一切为人民,没有为人民:una critica al populismo, Chantal Mouffe

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Perfiles Latinoamericanos Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.18504/pl2957-014-2021
Armando Chaguaceda Noriega
{"title":"一切为人民,没有为人民:una critica al populismo, Chantal Mouffe","authors":"Armando Chaguaceda Noriega","doi":"10.18504/pl2957-014-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chantal Mouffe’s theoretical-political work can be read from two registers. On the one hand, her proposal for an agonist democracy, capable of shaking the ossification and lethargy that afflict our mass liberal republics, is worthy of note, through an adequate processing of the conflict and an expansion of pluralism that extends citizen agency beyond traditional formats. On the other hand, the ideological bias, the inability to account for the constitutive pluralism of contemporary society and the divorce with the historical evidence of actually existing populism raise doubts about Mouffean left-wing populism as a vehicle for popular sovereignty and an alternative for radical democratization. In this last direction, this text will give an account of the contradictions between the presumptions of the Mouffean populist approach and the autocratic Venezuelan drift. Wagering on the collective construction of an expanded, post-liberal and non-populist democratization, for the challenges of the present.","PeriodicalId":44121,"journal":{"name":"Perfiles Latinoamericanos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tout pour le peuple, rien par le peuple: una crítica al populismo de Chantal Mouffe\",\"authors\":\"Armando Chaguaceda Noriega\",\"doi\":\"10.18504/pl2957-014-2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chantal Mouffe’s theoretical-political work can be read from two registers. On the one hand, her proposal for an agonist democracy, capable of shaking the ossification and lethargy that afflict our mass liberal republics, is worthy of note, through an adequate processing of the conflict and an expansion of pluralism that extends citizen agency beyond traditional formats. On the other hand, the ideological bias, the inability to account for the constitutive pluralism of contemporary society and the divorce with the historical evidence of actually existing populism raise doubts about Mouffean left-wing populism as a vehicle for popular sovereignty and an alternative for radical democratization. In this last direction, this text will give an account of the contradictions between the presumptions of the Mouffean populist approach and the autocratic Venezuelan drift. Wagering on the collective construction of an expanded, post-liberal and non-populist democratization, for the challenges of the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perfiles Latinoamericanos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perfiles Latinoamericanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2957-014-2021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfiles Latinoamericanos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2957-014-2021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Chantal Mouffe的理论政治著作可以从两个方面来解读。一方面,通过对冲突的适当处理和将公民代理扩展到传统形式之外的多元主义的扩展,她提出的能够撼动困扰我们大众自由主义共和国的僵化和麻木的斗争民主是值得注意的。另一方面,意识形态的偏见、无法解释当代社会的构成多元主义以及与实际存在的民粹主义的历史证据的脱节,使人们对穆芬式左翼民粹主义作为人民主权的载体和激进民主化的替代方案产生了怀疑。在这最后一个方向上,本文将说明穆弗民粹主义方法的假设与委内瑞拉独裁漂移之间的矛盾。为了应对当前的挑战,押注于一个扩大的、后自由主义的、非民粹主义的民主化的集体建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tout pour le peuple, rien par le peuple: una crítica al populismo de Chantal Mouffe
Chantal Mouffe’s theoretical-political work can be read from two registers. On the one hand, her proposal for an agonist democracy, capable of shaking the ossification and lethargy that afflict our mass liberal republics, is worthy of note, through an adequate processing of the conflict and an expansion of pluralism that extends citizen agency beyond traditional formats. On the other hand, the ideological bias, the inability to account for the constitutive pluralism of contemporary society and the divorce with the historical evidence of actually existing populism raise doubts about Mouffean left-wing populism as a vehicle for popular sovereignty and an alternative for radical democratization. In this last direction, this text will give an account of the contradictions between the presumptions of the Mouffean populist approach and the autocratic Venezuelan drift. Wagering on the collective construction of an expanded, post-liberal and non-populist democratization, for the challenges of the present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perfiles Latinoamericanos
Perfiles Latinoamericanos SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conflictos por agua de baja intensidad: Un caso de estudio en Aguascalientes (México) La corrupción judicial en América Latina: Ecuador en perspectiva comparada Eficiencia de la educación secundaria en México, 2010-2017: Un estudio a nivel municipal a través del análisis de la envolvente de datos Si las leyes no benefician a todas, no benefician a ninguna. Entrevista a Lucía Núñez Rebolledo Francisco Valdés Ugalde, Ensayo para después del naufragio, México, Debate, 2023, 232 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1