从第三轮IRF序列的反馈到后续:促进英语课堂真实互动的挑战

Laura Margarita Pinzón-Jácome, Carlos Augusto Lozano-Jaimes, Laura Cristina Dueñas-Angulo
{"title":"从第三轮IRF序列的反馈到后续:促进英语课堂真实互动的挑战","authors":"Laura Margarita Pinzón-Jácome, Carlos Augusto Lozano-Jaimes, Laura Cristina Dueñas-Angulo","doi":"10.16925/ra.v18i33.1846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In this paper, we present an analysis of the teacher-student interaction patterns in efl classes found at a Colombian private university. Methodology: This analysis was made during a qualitative case study in which 36 class observations were conducted. Data were coded and further categorized with the help of Nvivo10 software. Findings: Teacher-student interaction was the most common type of classroom exchange. A three-turn sequence, commonly referred to as irf, was chief among those interactions. In an irf exchange the teacher (I)nitiates the interaction, the student (R)esponds and the teacher provides (F)eedback . The third turn in irf exchanges was scarcely used to follow-up on students’ responses. Furthermore, we present the implications of using the third turn for both feedback and follow-up. Conclusions: Given the analysis made, the authors conclude that teachers should use the third turn for follow-up if the goal is to promote genuine linguistic interaction and engage students in meaningful communication.","PeriodicalId":30972,"journal":{"name":"Rastros Rostros","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From feedback to follow-up in the third turn of IRF sequences: A challenge to promote genuine interaction in EFL classes\",\"authors\":\"Laura Margarita Pinzón-Jácome, Carlos Augusto Lozano-Jaimes, Laura Cristina Dueñas-Angulo\",\"doi\":\"10.16925/ra.v18i33.1846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In this paper, we present an analysis of the teacher-student interaction patterns in efl classes found at a Colombian private university. Methodology: This analysis was made during a qualitative case study in which 36 class observations were conducted. Data were coded and further categorized with the help of Nvivo10 software. Findings: Teacher-student interaction was the most common type of classroom exchange. A three-turn sequence, commonly referred to as irf, was chief among those interactions. In an irf exchange the teacher (I)nitiates the interaction, the student (R)esponds and the teacher provides (F)eedback . The third turn in irf exchanges was scarcely used to follow-up on students’ responses. Furthermore, we present the implications of using the third turn for both feedback and follow-up. Conclusions: Given the analysis made, the authors conclude that teachers should use the third turn for follow-up if the goal is to promote genuine linguistic interaction and engage students in meaningful communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rastros Rostros\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rastros Rostros\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16925/ra.v18i33.1846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rastros Rostros","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16925/ra.v18i33.1846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

前言:本文对哥伦比亚一所私立大学英语课堂的师生互动模式进行了分析。方法:本分析是在定性案例研究中进行的,其中进行了36个班级观察。数据在Nvivo10软件的帮助下进行编码和进一步分类。发现:师生互动是最常见的课堂交流形式。一个三回合的序列,通常被称为irf,是这些相互作用中的主要部分。在irf交换中,教师(I)发起互动,学生(R)回应,教师(F)提供反馈。irf交流的第三轮几乎没有用于跟进学生的反应。此外,我们提出了使用第三轮反馈和后续的含义。结论:基于分析,作者得出结论,如果教师的目标是促进真正的语言互动,并使学生参与有意义的交流,则应使用第三轮进行跟进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From feedback to follow-up in the third turn of IRF sequences: A challenge to promote genuine interaction in EFL classes
Introduction: In this paper, we present an analysis of the teacher-student interaction patterns in efl classes found at a Colombian private university. Methodology: This analysis was made during a qualitative case study in which 36 class observations were conducted. Data were coded and further categorized with the help of Nvivo10 software. Findings: Teacher-student interaction was the most common type of classroom exchange. A three-turn sequence, commonly referred to as irf, was chief among those interactions. In an irf exchange the teacher (I)nitiates the interaction, the student (R)esponds and the teacher provides (F)eedback . The third turn in irf exchanges was scarcely used to follow-up on students’ responses. Furthermore, we present the implications of using the third turn for both feedback and follow-up. Conclusions: Given the analysis made, the authors conclude that teachers should use the third turn for follow-up if the goal is to promote genuine linguistic interaction and engage students in meaningful communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigación sobre la inteligencia cultural de los futuros maestros de música en las universidades turcas Universidad y Lectura. Educomunicación: Curso virtual en gestión de proyectos para la presentación de propuestas de reparación de los miembros de la fuerza pública ante la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz dilema para elegir la formación profesional, caso de estudio región del Alto Magdalena
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1