律师不能再是勒德分子了:法律图书馆员在帮助律师适应涉及技术的新道德规则方面有什么作用吗?

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Law Library Journal Pub Date : 2013-09-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2330333
Darla W. Jackson
{"title":"律师不能再是勒德分子了:法律图书馆员在帮助律师适应涉及技术的新道德规则方面有什么作用吗?","authors":"Darla W. Jackson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2330333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In August 2012, the American Bar Association, recognizing the influence of technology, amended the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. These changes to the standards of professional conduct require attorneys to have some basic technological competence. This work focuses on specific areas in which law librarians may find opportunities to share both newly developed and well-established technological expertise with attorneys.","PeriodicalId":44477,"journal":{"name":"Law Library Journal","volume":"105 1","pages":"395-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lawyers Can't Be Luddites Anymore: Do Law Librarians Have a Role in Helping Lawyers Adjust to the New Ethics Rules Involving Technology?\",\"authors\":\"Darla W. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2330333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In August 2012, the American Bar Association, recognizing the influence of technology, amended the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. These changes to the standards of professional conduct require attorneys to have some basic technological competence. This work focuses on specific areas in which law librarians may find opportunities to share both newly developed and well-established technological expertise with attorneys.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Library Journal\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"395-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Library Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2330333\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2330333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2012年8月,美国律师协会认识到技术的影响,修订了《职业行为示范规则》。职业行为标准的这些变化要求律师具备一些基本的技术能力。这项工作的重点是法律图书馆员可以找到机会与律师分享新开发的和成熟的技术专业知识的特定领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lawyers Can't Be Luddites Anymore: Do Law Librarians Have a Role in Helping Lawyers Adjust to the New Ethics Rules Involving Technology?
In August 2012, the American Bar Association, recognizing the influence of technology, amended the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. These changes to the standards of professional conduct require attorneys to have some basic technological competence. This work focuses on specific areas in which law librarians may find opportunities to share both newly developed and well-established technological expertise with attorneys.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Law Library Journal has been the "official" publication of the Association since 1908. It is published quarterly and distributed to members directly.
期刊最新文献
Law, Artificial Intelligence, and Natural Language Processing: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to My Search Results From Stele to Silicon: Publication of Statutes, Public Access to the Law, and the Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act Beyond The Annals of Murder: The Life and Works of Thomas M. McDade On Embracing the Research Conference District Court Opinions that Remain Hidden Despite a Longstanding Congressional Mandate of Transparency – The Result of Judicial Autonomy and Systemic Indifference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1