腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:在狗尸体中使用气腹和腹腔镜提升装置的比较

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Ciencia Rural Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI:10.1590/0103-8478cr20210902
Larissa Dariva, A. L. Carvalho, L. B. Queiroga, F. R. Santos, Celeste Blumenthal Guimarães Samará, F. Molossi, A. B. Trindade-Gerardi, C. Beck
{"title":"腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:在狗尸体中使用气腹和腹腔镜提升装置的比较","authors":"Larissa Dariva, A. L. Carvalho, L. B. Queiroga, F. R. Santos, Celeste Blumenthal Guimarães Samará, F. Molossi, A. B. Trindade-Gerardi, C. Beck","doi":"10.1590/0103-8478cr20210902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the feasibility of abdominal liftfor laparoscopic adrenalectomy and compared it with the conventional laparoscopic technique using pneumoperitoneum with medicinal CO2 in dog cadavers. The total surgical time (TST), adrenalectomy time (AT), and gland integrity after removal were evaluated. Thirty-eight adrenalectomies were performed in 19 cadavers. Regardless of the antimere, the TST was significantly lower in the CO2 procedures than in the lift laparoscopy procedures (P=0.001). When comparing the techniques between antimeres, the TST was significantly higher on the left side with lift laparoscopy than with CO2 (P=0.015) and similar between the techniques on the right side of the animals (P=0.086). In the comparison of AT, regardless of the execution side, no differences were observed between the techniques (P=0.05). The same was observed when AT was evaluated separately using antimeres (P=0.902). Of the 38 adrenals evaluated, 92.1% were removed in a single block, and 32.29% had a superficial lesion in the capsule. There was no difference between the groups in the removal capacity in a single block (P=0.340) and capsule integrity (P=0.287). Abdominal lift for laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a feasible technique in dog cadavers; however, it requires a longer surgical time than the conventional technique. The traction force used to elevate the abdominal wall must be evaluated.","PeriodicalId":10308,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia Rural","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: comparison between pneumoperitoneum and the use of a laparoscopic lift device in dog cadavers\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Dariva, A. L. Carvalho, L. B. Queiroga, F. R. Santos, Celeste Blumenthal Guimarães Samará, F. Molossi, A. B. Trindade-Gerardi, C. Beck\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-8478cr20210902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the feasibility of abdominal liftfor laparoscopic adrenalectomy and compared it with the conventional laparoscopic technique using pneumoperitoneum with medicinal CO2 in dog cadavers. The total surgical time (TST), adrenalectomy time (AT), and gland integrity after removal were evaluated. Thirty-eight adrenalectomies were performed in 19 cadavers. Regardless of the antimere, the TST was significantly lower in the CO2 procedures than in the lift laparoscopy procedures (P=0.001). When comparing the techniques between antimeres, the TST was significantly higher on the left side with lift laparoscopy than with CO2 (P=0.015) and similar between the techniques on the right side of the animals (P=0.086). In the comparison of AT, regardless of the execution side, no differences were observed between the techniques (P=0.05). The same was observed when AT was evaluated separately using antimeres (P=0.902). Of the 38 adrenals evaluated, 92.1% were removed in a single block, and 32.29% had a superficial lesion in the capsule. There was no difference between the groups in the removal capacity in a single block (P=0.340) and capsule integrity (P=0.287). Abdominal lift for laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a feasible technique in dog cadavers; however, it requires a longer surgical time than the conventional technique. The traction force used to elevate the abdominal wall must be evaluated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciencia Rural\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciencia Rural\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210902\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia Rural","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究评估了腹腔镜下犬肾上腺切除术腹部提升的可行性,并将其与传统腹腔镜下使用医用CO2气腹术进行了比较。评估总手术时间(TST)、肾上腺切除术时间(AT)和切除后腺体完整性。19具尸体行38例肾上腺切除术。不考虑反剂量,CO2手术的TST明显低于腹腔镜手术(P=0.001)。两种方法比较,抬高式腹腔镜下动物左侧TST明显高于CO2组(P=0.015),两种方法动物右侧TST相似(P=0.086)。在AT的比较中,无论执行方如何,技术之间没有差异(P=0.05)。当使用反粒子单独评估AT时,观察到相同的结果(P=0.902)。在接受评估的38个肾上腺中,92.1%一次切除,32.29%的肾上腺囊有浅表病变。两组间单块清除能力(P=0.340)和胶囊完整性(P=0.287)无显著差异。腹腔提腹术在犬尸体腹腔镜肾上腺切除术中是一种可行的技术。然而,它需要比传统技术更长的手术时间。必须评估用于提升腹壁的牵引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: comparison between pneumoperitoneum and the use of a laparoscopic lift device in dog cadavers
ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the feasibility of abdominal liftfor laparoscopic adrenalectomy and compared it with the conventional laparoscopic technique using pneumoperitoneum with medicinal CO2 in dog cadavers. The total surgical time (TST), adrenalectomy time (AT), and gland integrity after removal were evaluated. Thirty-eight adrenalectomies were performed in 19 cadavers. Regardless of the antimere, the TST was significantly lower in the CO2 procedures than in the lift laparoscopy procedures (P=0.001). When comparing the techniques between antimeres, the TST was significantly higher on the left side with lift laparoscopy than with CO2 (P=0.015) and similar between the techniques on the right side of the animals (P=0.086). In the comparison of AT, regardless of the execution side, no differences were observed between the techniques (P=0.05). The same was observed when AT was evaluated separately using antimeres (P=0.902). Of the 38 adrenals evaluated, 92.1% were removed in a single block, and 32.29% had a superficial lesion in the capsule. There was no difference between the groups in the removal capacity in a single block (P=0.340) and capsule integrity (P=0.287). Abdominal lift for laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a feasible technique in dog cadavers; however, it requires a longer surgical time than the conventional technique. The traction force used to elevate the abdominal wall must be evaluated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ciencia Rural
Ciencia Rural AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Ciência Rural is to publish the results of original research, note and reviews which contribute significantly to knowledge in Agricultural Sciences. Preference will be given to original articles that develop news concepts or experimental approaches and are not merely repositories of scientific data. The decison of acceptance for publication lies with the Editors and is based on the recommendations of Editorial Comission, Area Committee and/ or ad hoc reviewers. The editors and reviewers are external to the institution.
期刊最新文献
Antibiosis of strawberry genotypes to the spotted spider mite Intra-articular stabilization of a dog stifle with polyester thread: an ex vivo evaluation Seed sensor position on seeder performance at varying speeds Physicochemical characterization of fruits, biometry and dormancy of marula seeds Amitraz poisoning in a cat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1