以色列/巴勒斯坦的一国现实:对欧洲和其他对建设性冲突转变感兴趣的各方的挑战

M. Asseburg
{"title":"以色列/巴勒斯坦的一国现实:对欧洲和其他对建设性冲突转变感兴趣的各方的挑战","authors":"M. Asseburg","doi":"10.20542/2307-1494-2021-2-96-109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past three decades, a one-state reality with unequal rights has become entrenched in Israel/Palestine. It has thus become conspicuous that the approach agreed upon in Oslo in the mid-1990s has failed to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This has accentuated the dilemmas of Europe’s approach to advance Israeli-Palestinian peace. The EU and its member states have continued to entertain the mantras of a negotiated two-state solution and intra-Palestinian reconciliation – while remaining in the back seat when it comes to shaping dynamics on the ground and erecting hurdles for themselves to make progress towards reconciliation. As a consequence, the chasm between European rhetoric on conflict resolution and conflict realities on the ground has ever more widened. The article analyzes European policy objectives and instruments concerning Israel/Palestine and explains why the Europeans have not been able to assume a more prominent and effective role with regards to realizing their proclaimed objectives. It also discusses prospects for European policy making on Israel/Palestine as well as options for cooperative or complementary approaches with other international actors, such as Russia.","PeriodicalId":34887,"journal":{"name":"Puti k miru i bezopasnosti","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The one-state reality in Israel/Palestine: a challenge for Europe and other parties interested in constructive conflict transformation\",\"authors\":\"M. Asseburg\",\"doi\":\"10.20542/2307-1494-2021-2-96-109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past three decades, a one-state reality with unequal rights has become entrenched in Israel/Palestine. It has thus become conspicuous that the approach agreed upon in Oslo in the mid-1990s has failed to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This has accentuated the dilemmas of Europe’s approach to advance Israeli-Palestinian peace. The EU and its member states have continued to entertain the mantras of a negotiated two-state solution and intra-Palestinian reconciliation – while remaining in the back seat when it comes to shaping dynamics on the ground and erecting hurdles for themselves to make progress towards reconciliation. As a consequence, the chasm between European rhetoric on conflict resolution and conflict realities on the ground has ever more widened. The article analyzes European policy objectives and instruments concerning Israel/Palestine and explains why the Europeans have not been able to assume a more prominent and effective role with regards to realizing their proclaimed objectives. It also discusses prospects for European policy making on Israel/Palestine as well as options for cooperative or complementary approaches with other international actors, such as Russia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Puti k miru i bezopasnosti\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Puti k miru i bezopasnosti\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2021-2-96-109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Puti k miru i bezopasnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2021-2-96-109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的三十年里,一个国家的不平等权利已经在以色列和巴勒斯坦根深蒂固。因此,显而易见的是,上世纪90年代中期在奥斯陆达成的协议未能解决巴以冲突。这使欧洲推进以色列-巴勒斯坦和平的做法更加进退两难。欧盟及其成员国继续对谈判达成的两国解决方案和巴勒斯坦内部和解念念不挂,但当涉及到塑造实地动态和为自己在和解方面取得进展设置障碍时,他们却处于次要地位。其结果是,欧洲关于解决冲突的言论与实地冲突现实之间的鸿沟越来越大。本文分析了欧洲关于以色列/巴勒斯坦的政策目标和工具,并解释了为什么欧洲人在实现其宣布的目标方面未能发挥更突出和有效的作用。报告还讨论了欧洲在以色列/巴勒斯坦问题上制定政策的前景,以及与俄罗斯等其他国际行为体采取合作或互补方式的备选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The one-state reality in Israel/Palestine: a challenge for Europe and other parties interested in constructive conflict transformation
Over the past three decades, a one-state reality with unequal rights has become entrenched in Israel/Palestine. It has thus become conspicuous that the approach agreed upon in Oslo in the mid-1990s has failed to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This has accentuated the dilemmas of Europe’s approach to advance Israeli-Palestinian peace. The EU and its member states have continued to entertain the mantras of a negotiated two-state solution and intra-Palestinian reconciliation – while remaining in the back seat when it comes to shaping dynamics on the ground and erecting hurdles for themselves to make progress towards reconciliation. As a consequence, the chasm between European rhetoric on conflict resolution and conflict realities on the ground has ever more widened. The article analyzes European policy objectives and instruments concerning Israel/Palestine and explains why the Europeans have not been able to assume a more prominent and effective role with regards to realizing their proclaimed objectives. It also discusses prospects for European policy making on Israel/Palestine as well as options for cooperative or complementary approaches with other international actors, such as Russia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Syria crisis in Turkey’s foreign policy Western military assistance and arms transfers to Ukraine in 2022 – early 2023: key trends Earthquake in Turkey: impact on domestic politics and the May 2023 elections Evolution of the Iran-Israel relations in the context of the Syria crisis The current state of the Kosovo status issue: normalization of relations without conflict resolution?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1