印度奥里萨邦高地土著的维度

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Asian Ethnology Pub Date : 2014-06-30 DOI:10.18874/AE.73.1-2.03
P. Berger
{"title":"印度奥里萨邦高地土著的维度","authors":"P. Berger","doi":"10.18874/AE.73.1-2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes and analyzes forms of indigeneity with reference to a highland community in Odisha called Gadaba. Three types of indigeneity are distinguished: indigenous indigeneity, ascribed indigeneity, and claimed indigeneity. The first concerns local sacrificial practices through which indigeneity is constructed. Significantly, this type of indigeneity is local, symmetric, relational, and the Gadaba are themselves the creators of this representation. Different forms of ascribed indigeneity, by contrast, assign indigeneity to the Gadaba unilaterally, and the relationship between those who ascribe and the Gadaba is asymmetrical and monolithic. The third type of indigeneity is as yet in a nascent state as only a few Gadaba voice an indigenous identity in the larger political field of the state, and no cultural performances are referred to nor do political organizations exist to support such a claim.","PeriodicalId":53972,"journal":{"name":"Asian Ethnology","volume":"73 1","pages":"19-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensions of Indigeneity in Highland Odisha, India\",\"authors\":\"P. Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.18874/AE.73.1-2.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes and analyzes forms of indigeneity with reference to a highland community in Odisha called Gadaba. Three types of indigeneity are distinguished: indigenous indigeneity, ascribed indigeneity, and claimed indigeneity. The first concerns local sacrificial practices through which indigeneity is constructed. Significantly, this type of indigeneity is local, symmetric, relational, and the Gadaba are themselves the creators of this representation. Different forms of ascribed indigeneity, by contrast, assign indigeneity to the Gadaba unilaterally, and the relationship between those who ascribe and the Gadaba is asymmetrical and monolithic. The third type of indigeneity is as yet in a nascent state as only a few Gadaba voice an indigenous identity in the larger political field of the state, and no cultural performances are referred to nor do political organizations exist to support such a claim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Ethnology\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"19-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Ethnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18874/AE.73.1-2.03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Ethnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18874/AE.73.1-2.03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文以奥里萨邦的高原社区加达巴为例,对土著形式进行了描述和分析。原住民族有三种类型:原住民族、归因于的原住民族和主张的原住民族。第一个是当地的祭祀习俗,通过这些习俗,土著得以形成。值得注意的是,这种类型的土著是本地的、对称的、关系的,而Gadaba本身就是这种表现形式的创造者。相比之下,不同形式的归属土著都是单方面地将土著赋予加达巴人,归属者与加达巴人之间的关系是不对称的、整体的。第三种类型的土著尚处于萌芽状态,因为只有少数嘎达巴人在国家更大的政治领域中表达了土著身份,没有文化表演被提及,也没有政治组织存在来支持这种说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dimensions of Indigeneity in Highland Odisha, India
This article describes and analyzes forms of indigeneity with reference to a highland community in Odisha called Gadaba. Three types of indigeneity are distinguished: indigenous indigeneity, ascribed indigeneity, and claimed indigeneity. The first concerns local sacrificial practices through which indigeneity is constructed. Significantly, this type of indigeneity is local, symmetric, relational, and the Gadaba are themselves the creators of this representation. Different forms of ascribed indigeneity, by contrast, assign indigeneity to the Gadaba unilaterally, and the relationship between those who ascribe and the Gadaba is asymmetrical and monolithic. The third type of indigeneity is as yet in a nascent state as only a few Gadaba voice an indigenous identity in the larger political field of the state, and no cultural performances are referred to nor do political organizations exist to support such a claim.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Ethnology
Asian Ethnology Multiple-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Asian Ethnology (ISSN 1882–6865) is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal registered as an Open Access Journal with all the contents freely downloadable. Please read the information on our open access and copyright policies. A list of monographs that were published under the journal''s former names, Folklore Studies and Asian Folklore Studies, appear here. Asian Ethnology is dedicated to the promotion of scholarly research on the peoples and cultures of Asia. It began in China as Folklore Studies in 1942 and later moved to Japan where its name was changed to Asian Folklore Studies. It is edited and published at Nanzan University in Nagoya, Japan, with the cooperation of Boston University. Asian Ethnology seeks to deepen understanding and further the pursuit of knowledge about the peoples and cultures of Asia. We wish to facilitate intellectual exchange between Asia and the rest of the world, and particularly welcome submissions from scholars based in Asia. The journal presents formal essays and analyses, research reports, and critical book reviews relating to a wide range of topical categories, including: -narratives, performances, and other forms of cultural representation -popular religious concepts -vernacular approaches to health and healing -local ecological/environmental knowledge -collective memory and uses of the past -cultural transformations in diaspora -transnational flows -material culture -museology -visual culture
期刊最新文献
Postpartum depression and major depressive disorder: the same or not? Evidence from resting-state functional MRI. A Specter Is Haunting Pakistan! : Nationalism in Pakistan’s Horror Pulp Fiction Dan Smyer Yü and Jean Michaud, eds., Trans-Himalayan Borderlands : Livelihoods, Territorialities, Modernities Melanie Lorie Cook and Louise George Kittaka, eds., Intercultural Families and Schooling in Japan : Experiences, Issues, and Challenges Hisako Omori, From Situated Selves to the Self : Conversion and Personhood among
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1