仅仅做对是不够的:上诉法院在程序正义中的作用

Steve Leben
{"title":"仅仅做对是不够的:上诉法院在程序正义中的作用","authors":"Steve Leben","doi":"10.17161/1808.31568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive research has shown that adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of an authority’s legitimacy. In courts, adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to greater compliance with court orders, greater cooperation with courts, and higher overall approval for the court system. This Article applies the lessons of procedural justice to the appellate courts. \n \nThe Article first reviews public-opinion data about the courts, finding that a generally diminished trust in institutions includes the courts. The Article then reviews the research showing that the application of procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of court legitimacy. From that basis, the Article recommends several steps appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court, should take to improve perceptions of fairness.","PeriodicalId":83417,"journal":{"name":"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\",,,Getting It Right Isn’t Enough: The Appellate Court’s Role in Procedural Justice\",\"authors\":\"Steve Leben\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/1808.31568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extensive research has shown that adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of an authority’s legitimacy. In courts, adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to greater compliance with court orders, greater cooperation with courts, and higher overall approval for the court system. This Article applies the lessons of procedural justice to the appellate courts. \\n \\nThe Article first reviews public-opinion data about the courts, finding that a generally diminished trust in institutions includes the courts. The Article then reviews the research showing that the application of procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of court legitimacy. From that basis, the Article recommends several steps appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court, should take to improve perceptions of fairness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/1808.31568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/1808.31568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

广泛的研究表明,遵守程序正义原则会让人更有权威的合法性。在法庭上,遵守程序正义原则会导致对法院命令的更大遵守,与法院的更大合作,以及对法院系统更高的总体认可。本条将程序正义的教训适用于上诉法院。本文首先回顾了有关法院的公众舆论数据,发现对包括法院在内的机构的信任度普遍下降。然后,文章回顾了研究表明,程序正义原则的适用导致更大的法院合法性。在此基础上,该条建议上诉法院,包括美国最高法院,应该采取几个步骤来提高对公平的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
,,,Getting It Right Isn’t Enough: The Appellate Court’s Role in Procedural Justice
Extensive research has shown that adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of an authority’s legitimacy. In courts, adherence to procedural-justice principles leads to greater compliance with court orders, greater cooperation with courts, and higher overall approval for the court system. This Article applies the lessons of procedural justice to the appellate courts. The Article first reviews public-opinion data about the courts, finding that a generally diminished trust in institutions includes the courts. The Article then reviews the research showing that the application of procedural-justice principles leads to a greater sense of court legitimacy. From that basis, the Article recommends several steps appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court, should take to improve perceptions of fairness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
,,,Toxic Secrecy: Non-Disclosure Agreements and #MeToo ,,,Dressing for Success: Lawyers & Clothing in Nineteenth Century America ,,,Lawyers for White People? ,,,Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination Claims Under the Fair Housing Act After Bostock v. Clayton County ,,,Getting It Right Isn’t Enough: The Appellate Court’s Role in Procedural Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1