管理护理中的抑郁症:选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂的成本

B. Mcfarland
{"title":"管理护理中的抑郁症:选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂的成本","authors":"B. Mcfarland","doi":"10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.2.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To review data on the comparative costs of antidepressants. DESIGN: Review of data from articles identified in a Medline search, meeting presentations, and independent market research that are relevant to the costs associated with treating depression. Studies were included if they compared depression treatment costs with tricyclic antidepressants to those with one of the leading selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or if they compared treatment costs among the leading SSRIs. Data were extracted on drug acquisition costs, concomitant medications, dose titration, multitablet/multi-capsule therapy, duration of therapy, and overall treatment costs. RESULTS: SSRIs may be more costeffective than tricyclic antidepressants because they are associated with lower health care utilization. Assessment of economic outcomes with SSRI therapy can be based on identified cost drivers, including dose titration and the need for multi-tablet therapy. Among the SSRIs, the uses of nonpharmaceutical health ...","PeriodicalId":50156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depression in Managed Care: Costs of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"B. Mcfarland\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.2.142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To review data on the comparative costs of antidepressants. DESIGN: Review of data from articles identified in a Medline search, meeting presentations, and independent market research that are relevant to the costs associated with treating depression. Studies were included if they compared depression treatment costs with tricyclic antidepressants to those with one of the leading selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or if they compared treatment costs among the leading SSRIs. Data were extracted on drug acquisition costs, concomitant medications, dose titration, multitablet/multi-capsule therapy, duration of therapy, and overall treatment costs. RESULTS: SSRIs may be more costeffective than tricyclic antidepressants because they are associated with lower health care utilization. Assessment of economic outcomes with SSRI therapy can be based on identified cost drivers, including dose titration and the need for multi-tablet therapy. Among the SSRIs, the uses of nonpharmaceutical health ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":50156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.2.142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.2.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾抗抑郁药的比较成本数据。设计:回顾Medline检索、会议报告和独立市场研究中与治疗抑郁症相关费用相关的文章的数据。如果研究比较了三环类抗抑郁药和一种主要的选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的治疗费用,或者比较了主要的SSRIs的治疗费用,那么这些研究就被纳入其中。提取有关药物获取成本、伴随用药、剂量滴定、多片/多胶囊治疗、治疗持续时间和总体治疗成本的数据。结果:SSRIs可能比三环抗抑郁药更具成本效益,因为它们与较低的医疗保健使用率相关。对SSRI治疗的经济效果的评估可以基于确定的成本驱动因素,包括剂量滴定和多片治疗的需要。在ssri类药物中,非药物类保健药物的使用…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depression in Managed Care: Costs of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
OBJECTIVE: To review data on the comparative costs of antidepressants. DESIGN: Review of data from articles identified in a Medline search, meeting presentations, and independent market research that are relevant to the costs associated with treating depression. Studies were included if they compared depression treatment costs with tricyclic antidepressants to those with one of the leading selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or if they compared treatment costs among the leading SSRIs. Data were extracted on drug acquisition costs, concomitant medications, dose titration, multitablet/multi-capsule therapy, duration of therapy, and overall treatment costs. RESULTS: SSRIs may be more costeffective than tricyclic antidepressants because they are associated with lower health care utilization. Assessment of economic outcomes with SSRI therapy can be based on identified cost drivers, including dose titration and the need for multi-tablet therapy. Among the SSRIs, the uses of nonpharmaceutical health ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Added sugars on nutrition labels: a way to support population health in Canada. Managing Congestive Heart Failure in the Medicare Risk Population Pharmacy Cost Reduction Imperative at United HealthCare Analyzing Variations in Medication Compliance Related to Individual Drug, Drug Class, and Prescribing Physician Evaluation of Blood Pressure and Adverse Effects in Patients Converted from Lisinopril to Benazepril
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1