基辅哲学学派在其创造者口头回忆中的历史(处决文艺复兴时代)

H. Vdovychenko
{"title":"基辅哲学学派在其创造者口头回忆中的历史(处决文艺复兴时代)","authors":"H. Vdovychenko","doi":"10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the revival by the Kyiv philosophical school of the second half of the 20th century of the first academic research on the history of Ukrainian philosophy, interrupted in the 1930s. These studies were a component of the innovative project of P. Kopnin and V. Shynkaruk as the directors of the H. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy and were carried out in the contradictory conditions of the Khrushchev \"thaw\" and stagnation by the illustrious generation of the philosophers-Sixtiers of the Ukrainian SSR. Their memories were mainly realized in T. Chaika's pro- ject \"The Philosophers' Oral Histories\" in the form of autobiographical reconstructions of S. Krymskyi, P. Yolon, V. Horskyi and M. Popovych and also in the corresponding reconstructions of their colleagues Y. Golovakha, M. Kashuba and Y. Stratii, carried out by the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. The study, mainly, of these memories testifies to the general attention of these scholars to Ukrainian studies as one of the main vectors of the research work of the mentioned institute in the second half of the 20th century. Analysis of their contribution to the study of the history of Ukrainian philosophy on the basis of the alternative data received from them in this projects already in independent Ukraine significantly changes the traditional vision of started by the Kyiv philosophical school in the 1950s cen- sored study of the \"philosophical front\" of the Ukrainian SSR during the Executed Renaissance. These interviews with S. Krymskyi, E. Golovakha, V. Horskyi, as well as the interviews and memoirs of their colleagues, revealed a little-known problematic interpretation by the creators of the Kyiv philosophical school of their place and role in the history of Ukrainian philosophy as the leading heirs of started in the 1920s institutionalization of the domestic national philosophical tradition.","PeriodicalId":52653,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HISTORY OF THE KYIV PHILOSOPHICAL SCHOOL IN THE ORAL RECOLLECTIONS OF ITS CREATORS (THE ERA OF THE EXECUTED RENAISSANCE)\",\"authors\":\"H. Vdovychenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the revival by the Kyiv philosophical school of the second half of the 20th century of the first academic research on the history of Ukrainian philosophy, interrupted in the 1930s. These studies were a component of the innovative project of P. Kopnin and V. Shynkaruk as the directors of the H. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy and were carried out in the contradictory conditions of the Khrushchev \\\"thaw\\\" and stagnation by the illustrious generation of the philosophers-Sixtiers of the Ukrainian SSR. Their memories were mainly realized in T. Chaika's pro- ject \\\"The Philosophers' Oral Histories\\\" in the form of autobiographical reconstructions of S. Krymskyi, P. Yolon, V. Horskyi and M. Popovych and also in the corresponding reconstructions of their colleagues Y. Golovakha, M. Kashuba and Y. Stratii, carried out by the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. The study, mainly, of these memories testifies to the general attention of these scholars to Ukrainian studies as one of the main vectors of the research work of the mentioned institute in the second half of the 20th century. Analysis of their contribution to the study of the history of Ukrainian philosophy on the basis of the alternative data received from them in this projects already in independent Ukraine significantly changes the traditional vision of started by the Kyiv philosophical school in the 1950s cen- sored study of the \\\"philosophical front\\\" of the Ukrainian SSR during the Executed Renaissance. These interviews with S. Krymskyi, E. Golovakha, V. Horskyi, as well as the interviews and memoirs of their colleagues, revealed a little-known problematic interpretation by the creators of the Kyiv philosophical school of their place and role in the history of Ukrainian philosophy as the leading heirs of started in the 1920s institutionalization of the domestic national philosophical tradition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了20世纪下半叶基辅哲学学派对乌克兰哲学史的第一次学术研究的复兴,这一研究中断于20世纪30年代。这些研究是P. Kopnin和V. Shynkaruk作为H. Skovoroda哲学研究所所长的创新项目的一个组成部分,是在赫鲁晓夫“解冻”和停滞的矛盾条件下由杰出的一代哲学家——乌克兰苏维埃社会主义共和国的60年代——进行的。他们的记忆主要在T. Chaika的项目“哲学家的口述历史”中实现,其形式是S. Krymskyi, P. Yolon, V. Horskyi和M. Popovych的自传体重建,以及他们的同事Y. Golovakha, M. Kashuba和Y. Stratii的相应重建,由基辅塔拉斯舍甫琴科国立大学哲学口述历史学生协会进行。对这些记忆的研究主要证明了这些学者对乌克兰研究的普遍关注,乌克兰研究是上述研究所在20世纪下半叶研究工作的主要载体之一。分析他们对乌克兰哲学史研究的贡献是基于他们在独立的乌克兰项目中收到的替代数据,这大大改变了基辅哲学学派在20世纪50年代开始的传统观点,即在被处决的文艺复兴期间对乌克兰苏维埃社会主义共和国的“哲学阵线”进行审查研究。这些对S. Krymskyi、E. Golovakha和V. Horskyi的采访,以及他们的同事的采访和回忆录,揭示了基辅哲学学派的创始人对他们在乌克兰哲学史上的地位和作用的一个鲜为人知的问题解释,他们是20世纪20年代开始的国内民族哲学传统制度化的主要继承人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HISTORY OF THE KYIV PHILOSOPHICAL SCHOOL IN THE ORAL RECOLLECTIONS OF ITS CREATORS (THE ERA OF THE EXECUTED RENAISSANCE)
The article deals with the revival by the Kyiv philosophical school of the second half of the 20th century of the first academic research on the history of Ukrainian philosophy, interrupted in the 1930s. These studies were a component of the innovative project of P. Kopnin and V. Shynkaruk as the directors of the H. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy and were carried out in the contradictory conditions of the Khrushchev "thaw" and stagnation by the illustrious generation of the philosophers-Sixtiers of the Ukrainian SSR. Their memories were mainly realized in T. Chaika's pro- ject "The Philosophers' Oral Histories" in the form of autobiographical reconstructions of S. Krymskyi, P. Yolon, V. Horskyi and M. Popovych and also in the corresponding reconstructions of their colleagues Y. Golovakha, M. Kashuba and Y. Stratii, carried out by the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. The study, mainly, of these memories testifies to the general attention of these scholars to Ukrainian studies as one of the main vectors of the research work of the mentioned institute in the second half of the 20th century. Analysis of their contribution to the study of the history of Ukrainian philosophy on the basis of the alternative data received from them in this projects already in independent Ukraine significantly changes the traditional vision of started by the Kyiv philosophical school in the 1950s cen- sored study of the "philosophical front" of the Ukrainian SSR during the Executed Renaissance. These interviews with S. Krymskyi, E. Golovakha, V. Horskyi, as well as the interviews and memoirs of their colleagues, revealed a little-known problematic interpretation by the creators of the Kyiv philosophical school of their place and role in the history of Ukrainian philosophy as the leading heirs of started in the 1920s institutionalization of the domestic national philosophical tradition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR: CULTURAL ASPECT SAVING UKRAINIAN CULTURAL HERITAGE DURING THE WAR: PRACTICES OF INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS THEME OF THE WAR IN FINE ARTS: PECULIARITY OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS MOBILE APP DESIGN FUNCTIONALITY WITH DIGITALIZED CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS OF KHARKIV CITY AND KHARKIV REGION FROM "RED" TO "NEW" CULTURE: TRADITION AND INNOVATIONS IN CHINESE MARXISM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1