在没有治疗交换的综合卫生系统中推动市场份额

J. Fischer, R. M. Mowers, David J. Ormerod, Ellen S. Burriss
{"title":"在没有治疗交换的综合卫生系统中推动市场份额","authors":"J. Fischer, R. M. Mowers, David J. Ormerod, Ellen S. Burriss","doi":"10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.4.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: Shift selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) market share in a large integrated health system to a more cost-effective alternative without the need for therapeutic interchange. SETTING: University of California Davis Medical Group (UCDMG). PRACTICE INNOVATION: Integrate the managed care team into the routine operation of the medical group clinics. Influence prescribing patterns by a program of continuous physician education, giving the messages that (1) citalopram was the most costeffective SSRI; (2) fluoxetine is the least cost-effective, especially at doses above 20 mg; and (3) that citalopram should be considered as initial therapy for depression and for patients not achieving optimal therapy on their current SSRI. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Change in market share for SSRIs: prescriptions for citalopram and fluoxetine were monitored for a year after the physician education program began. RESULTS: Market share for citalopram increased dramatically. Starting below the reported national usage, t...","PeriodicalId":50156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driving Market Share in an Integrated Health System without Therapeutic Interchange\",\"authors\":\"J. Fischer, R. M. Mowers, David J. Ormerod, Ellen S. Burriss\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.4.283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: Shift selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) market share in a large integrated health system to a more cost-effective alternative without the need for therapeutic interchange. SETTING: University of California Davis Medical Group (UCDMG). PRACTICE INNOVATION: Integrate the managed care team into the routine operation of the medical group clinics. Influence prescribing patterns by a program of continuous physician education, giving the messages that (1) citalopram was the most costeffective SSRI; (2) fluoxetine is the least cost-effective, especially at doses above 20 mg; and (3) that citalopram should be considered as initial therapy for depression and for patients not achieving optimal therapy on their current SSRI. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Change in market share for SSRIs: prescriptions for citalopram and fluoxetine were monitored for a year after the physician education program began. RESULTS: Market share for citalopram increased dramatically. Starting below the reported national usage, t...\",\"PeriodicalId\":50156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.4.283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.4.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:将选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)在大型综合医疗系统中的市场份额转移到更具成本效益的替代方案,而无需治疗交换。单位:加州大学戴维斯分校医疗集团(UCDMG)。实践创新:将管理式医疗团队整合到医疗集团诊所的日常运作中。通过医师持续教育项目影响处方模式,给予以下信息:(1)西酞普兰是最具成本效益的SSRI;(2)氟西汀最不划算,尤其是在剂量大于20mg时;(3)西酞普兰应被视为抑郁症的初始治疗,对于目前SSRI治疗效果不佳的患者。结果测量:SSRIs市场份额的变化:在医师教育项目开始后,对西酞普兰和氟西汀处方进行了一年的监测。结果:西酞普兰的市场份额急剧增加。从报道的全国用法开始,t…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Driving Market Share in an Integrated Health System without Therapeutic Interchange
OBJECTIVE: Shift selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) market share in a large integrated health system to a more cost-effective alternative without the need for therapeutic interchange. SETTING: University of California Davis Medical Group (UCDMG). PRACTICE INNOVATION: Integrate the managed care team into the routine operation of the medical group clinics. Influence prescribing patterns by a program of continuous physician education, giving the messages that (1) citalopram was the most costeffective SSRI; (2) fluoxetine is the least cost-effective, especially at doses above 20 mg; and (3) that citalopram should be considered as initial therapy for depression and for patients not achieving optimal therapy on their current SSRI. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Change in market share for SSRIs: prescriptions for citalopram and fluoxetine were monitored for a year after the physician education program began. RESULTS: Market share for citalopram increased dramatically. Starting below the reported national usage, t...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Managing Congestive Heart Failure in the Medicare Risk Population Pharmacy Cost Reduction Imperative at United HealthCare Analyzing Variations in Medication Compliance Related to Individual Drug, Drug Class, and Prescribing Physician Evaluation of Blood Pressure and Adverse Effects in Patients Converted from Lisinopril to Benazepril The Treatment of Depression with Newer Antidepressants: Pharmacology and Efficacy Versus Clinical Effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1