经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后主要不良心脑血管病事件发生率的评价,不论是否累及其他冠状动脉

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International Cardiovascular Research Journal Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI:10.17795/ICRJ-10(2)61
B. Naghshtabrizi, Z. Sohrabi, F. Emami, B. Manafi, Shafee Membari
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后主要不良心脑血管病事件发生率的评价,不论是否累及其他冠状动脉","authors":"B. Naghshtabrizi, Z. Sohrabi, F. Emami, B. Manafi, Shafee Membari","doi":"10.17795/ICRJ-10(2)61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) include cardiac death, nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), cerebrovascular events, and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) that may happen after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). Objectives : This study aimed to compare the incidence of MACCE between the patients who underwent PCI or CABG due to significant Left Anterior Descending (LAD) stenosis with and without other coronary arteries involvement. Patients and Methods : This randomized mixed cohort study was conducted on 400 patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), 200 with proximal LAD stenosis and 200 with non-proximal LAD stenosis, selected through census. Half of each group underwent PCI and the rest underwent CABG. The participants were followed at fixed intervals after the procedure and the incidence of MACCE was documented in their checklists. Then, relative risk index was used to compare the two groups regarding the incidence of MACCE. Statistical analysis was done using the Stata software, version 11 and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results : The study participants included 281 males and 119 females with the mean age of 61.36 ± 10.66 years. The results showed a significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of MACCE (31.58% vs. 3%, P = 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the effects of PCI with drug eluting stent and CABG on proximal LAD (3.70% vs. 3%, P = 1.00). Conclusions for proximal LAD stenosis. This randomized mixed cohort study was performed to evaluate the rate of MACCE in the patients with proximal or non-proximal LAD lesions with or without other coronary arteries involvement who underwent PCI or CABG. The study results revealed similar rates of MACCE among the patients with proximal LAD stenosis who underwent PCI with DES or CABG.","PeriodicalId":43653,"journal":{"name":"International Cardiovascular Research Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"61-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft on Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery with and without Other Coronary Arteries Involvement\",\"authors\":\"B. Naghshtabrizi, Z. Sohrabi, F. Emami, B. Manafi, Shafee Membari\",\"doi\":\"10.17795/ICRJ-10(2)61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) include cardiac death, nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), cerebrovascular events, and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) that may happen after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). Objectives : This study aimed to compare the incidence of MACCE between the patients who underwent PCI or CABG due to significant Left Anterior Descending (LAD) stenosis with and without other coronary arteries involvement. Patients and Methods : This randomized mixed cohort study was conducted on 400 patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), 200 with proximal LAD stenosis and 200 with non-proximal LAD stenosis, selected through census. Half of each group underwent PCI and the rest underwent CABG. The participants were followed at fixed intervals after the procedure and the incidence of MACCE was documented in their checklists. Then, relative risk index was used to compare the two groups regarding the incidence of MACCE. Statistical analysis was done using the Stata software, version 11 and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results : The study participants included 281 males and 119 females with the mean age of 61.36 ± 10.66 years. The results showed a significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of MACCE (31.58% vs. 3%, P = 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the effects of PCI with drug eluting stent and CABG on proximal LAD (3.70% vs. 3%, P = 1.00). Conclusions for proximal LAD stenosis. This randomized mixed cohort study was performed to evaluate the rate of MACCE in the patients with proximal or non-proximal LAD lesions with or without other coronary arteries involvement who underwent PCI or CABG. The study results revealed similar rates of MACCE among the patients with proximal LAD stenosis who underwent PCI with DES or CABG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Cardiovascular Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"61-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Cardiovascular Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17795/ICRJ-10(2)61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Cardiovascular Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/ICRJ-10(2)61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)包括心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、脑血管事件和靶血管重建术(TVR),这些可能发生在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后。目的:本研究旨在比较因明显左前降支(LAD)狭窄而行PCI或CABG的患者(伴或不伴其他冠状动脉受累者)MACCE的发生率。患者和方法:本随机混合队列研究通过人口普查选择400例冠心病(CAD)患者,200例LAD近端狭窄和200例LAD非近端狭窄。两组各有一半行PCI,其余行CABG。手术后每隔一段时间对参与者进行随访,并在检查表中记录MACCE的发生率。然后采用相对风险指数比较两组MACCE的发生率。统计学分析采用Stata软件,版本11,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:研究对象男性281人,女性119人,平均年龄61.36±10.66岁。结果显示两组间MACCE发生率有显著差异(31.58% vs. 3%, P = 0.001)。而药物洗脱支架PCI与CABG对近端LAD的影响差异无统计学意义(3.70% vs. 3%, P = 1.00)。结论:近端LAD狭窄。这项随机混合队列研究的目的是评估有近端或非近端LAD病变,伴或不伴其他冠状动脉受累者行PCI或CABG后MACCE的发生率。研究结果显示,在行PCI合并DES或CABG的LAD近端狭窄患者中,MACCE发生率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft on Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery with and without Other Coronary Arteries Involvement
Background : Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) include cardiac death, nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), cerebrovascular events, and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) that may happen after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG). Objectives : This study aimed to compare the incidence of MACCE between the patients who underwent PCI or CABG due to significant Left Anterior Descending (LAD) stenosis with and without other coronary arteries involvement. Patients and Methods : This randomized mixed cohort study was conducted on 400 patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), 200 with proximal LAD stenosis and 200 with non-proximal LAD stenosis, selected through census. Half of each group underwent PCI and the rest underwent CABG. The participants were followed at fixed intervals after the procedure and the incidence of MACCE was documented in their checklists. Then, relative risk index was used to compare the two groups regarding the incidence of MACCE. Statistical analysis was done using the Stata software, version 11 and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results : The study participants included 281 males and 119 females with the mean age of 61.36 ± 10.66 years. The results showed a significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of MACCE (31.58% vs. 3%, P = 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the effects of PCI with drug eluting stent and CABG on proximal LAD (3.70% vs. 3%, P = 1.00). Conclusions for proximal LAD stenosis. This randomized mixed cohort study was performed to evaluate the rate of MACCE in the patients with proximal or non-proximal LAD lesions with or without other coronary arteries involvement who underwent PCI or CABG. The study results revealed similar rates of MACCE among the patients with proximal LAD stenosis who underwent PCI with DES or CABG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Cardiovascular Research Journal
International Cardiovascular Research Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Speckle tracking echocardiography before and after Surgical pulmonary valve replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot patients: Can STE elucidate early left ventricular dysfunction? Cytomegalovirus Infection and Coronary Artery Disease: A Single- Center Serological Study in Northwestern Iran Weaning from IABP after CABG Surgery: Impact of Serum Lactate Levels as an Early Predictor The Association between PAI-1 Gene Promoter Polymorphism and Serum Serpin E1, MDA, and Hs-CRP Levels in Coronary Artery Disease The Predictors of No-Reflow Phenomenon after Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1