设计科学研究的社会表征分析

Q3 Social Sciences South African Computer Journal Pub Date : 2015-07-11 DOI:10.18489/SACJ.V56I1.274
R. Naidoo, A. V. D. Merwe, A. Gerber, A. Hevner
{"title":"设计科学研究的社会表征分析","authors":"R. Naidoo, A. V. D. Merwe, A. Gerber, A. Hevner","doi":"10.18489/SACJ.V56I1.274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design science research (DSR) is a relatively unfamiliar research paradigm within the computing field in South Africa. In light of recent interest in this paradigm, this study sought to explore DSR perspectives among local computing researchers. Key theoretical concepts from social representations theory (SRT) such as anchoring and objectification were used to explore how researchers construct their understanding of DSR. A visual approach was used to administer drawing and association tasks to two focus groups; each focus group comprised around 25 participants ranging from doctoral students to experienced researchers. The focus group discussions invoked interesting complementary and distinctive associations about the process and content of DSR – anchored in dominant and conventional research practices. The results also illustrated several ways in which DSR is objectified by the researchers in drawings and metaphorical constructions. We conclude that SRT is useful for exploring beliefs about novel and relatively unfamiliar research practices. This study contributes to an enhanced understanding of how computing researchers go about making sense and assigning meaning to changing research practices. The findings are developed into recommendations for introducing changes to research practices. These recommendations can be used to direct efforts to more appropriately accommodate changing research practices within the computing community to broaden knowledge generation.","PeriodicalId":55859,"journal":{"name":"South African Computer Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"33-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A social representations analysis of design science research\",\"authors\":\"R. Naidoo, A. V. D. Merwe, A. Gerber, A. Hevner\",\"doi\":\"10.18489/SACJ.V56I1.274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design science research (DSR) is a relatively unfamiliar research paradigm within the computing field in South Africa. In light of recent interest in this paradigm, this study sought to explore DSR perspectives among local computing researchers. Key theoretical concepts from social representations theory (SRT) such as anchoring and objectification were used to explore how researchers construct their understanding of DSR. A visual approach was used to administer drawing and association tasks to two focus groups; each focus group comprised around 25 participants ranging from doctoral students to experienced researchers. The focus group discussions invoked interesting complementary and distinctive associations about the process and content of DSR – anchored in dominant and conventional research practices. The results also illustrated several ways in which DSR is objectified by the researchers in drawings and metaphorical constructions. We conclude that SRT is useful for exploring beliefs about novel and relatively unfamiliar research practices. This study contributes to an enhanced understanding of how computing researchers go about making sense and assigning meaning to changing research practices. The findings are developed into recommendations for introducing changes to research practices. These recommendations can be used to direct efforts to more appropriately accommodate changing research practices within the computing community to broaden knowledge generation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Computer Journal\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"33-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Computer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18489/SACJ.V56I1.274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Computer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18489/SACJ.V56I1.274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计科学研究(DSR)在南非计算领域是一个相对陌生的研究范式。鉴于最近对这种范式的兴趣,本研究试图探索本地计算研究人员的DSR观点。本研究利用社会表征理论中的锚定和客观化等关键理论概念来探讨研究者如何构建他们对社会表征理论的理解。使用视觉方法对两个焦点小组进行绘图和联想任务;每个焦点小组由大约25名参与者组成,从博士生到经验丰富的研究人员。焦点小组讨论引起了关于DSR过程和内容的有趣的互补和独特的联系-锚定在主流和传统的研究实践中。结果还说明了研究人员在绘图和隐喻结构中对象化DSR的几种方式。我们的结论是,SRT对于探索对新颖和相对陌生的研究实践的信念是有用的。这项研究有助于增强对计算机研究人员如何为不断变化的研究实践创造意义和分配意义的理解。这些发现被发展成对研究实践进行改革的建议。这些建议可以用来指导工作,以更适当地适应计算机社区内不断变化的研究实践,以扩大知识的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A social representations analysis of design science research
Design science research (DSR) is a relatively unfamiliar research paradigm within the computing field in South Africa. In light of recent interest in this paradigm, this study sought to explore DSR perspectives among local computing researchers. Key theoretical concepts from social representations theory (SRT) such as anchoring and objectification were used to explore how researchers construct their understanding of DSR. A visual approach was used to administer drawing and association tasks to two focus groups; each focus group comprised around 25 participants ranging from doctoral students to experienced researchers. The focus group discussions invoked interesting complementary and distinctive associations about the process and content of DSR – anchored in dominant and conventional research practices. The results also illustrated several ways in which DSR is objectified by the researchers in drawings and metaphorical constructions. We conclude that SRT is useful for exploring beliefs about novel and relatively unfamiliar research practices. This study contributes to an enhanced understanding of how computing researchers go about making sense and assigning meaning to changing research practices. The findings are developed into recommendations for introducing changes to research practices. These recommendations can be used to direct efforts to more appropriately accommodate changing research practices within the computing community to broaden knowledge generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Computer Journal
South African Computer Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Computer Journal is specialist ICT academic journal, accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training SACJ publishes research articles, viewpoints and communications in English in Computer Science and Information Systems.
期刊最新文献
Virtual learner experience (VLX) Editorial: A new era for SACJ Obituary – Conrad Mueller The Influence of Change Management Process on Cloud Transitioning Online Platform Privacy Policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1