支持使用迭代选择最适合的敏捷模型

Q4 Decision Sciences Pesquisa Operacional Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043spe1.00264750
V. B. Schramm, A. Damasceno, F. Schramm
{"title":"支持使用迭代选择最适合的敏捷模型","authors":"V. B. Schramm, A. Damasceno, F. Schramm","doi":"10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043spe1.00264750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The goal of this study is to propose a decision model for supporting the choice of the best-agile model, based on the Flexible and Interactive Tradeoff (FITradeoff) method. This study provides the definition of an extensive set of 38 measurable criteria that were considered for evaluation of the most popular agile process models used in small and medium-scale enterprises. To illustrate the application of the model, we applied it to a set of alternatives that includes DSDM, SCRUM, XP2 and Crystal and an experienced project manager acted as our decision maker during the interactive elicitation process of the FITradeoff. The results show that the FITradeoff is very valuable for this class of problem because of its strong mathematical foundation and the possibility of combining two different ways for modeling the preferences of decision makers, which makes the process cognitively easier than other multi-criteria methods and increase the confidence on the results. Although our study focuses on the context of small and medium-scale companies for software development, the approach can be used to other types of environments, including distributed software development and large enterprises.","PeriodicalId":35341,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa Operacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUPPORTING THE CHOICE OF THE BEST-FIT AGILE MODEL USING FITRADEOFF\",\"authors\":\"V. B. Schramm, A. Damasceno, F. Schramm\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043spe1.00264750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The goal of this study is to propose a decision model for supporting the choice of the best-agile model, based on the Flexible and Interactive Tradeoff (FITradeoff) method. This study provides the definition of an extensive set of 38 measurable criteria that were considered for evaluation of the most popular agile process models used in small and medium-scale enterprises. To illustrate the application of the model, we applied it to a set of alternatives that includes DSDM, SCRUM, XP2 and Crystal and an experienced project manager acted as our decision maker during the interactive elicitation process of the FITradeoff. The results show that the FITradeoff is very valuable for this class of problem because of its strong mathematical foundation and the possibility of combining two different ways for modeling the preferences of decision makers, which makes the process cognitively easier than other multi-criteria methods and increase the confidence on the results. Although our study focuses on the context of small and medium-scale companies for software development, the approach can be used to other types of environments, including distributed software development and large enterprises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pesquisa Operacional\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pesquisa Operacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043spe1.00264750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa Operacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043spe1.00264750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 本研究的目的是提出一个基于灵活交互权衡(FITradeoff)方法的决策模型,以支持最佳敏捷模型的选择。本研究提供了一套广泛的38个可测量标准的定义,这些标准被认为是评估中小型企业中最流行的敏捷过程模型的标准。为了说明该模型的应用,我们将其应用于包括DSDM, SCRUM, XP2和Crystal在内的一组备选方案,并在FITradeoff的交互式启发过程中由一位经验丰富的项目经理担任我们的决策者。结果表明,fitradoff方法在这类问题中具有很强的数学基础,并且可以结合两种不同的方法来建模决策者的偏好,这使得该过程比其他多准则方法更容易认知,并增加了结果的置信度。虽然我们的研究集中在软件开发的中小型公司的背景下,但是该方法可以用于其他类型的环境,包括分布式软件开发和大型企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SUPPORTING THE CHOICE OF THE BEST-FIT AGILE MODEL USING FITRADEOFF
. The goal of this study is to propose a decision model for supporting the choice of the best-agile model, based on the Flexible and Interactive Tradeoff (FITradeoff) method. This study provides the definition of an extensive set of 38 measurable criteria that were considered for evaluation of the most popular agile process models used in small and medium-scale enterprises. To illustrate the application of the model, we applied it to a set of alternatives that includes DSDM, SCRUM, XP2 and Crystal and an experienced project manager acted as our decision maker during the interactive elicitation process of the FITradeoff. The results show that the FITradeoff is very valuable for this class of problem because of its strong mathematical foundation and the possibility of combining two different ways for modeling the preferences of decision makers, which makes the process cognitively easier than other multi-criteria methods and increase the confidence on the results. Although our study focuses on the context of small and medium-scale companies for software development, the approach can be used to other types of environments, including distributed software development and large enterprises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pesquisa Operacional
Pesquisa Operacional Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pesquisa Operacional is published each semester by the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional - SOBRAPO, performing one volume per year, and is distributed free of charge to its associates. The abbreviated title of the journal is Pesq. Oper., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
STUDY FOR DECENTRALIZATION OF NAVAL POWER IN THE BRAZILIAN NAVY: STRUCTURING AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN THE LIGHT OF THE ELECTRE-MOR METHOD FUZZY-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR PRIVATE BANKING RECOVERY OF A GREEN HOSPITAL SYSTEMS BASED ON ISO 14001: 2015 STANDARDS A NEW MODELLING FOR THE AIRCRAFT LANDING PROBLEM AND MATHEURISTIC APPROACH TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF AIRCRAFT BI-LEVEL MODEL: NEW APPROACH TO DYNAMIC VEHICLE ALLOCATION IN SUPPLY CHAIN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1