乌克兰新《民事诉讼法》在民事诉讼中的代表权

Roksolana Khanyk-Pospolitak
{"title":"乌克兰新《民事诉讼法》在民事诉讼中的代表权","authors":"Roksolana Khanyk-Pospolitak","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2018.50-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the representation in the court, which is one of the main institutions of the Civil Procedural Law. The article analyzes the norms of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine in the wording of 2017 of procedural representation. The genesis of this institute in the Civil Process of Ukraine, starting with the Civil Code of the USSR of 1963, is briefly reviewed. The provisions of procedural representation in different types of proceedings are compared, in particular with economic and administrative ones. On the basis of this it is noted that there was a unification of the rules of representation, which is positive in terms of the practice of applying these provisions of the law. Also the author indicates the terminology and definitions used in this institute as applied in literature and legislation; analyzes the provisions of the Code regarding the types of procedural representation and accordingly indicates that the legislation introduced, along the traditional types of representation (legal and voluntary), another type of representation – self-representation. The article focuses on the possibility of applying procedural representation in different types of proceedings – the ordering proceedings, litigation (claim) and separate proceedings, and certain categories of cases. It is noted that at present, the legislator does not foresee any restrictions of the application of the institution of representation in any categories of cases, as it was in the CPC of Ukraine of 2004. Concerning the same types of proceedings, it is concluded that the institution of representation is applicable to cases of ordered and claim (general and simplified) proceedings. But in the cases of separate proceedings, this institution cannot be applied at this time. Article received 10.04.2018","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"50-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Представництво в цивільному процесі за новим Цивільним процесуальним кодексом України\",\"authors\":\"Roksolana Khanyk-Pospolitak\",\"doi\":\"10.18523/2617-2607.2018.50-54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article addresses the representation in the court, which is one of the main institutions of the Civil Procedural Law. The article analyzes the norms of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine in the wording of 2017 of procedural representation. The genesis of this institute in the Civil Process of Ukraine, starting with the Civil Code of the USSR of 1963, is briefly reviewed. The provisions of procedural representation in different types of proceedings are compared, in particular with economic and administrative ones. On the basis of this it is noted that there was a unification of the rules of representation, which is positive in terms of the practice of applying these provisions of the law. Also the author indicates the terminology and definitions used in this institute as applied in literature and legislation; analyzes the provisions of the Code regarding the types of procedural representation and accordingly indicates that the legislation introduced, along the traditional types of representation (legal and voluntary), another type of representation – self-representation. The article focuses on the possibility of applying procedural representation in different types of proceedings – the ordering proceedings, litigation (claim) and separate proceedings, and certain categories of cases. It is noted that at present, the legislator does not foresee any restrictions of the application of the institution of representation in any categories of cases, as it was in the CPC of Ukraine of 2004. Concerning the same types of proceedings, it is concluded that the institution of representation is applicable to cases of ordered and claim (general and simplified) proceedings. But in the cases of separate proceedings, this institution cannot be applied at this time. Article received 10.04.2018\",\"PeriodicalId\":34101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"50-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.50-54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.50-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

法院是我国民事诉讼法的主要制度之一。本文以2017年乌克兰民事诉讼法中程序陈述的表述为例,分析了乌克兰民事诉讼法的规范。本文简要回顾了该研究所在乌克兰民事进程中的起源,从1963年的苏联民法典开始。比较了不同类型诉讼的程序代表规定,特别是经济诉讼和行政诉讼的程序代表规定。在此基础上,应当注意到,代表规则是统一的,这对于适用这些法律规定的实践是积极的。作者还指出,该研究所使用的术语和定义适用于文献和立法;分析了《法典》关于程序性代表类型的规定,并据此指出,除了传统的代表类型(法定和自愿)外,立法还引入了另一种代表类型- -自我代表。本文着重讨论了在不同类型的诉讼程序中应用程序代表的可能性,即命令程序、诉讼(索赔)和单独诉讼以及某些类别的案件。值得注意的是,目前,立法者没有预见到在任何类别的案件中适用代表制度的任何限制,就像2004年乌克兰共产党那样。关于同一类型的诉讼,得出的结论是,代理制度适用于命令和索赔(一般和简化)诉讼案件。但在单独诉讼的情况下,目前不能适用这一制度。文章收到10.04.2018
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Представництво в цивільному процесі за новим Цивільним процесуальним кодексом України
The article addresses the representation in the court, which is one of the main institutions of the Civil Procedural Law. The article analyzes the norms of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine in the wording of 2017 of procedural representation. The genesis of this institute in the Civil Process of Ukraine, starting with the Civil Code of the USSR of 1963, is briefly reviewed. The provisions of procedural representation in different types of proceedings are compared, in particular with economic and administrative ones. On the basis of this it is noted that there was a unification of the rules of representation, which is positive in terms of the practice of applying these provisions of the law. Also the author indicates the terminology and definitions used in this institute as applied in literature and legislation; analyzes the provisions of the Code regarding the types of procedural representation and accordingly indicates that the legislation introduced, along the traditional types of representation (legal and voluntary), another type of representation – self-representation. The article focuses on the possibility of applying procedural representation in different types of proceedings – the ordering proceedings, litigation (claim) and separate proceedings, and certain categories of cases. It is noted that at present, the legislator does not foresee any restrictions of the application of the institution of representation in any categories of cases, as it was in the CPC of Ukraine of 2004. Concerning the same types of proceedings, it is concluded that the institution of representation is applicable to cases of ordered and claim (general and simplified) proceedings. But in the cases of separate proceedings, this institution cannot be applied at this time. Article received 10.04.2018
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perspectives for the Application of Remote Justice after COVID-19 Pandemic The Rule of Law and the Welfare State: The Ways to Overcome Contradictions Concept of Guidelines of Release from Punishment EU Law in Non-EU Countries: Reflections on Ukrainian Supreme Court’s Jurisprudence on Energy Matters Situation Model of the Next Stage of Court Proceedings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1