shallow seismic refraction survey because it has the capability to map the lateral thickness of overburden and relief of bedrock. This study addresses the comparison between the performances of the plus-minus and conventional reciprocal methods using a synthetic data. The interpretations obtained from both methods are reasonably comparable to the actual geophysical models. This suggests that either of the methods can be used to construct a geologic section. However, the result of randomized complete block design (RCBD) experiment shows a significant difference in the type of method used and this necessitate the need for further test. The pairwise comparison suggests that the plus-minus method produces a model that better mimics the actual data than the conventional reciprocal method.","PeriodicalId":50419,"journal":{"name":"Geofizika","volume":"34 1","pages":"93-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical analysis of data processing in some seismic refraction methods: A synthetic data example\",\"authors\":\"P. Adetokunbo, O. Sanuade, P. Edigbue, K. Adegbola, Toluwani Daramola\",\"doi\":\"10.15233/GFZ.2017.34.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The delay time method has gained attention in shallow seismic refraction survey because it has the capability to map the lateral thickness of overburden and relief of bedrock. This study addresses the comparison between the performances of the plus-minus and conventional reciprocal methods using a synthetic data. The interpretations obtained from both methods are reasonably comparable to the actual geophysical models. This suggests that either of the methods can be used to construct a geologic section. However, the result of randomized complete block design (RCBD) experiment shows a significant difference in the type of method used and this necessitate the need for further test. The pairwise comparison suggests that the plus-minus method produces a model that better mimics the actual data than the conventional reciprocal method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geofizika\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"93-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geofizika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15233/GFZ.2017.34.2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofizika","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15233/GFZ.2017.34.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

延迟时间法由于具有绘制覆盖层横向厚度和基岩起伏的能力,在浅层地震折射测量中受到了广泛的关注。本研究利用合成数据对正负法和传统的互反法的性能进行了比较。用这两种方法得到的解释与实际地球物理模型相当。这表明,这两种方法都可以用来构造地质剖面。然而,随机完全块设计(RCBD)实验结果显示,所使用的方法类型存在显著差异,这需要进一步的试验。两两比较表明,正负法产生的模型比传统的倒数法更能模拟实际数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statistical analysis of data processing in some seismic refraction methods: A synthetic data example
The delay time method has gained attention in shallow seismic refraction survey because it has the capability to map the lateral thickness of overburden and relief of bedrock. This study addresses the comparison between the performances of the plus-minus and conventional reciprocal methods using a synthetic data. The interpretations obtained from both methods are reasonably comparable to the actual geophysical models. This suggests that either of the methods can be used to construct a geologic section. However, the result of randomized complete block design (RCBD) experiment shows a significant difference in the type of method used and this necessitate the need for further test. The pairwise comparison suggests that the plus-minus method produces a model that better mimics the actual data than the conventional reciprocal method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geofizika
Geofizika 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Geofizika journal succeeds the Papers series (Radovi), which has been published since 1923 at the Geophysical Institute in Zagreb (current the Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb). Geofizika publishes contributions dealing with physics of the atmosphere, the sea and the Earth''s interior.
期刊最新文献
Mediterranean meteotsunamis of May 2021 and June 2022 Očekivano toplinsko opterećenje Dubrovnika, Osijeka, Rijeke, Zadra i Zagreba prema projekcijama regionalnih klimatskih modela Short-term forecasting of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations with Facebook's Prophet Model at the Belgrade-Zeleno brdo Statistical analogies between earthquakes, micro-quakes in metals and avalanches in the 1D Burridge-Knopoff model Kratkoročna prognoza vidljivosti određena metodom slučajne šume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1