公元1 - 4世纪基督徒身份的发展问题

Q3 Arts and Humanities Religiovedenie Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.22250/2072-8662.2021.1.15-23
Anna A. Luneva
{"title":"公元1 - 4世纪基督徒身份的发展问题","authors":"Anna A. Luneva","doi":"10.22250/2072-8662.2021.1.15-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers early Christian identity development during the 1st - 4th centuries CE. Adversus Iudaeos treatises are the main sources of knowledge about many early Christian positions. Christian writers described both themselves and the nations surrounding them in terms ἔθνος γένος, natio , populus . The term “ethnos” was important for Christian authors for dealing with inner community problems and for external relations purposes. Universal Christian doctrine did not fit any criteria of that time. Describing Christians as a “new nation” allowed them to define their place in the sociocultural system of the Greco-Roman world and to put themselves next to Greeks, Jews, and Barbarians. In the absence of a clear definition of “ethnos”, Christian authors proclaimed open borders of their “nation” and through this approach engaged new followers. Comparing themselves to Jews and abandoning all Jewish “earthly” traditions, the writers showed what was truly Christian and formed the foundations of the orthodoxy, opposed heresies and asserted that faith is the main tenet of their identity.","PeriodicalId":36158,"journal":{"name":"Religiovedenie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PROBLEM OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHRISTIAN IDENTITY IN THE 1ST - 4TH CENTURIES CE\",\"authors\":\"Anna A. Luneva\",\"doi\":\"10.22250/2072-8662.2021.1.15-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article considers early Christian identity development during the 1st - 4th centuries CE. Adversus Iudaeos treatises are the main sources of knowledge about many early Christian positions. Christian writers described both themselves and the nations surrounding them in terms ἔθνος γένος, natio , populus . The term “ethnos” was important for Christian authors for dealing with inner community problems and for external relations purposes. Universal Christian doctrine did not fit any criteria of that time. Describing Christians as a “new nation” allowed them to define their place in the sociocultural system of the Greco-Roman world and to put themselves next to Greeks, Jews, and Barbarians. In the absence of a clear definition of “ethnos”, Christian authors proclaimed open borders of their “nation” and through this approach engaged new followers. Comparing themselves to Jews and abandoning all Jewish “earthly” traditions, the writers showed what was truly Christian and formed the foundations of the orthodoxy, opposed heresies and asserted that faith is the main tenet of their identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religiovedenie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religiovedenie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22250/2072-8662.2021.1.15-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religiovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22250/2072-8662.2021.1.15-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了公元1 - 4世纪早期基督教身份的发展。乌达俄斯的论文是许多早期基督教立场知识的主要来源。基督教作家描述他们自己和他们周围的国家时,用的词是:ο θνος γ ος, natio, populus。“民族”一词对基督教作者处理内部社区问题和对外关系的目的很重要。普世基督教教义不符合当时的任何标准。将基督徒描述为一个“新民族”,使他们能够在希腊罗马世界的社会文化体系中确定自己的位置,并将自己置于希腊人,犹太人和野蛮人的旁边。在缺乏对“民族”的明确定义的情况下,基督教作家宣布开放他们“国家”的边界,并通过这种方法吸引新的追随者。作者将自己与犹太人比较,抛弃了所有犹太人的“世俗”传统,表明了什么是真正的基督教,并形成了正统的基础,反对异端,并断言信仰是他们身份的主要原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE PROBLEM OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHRISTIAN IDENTITY IN THE 1ST - 4TH CENTURIES CE
The article considers early Christian identity development during the 1st - 4th centuries CE. Adversus Iudaeos treatises are the main sources of knowledge about many early Christian positions. Christian writers described both themselves and the nations surrounding them in terms ἔθνος γένος, natio , populus . The term “ethnos” was important for Christian authors for dealing with inner community problems and for external relations purposes. Universal Christian doctrine did not fit any criteria of that time. Describing Christians as a “new nation” allowed them to define their place in the sociocultural system of the Greco-Roman world and to put themselves next to Greeks, Jews, and Barbarians. In the absence of a clear definition of “ethnos”, Christian authors proclaimed open borders of their “nation” and through this approach engaged new followers. Comparing themselves to Jews and abandoning all Jewish “earthly” traditions, the writers showed what was truly Christian and formed the foundations of the orthodoxy, opposed heresies and asserted that faith is the main tenet of their identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Religiovedenie
Religiovedenie Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
N. Berdyaev as a Researcher of the Religious Mysticism of Christianity: The Specificity of the Philosophical Approach Japanese Lotus Sūtra Tradition in Konjaku monogatari shū in Japan Religious Life of the North Manchurian City in Chinese Literature of the First Half of the 20th Century (“The Legend of the Hulan River” by Xiao Hong) Chinese Dragon as a Heavenly Omen Social and Cultural Nature of Religious Fundamentalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1