P. Eberle, D. Haro, Kendra Rekevics, Heather E. M. Liwanag
{"title":"意大利壁蜥自切尾后尾巴再生的生理效应","authors":"P. Eberle, D. Haro, Kendra Rekevics, Heather E. M. Liwanag","doi":"10.1670/21-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Caudal autotomy (the voluntary loss of a tail) is an important antipredator defense in many lizard species. The subsequent regrowth of the tail, seen in most lizards with the ability to autotomize, may pose some physiological costs both during the regrowth process and during potential repeated autotomy. In this study, we examined the physiology and behavior of the lacertid lizard Podarcis siculus, as well as the physiology and activity of the detached tails, following autotomy. Evaporative water loss and respiratory exchange ratio increased after autotomy, showing both an increased loss and a redistribution of important resources inside the animal. The lizards exhibited no change in behavioral thermoregulation during regrowth, as thermal preference did not change. Males and females differed in tail energy content, suggesting differing energy storage needs between the sexes. The rate of regeneration and tail movement between the sexes were not different, but tail movement did vary between previously regenerated tails and original tails, indicating a possible detriment to future autotomy events. Overall, autotomy appears to influence more than just a lizard's ability to escape, as our study provides evidence of potential physiological tradeoffs associated with this antipredator behavior.","PeriodicalId":54821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herpetology","volume":"56 1","pages":"434 - 443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiological Effects of Tail Regeneration following Autotomy in Italian Wall Lizards, Podarcis siculus\",\"authors\":\"P. Eberle, D. Haro, Kendra Rekevics, Heather E. M. Liwanag\",\"doi\":\"10.1670/21-021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Caudal autotomy (the voluntary loss of a tail) is an important antipredator defense in many lizard species. The subsequent regrowth of the tail, seen in most lizards with the ability to autotomize, may pose some physiological costs both during the regrowth process and during potential repeated autotomy. In this study, we examined the physiology and behavior of the lacertid lizard Podarcis siculus, as well as the physiology and activity of the detached tails, following autotomy. Evaporative water loss and respiratory exchange ratio increased after autotomy, showing both an increased loss and a redistribution of important resources inside the animal. The lizards exhibited no change in behavioral thermoregulation during regrowth, as thermal preference did not change. Males and females differed in tail energy content, suggesting differing energy storage needs between the sexes. The rate of regeneration and tail movement between the sexes were not different, but tail movement did vary between previously regenerated tails and original tails, indicating a possible detriment to future autotomy events. Overall, autotomy appears to influence more than just a lizard's ability to escape, as our study provides evidence of potential physiological tradeoffs associated with this antipredator behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Herpetology\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"434 - 443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Herpetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1670/21-021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1670/21-021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physiological Effects of Tail Regeneration following Autotomy in Italian Wall Lizards, Podarcis siculus
Abstract. Caudal autotomy (the voluntary loss of a tail) is an important antipredator defense in many lizard species. The subsequent regrowth of the tail, seen in most lizards with the ability to autotomize, may pose some physiological costs both during the regrowth process and during potential repeated autotomy. In this study, we examined the physiology and behavior of the lacertid lizard Podarcis siculus, as well as the physiology and activity of the detached tails, following autotomy. Evaporative water loss and respiratory exchange ratio increased after autotomy, showing both an increased loss and a redistribution of important resources inside the animal. The lizards exhibited no change in behavioral thermoregulation during regrowth, as thermal preference did not change. Males and females differed in tail energy content, suggesting differing energy storage needs between the sexes. The rate of regeneration and tail movement between the sexes were not different, but tail movement did vary between previously regenerated tails and original tails, indicating a possible detriment to future autotomy events. Overall, autotomy appears to influence more than just a lizard's ability to escape, as our study provides evidence of potential physiological tradeoffs associated with this antipredator behavior.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Herpetology accepts manuscripts on all aspects on the biology of amphibians and reptiles including their behavior, conservation, ecology, morphology, physiology, and systematics, as well as herpetological education. We encourage authors to submit manuscripts that are data-driven and rigorous tests of hypotheses, or provide thorough descriptions of novel taxa (living or fossil). Topics may address theoretical issues in a thoughtful, quantitative way. Reviews and policy papers that provide new insight on the herpetological sciences are also welcome, but they must be more than simple literature reviews. These papers must have a central focus that propose a new argument for understanding a concept or a new approach for answering a question or solving a problem. Focus sections that combine papers on related topics are normally determined by the Editors. Publication in the Long-Term Perspectives section is by invitation only. Papers on captive breeding, new techniques or sampling methods, anecdotal or isolated natural history observations, geographic range extensions, and essays should be submitted to our sister journal, Herpetological Review.