通过针对雇主期望的电子投资组合提高毕业生的就业能力:系统的范围审查

L. Mitchell, Chris Campbell, M. Somerville, E. Cardell, Lauren E. Williams
{"title":"通过针对雇主期望的电子投资组合提高毕业生的就业能力:系统的范围审查","authors":"L. Mitchell, Chris Campbell, M. Somerville, E. Cardell, Lauren E. Williams","doi":"10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no2art1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic portfolios (ePortfolios) are increasingly being used in university degrees to showcase graduate employability. However, evidence on employers’ views and use of ePortfolios has not been synthesised. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence on employer, industry representative and university educator views on the use of ePortfolios in recruiting graduates, including recommended ePortfolio content. Six databases were searched to identify original research on views and utilisation of ePortfolios published since 2000. Studies were screened in duplicate, and the full texts of 163 articles reviewed. Included studies were synthesised to reveal common themes. The 17 included studies represented a range of industries and most were conducted in the USA (n=10). Awareness of ePortfolios was low, as was use within recruitment. Perceived advantages of ePortfolios in recruitment included showcasing key skills/work; ability to comprehensively assess and differentiate between candidates quickly; and accessibility. The main disadvantages were the time taken to review, excessive information and establishing authenticity. Recommended ePortfolios content included samples of professional work, reflections, videos and photos. Inclusion of typical resume content, work experience, skills, transcripts, certificates, references, supervisor evaluations were important, as was a clear and concise structure.","PeriodicalId":37004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing graduate employability through targeting ePortfolios to employer expectations: A systematic scoping review\",\"authors\":\"L. Mitchell, Chris Campbell, M. Somerville, E. Cardell, Lauren E. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no2art1003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electronic portfolios (ePortfolios) are increasingly being used in university degrees to showcase graduate employability. However, evidence on employers’ views and use of ePortfolios has not been synthesised. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence on employer, industry representative and university educator views on the use of ePortfolios in recruiting graduates, including recommended ePortfolio content. Six databases were searched to identify original research on views and utilisation of ePortfolios published since 2000. Studies were screened in duplicate, and the full texts of 163 articles reviewed. Included studies were synthesised to reveal common themes. The 17 included studies represented a range of industries and most were conducted in the USA (n=10). Awareness of ePortfolios was low, as was use within recruitment. Perceived advantages of ePortfolios in recruitment included showcasing key skills/work; ability to comprehensively assess and differentiate between candidates quickly; and accessibility. The main disadvantages were the time taken to review, excessive information and establishing authenticity. Recommended ePortfolios content included samples of professional work, reflections, videos and photos. Inclusion of typical resume content, work experience, skills, transcripts, certificates, references, supervisor evaluations were important, as was a clear and concise structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no2art1003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no2art1003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

电子档案越来越多地用于大学学位,以展示毕业生的就业能力。然而,关于雇主的观点和使用电子投资组合的证据尚未得到综合。本研究旨在系统地回顾雇主、行业代表和大学教育工作者在招聘毕业生时使用电子档案的观点,包括推荐的电子档案内容。检索了六个数据库,以确定自2000年以来发表的关于电子作品集的观点和利用的原始研究。研究分为两份进行筛选,并审查了163篇文章的全文。纳入的研究被综合起来以揭示共同的主题。纳入的17项研究代表了一系列行业,大多数是在美国进行的(n=10)。对电子投资组合的认识很低,在招聘中的使用也很低。认为电子档案在招聘中的优势包括展示关键技能/工作;具备快速综合评估和区分候选人的能力;和可访问性。主要的缺点是花费时间审查,信息过多和建立真实性。推荐的电子作品集内容包括专业作品样本、反思、视频和照片。包括典型的简历内容,工作经验,技能,成绩单,证书,推荐信,主管评价,以及清晰简洁的结构都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing graduate employability through targeting ePortfolios to employer expectations: A systematic scoping review
Electronic portfolios (ePortfolios) are increasingly being used in university degrees to showcase graduate employability. However, evidence on employers’ views and use of ePortfolios has not been synthesised. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence on employer, industry representative and university educator views on the use of ePortfolios in recruiting graduates, including recommended ePortfolio content. Six databases were searched to identify original research on views and utilisation of ePortfolios published since 2000. Studies were screened in duplicate, and the full texts of 163 articles reviewed. Included studies were synthesised to reveal common themes. The 17 included studies represented a range of industries and most were conducted in the USA (n=10). Awareness of ePortfolios was low, as was use within recruitment. Perceived advantages of ePortfolios in recruitment included showcasing key skills/work; ability to comprehensively assess and differentiate between candidates quickly; and accessibility. The main disadvantages were the time taken to review, excessive information and establishing authenticity. Recommended ePortfolios content included samples of professional work, reflections, videos and photos. Inclusion of typical resume content, work experience, skills, transcripts, certificates, references, supervisor evaluations were important, as was a clear and concise structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
External aspects that stand out in the self-perceived employability of engineering students and recent graduates The nexus of work integrated learning and skills among engineering students in Nigerian Universities: A structural equation model approach External aspects that stand out in the self-perceived employability of engineering students and recent graduates The nexus of work integrated learning and skills among engineering students in Nigerian Universities: A structural equation model approach Exploring the role of generic competencies in employability and academic performance of students of psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1