{"title":"食品加工厌氧污泥的沉降","authors":"A. Rodriguez-Prado, L. Ripley, J. Garcia-Orozco","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2014.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents preliminary results of settling tests on anaerobic sludge from food-processing wastewater treatment, using 2, 4, and 8 L cylinders. A sedimentation model from the literature was applied to the sedimentation data. The specific settling velocities for the 2 and 4 L cylinders did not differ ( t -test; P = 0.896), therefore the data were pooled. The specific settling velocity mean was nearly three times higher ( P = 0.027) for the 8 L cylinder (21.03 × 10 −4 ± 6.27 × 10 −4 m/s) than the pooled smaller cylinder size (7.29 × 10 −4 ± 2.32 × 10 −4 m/s). Measurement challenges were encountered while working with the 8 L cylinder. Given that tests using a 1 L cylinder resulted in sludge compression, the results indicate that use of both 2 and 4 L cylinders is feasible for lab-scale measurement of sludge settling.","PeriodicalId":54407,"journal":{"name":"Water Quality Research Journal of Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2166/wqrjc.2014.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Settling of food-processing anaerobic sludge\",\"authors\":\"A. Rodriguez-Prado, L. Ripley, J. Garcia-Orozco\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wqrjc.2014.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents preliminary results of settling tests on anaerobic sludge from food-processing wastewater treatment, using 2, 4, and 8 L cylinders. A sedimentation model from the literature was applied to the sedimentation data. The specific settling velocities for the 2 and 4 L cylinders did not differ ( t -test; P = 0.896), therefore the data were pooled. The specific settling velocity mean was nearly three times higher ( P = 0.027) for the 8 L cylinder (21.03 × 10 −4 ± 6.27 × 10 −4 m/s) than the pooled smaller cylinder size (7.29 × 10 −4 ± 2.32 × 10 −4 m/s). Measurement challenges were encountered while working with the 8 L cylinder. Given that tests using a 1 L cylinder resulted in sludge compression, the results indicate that use of both 2 and 4 L cylinders is feasible for lab-scale measurement of sludge settling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Quality Research Journal of Canada\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2166/wqrjc.2014.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Quality Research Journal of Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrjc.2014.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Quality Research Journal of Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrjc.2014.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper presents preliminary results of settling tests on anaerobic sludge from food-processing wastewater treatment, using 2, 4, and 8 L cylinders. A sedimentation model from the literature was applied to the sedimentation data. The specific settling velocities for the 2 and 4 L cylinders did not differ ( t -test; P = 0.896), therefore the data were pooled. The specific settling velocity mean was nearly three times higher ( P = 0.027) for the 8 L cylinder (21.03 × 10 −4 ± 6.27 × 10 −4 m/s) than the pooled smaller cylinder size (7.29 × 10 −4 ± 2.32 × 10 −4 m/s). Measurement challenges were encountered while working with the 8 L cylinder. Given that tests using a 1 L cylinder resulted in sludge compression, the results indicate that use of both 2 and 4 L cylinders is feasible for lab-scale measurement of sludge settling.
期刊介绍:
The Water Quality Research Journal publishes peer-reviewed, scholarly articles on the following general subject areas:
Impact of current and emerging contaminants on aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic ecology (ecohydrology and ecohydraulics, invasive species, biodiversity, and aquatic species at risk)
Conservation and protection of aquatic environments
Responsible resource development and water quality (mining, forestry, hydropower, oil and gas)
Drinking water, wastewater and stormwater treatment technologies and strategies
Impacts and solutions of diffuse pollution (urban and agricultural run-off) on water quality
Industrial water quality
Used water: Reuse and resource recovery
Groundwater quality (management, remediation, fracking, legacy contaminants)
Assessment of surface and subsurface water quality
Regulations, economics, strategies and policies related to water quality
Social science issues in relation to water quality
Water quality in remote areas
Water quality in cold climates
The Water Quality Research Journal is a quarterly publication. It is a forum for original research dealing with the aquatic environment, and should report new and significant findings that advance the understanding of the field. Critical review articles are especially encouraged.