原发闭角病的透明晶状体摘除术的利弊

S. Ahmad, Ghuncha Khatoon, Iram Jahan, Naeem Arafat, Anwar Husain, Tooba Hayat
{"title":"原发闭角病的透明晶状体摘除术的利弊","authors":"S. Ahmad, Ghuncha Khatoon, Iram Jahan, Naeem Arafat, Anwar Husain, Tooba Hayat","doi":"10.17925/usor.2020.13.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cataract extraction for management of primary angle-closure disease has been successfully practiced for many years. However, the extraction of a clear lens for glaucoma management, when visual symptoms are minimal, is a controversial subject. A few studies have reported on the outcomes of clear lens extraction without resorting to conventional methods, such as drugs and lasers. Others have compared clear lens extraction with trabeculectomy or iridotomy. Most have reported successful outcomes with this surgical modality, in terms of intraocular pressure control, reduction in the number of glaucoma medications, opening of the anterior chamber angle, visual gain, and improvement in quality of life. Unfortunately, the studies on clear lens extraction are hampered by both positive and negative aspects in their execution. This review was undertaken to debate the points presented in the studies in order to have a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of clear lens extraction in primary angle-closure disease.","PeriodicalId":90077,"journal":{"name":"US ophthalmic review","volume":"66 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clear Lens Extraction in Primary Angle-closure Disease—Pros and Cons\",\"authors\":\"S. Ahmad, Ghuncha Khatoon, Iram Jahan, Naeem Arafat, Anwar Husain, Tooba Hayat\",\"doi\":\"10.17925/usor.2020.13.1.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cataract extraction for management of primary angle-closure disease has been successfully practiced for many years. However, the extraction of a clear lens for glaucoma management, when visual symptoms are minimal, is a controversial subject. A few studies have reported on the outcomes of clear lens extraction without resorting to conventional methods, such as drugs and lasers. Others have compared clear lens extraction with trabeculectomy or iridotomy. Most have reported successful outcomes with this surgical modality, in terms of intraocular pressure control, reduction in the number of glaucoma medications, opening of the anterior chamber angle, visual gain, and improvement in quality of life. Unfortunately, the studies on clear lens extraction are hampered by both positive and negative aspects in their execution. This review was undertaken to debate the points presented in the studies in order to have a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of clear lens extraction in primary angle-closure disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"US ophthalmic review\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"US ophthalmic review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17925/usor.2020.13.1.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US ophthalmic review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/usor.2020.13.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

白内障摘出治疗原发性闭角症已成功实践多年。然而,在视力症状轻微的情况下,摘除透明晶状体治疗青光眼是一个有争议的话题。一些研究报道了不使用药物和激光等传统方法提取透明晶状体的结果。其他人则比较了透明晶状体摘除与小梁切除术或虹膜切开术。大多数报道了这种手术方式的成功结果,包括眼压控制、减少青光眼药物的数量、打开前房角、视力增加和生活质量的改善。遗憾的是,透明晶状体提取的研究在执行过程中受到了正反两方面的阻碍。本综述旨在讨论研究中提出的观点,以便更好地了解在原发性闭角性疾病中摘除透明晶状体的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clear Lens Extraction in Primary Angle-closure Disease—Pros and Cons
Cataract extraction for management of primary angle-closure disease has been successfully practiced for many years. However, the extraction of a clear lens for glaucoma management, when visual symptoms are minimal, is a controversial subject. A few studies have reported on the outcomes of clear lens extraction without resorting to conventional methods, such as drugs and lasers. Others have compared clear lens extraction with trabeculectomy or iridotomy. Most have reported successful outcomes with this surgical modality, in terms of intraocular pressure control, reduction in the number of glaucoma medications, opening of the anterior chamber angle, visual gain, and improvement in quality of life. Unfortunately, the studies on clear lens extraction are hampered by both positive and negative aspects in their execution. This review was undertaken to debate the points presented in the studies in order to have a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of clear lens extraction in primary angle-closure disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New and Emerging Trabecular Meshwork Bypass Stents Current and Emerging Therapies for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Safety and Efficacy of Suprachorodial Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide: Review of a Novel Treatment Neurotrophic Keratitis: Exploring the Therapeutic Landscape iDose TR Sustained-release Travoprost Implant for the Treatment of Glaucoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1