秩序混乱:公共政策研究的四种方法论方法

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica-RECP Pub Date : 2021-07-26 DOI:10.21308/recp.56.07
Alejandro Hernández-Luis, Camila Carrasco, Sarai García-Guerra
{"title":"秩序混乱:公共政策研究的四种方法论方法","authors":"Alejandro Hernández-Luis, Camila Carrasco, Sarai García-Guerra","doi":"10.21308/recp.56.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public policy analysis (PPA) is a disciplinary field where multiple theories and methodological procedures converge. This research note addresses whether it is possible to organize knowledge in a way that philosophical assumptions, analytical frameworks and methods could be aligned. To this aim, Patrick Jackson’s typology is used as an organizational scheme of the debates in philosophy of science. Based on this, we propose a distribution of PPA macro theories in corre-spondence with the four methodologies defined in Jackson’s scheme: neopositivism, realism, analyticism and reflexivity. The purpose of this exercise is to make PPA theoretical proposals more accessible for researchers and, this way, to highlight their distinctive elements and prac-tical implications for research methodologies. This will allow to visualize the potential paths that could lead towards more consistent, coherent and congruent research designs.","PeriodicalId":43142,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica-RECP","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ordenando el caos: cuatro enfoques metodológicos para investigar en políticas públicas\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Hernández-Luis, Camila Carrasco, Sarai García-Guerra\",\"doi\":\"10.21308/recp.56.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public policy analysis (PPA) is a disciplinary field where multiple theories and methodological procedures converge. This research note addresses whether it is possible to organize knowledge in a way that philosophical assumptions, analytical frameworks and methods could be aligned. To this aim, Patrick Jackson’s typology is used as an organizational scheme of the debates in philosophy of science. Based on this, we propose a distribution of PPA macro theories in corre-spondence with the four methodologies defined in Jackson’s scheme: neopositivism, realism, analyticism and reflexivity. The purpose of this exercise is to make PPA theoretical proposals more accessible for researchers and, this way, to highlight their distinctive elements and prac-tical implications for research methodologies. This will allow to visualize the potential paths that could lead towards more consistent, coherent and congruent research designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica-RECP\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica-RECP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.56.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica-RECP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.56.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

公共政策分析(PPA)是一个学科领域,其中多种理论和方法程序的融合。本研究报告探讨了是否有可能以一种哲学假设、分析框架和方法可以一致的方式组织知识。为此,帕特里克·杰克逊的类型学被用作科学哲学辩论的组织方案。在此基础上,我们提出了与杰克逊方案中定义的四种方法论相对应的PPA宏观理论分布:新实证主义、现实主义、分析主义和反思性。这项工作的目的是使PPA理论建议更容易为研究人员所接受,并通过这种方式,突出其独特的元素和对研究方法的实际影响。这将允许可视化可能导致更一致,连贯和一致的研究设计的潜在路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ordenando el caos: cuatro enfoques metodológicos para investigar en políticas públicas
Public policy analysis (PPA) is a disciplinary field where multiple theories and methodological procedures converge. This research note addresses whether it is possible to organize knowledge in a way that philosophical assumptions, analytical frameworks and methods could be aligned. To this aim, Patrick Jackson’s typology is used as an organizational scheme of the debates in philosophy of science. Based on this, we propose a distribution of PPA macro theories in corre-spondence with the four methodologies defined in Jackson’s scheme: neopositivism, realism, analyticism and reflexivity. The purpose of this exercise is to make PPA theoretical proposals more accessible for researchers and, this way, to highlight their distinctive elements and prac-tical implications for research methodologies. This will allow to visualize the potential paths that could lead towards more consistent, coherent and congruent research designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
El discurso político de la dictadura cívico-militar chilena Seguro de desempleo: Una política de rescate social ante las consecuencias laborales de la pandemia en Guatemala. Participación y liderazgo de las y los legisladores en la agenda de género del primer Congreso paritario de LXXV legislatura de Nuevo León, México. 2018-2020 Un ascenso al gobierno en medio de una crisis del sistema político: La trayectoria del Frente Amplio chileno y sus limitaciones La Cuarta transformación y el Neocorporativismo. Impacto de la reforma laboral sobre el núcleo del sistema político mexicano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1