意识形态与信任:对布洛切的回答。

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Stanford Law Review Pub Date : 2002-12-01 DOI:10.2307/1229677
M. Hall
{"title":"意识形态与信任:对布洛切的回答。","authors":"M. Hall","doi":"10.2307/1229677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On first reading, I was taken aback, almost stunned, by Gregg Bloche's response to my article. It opens with a story about betrayal of trust by the physician for his dying mother and it closes with the heart-stopping accusation that I am attempting to \"remak[e] health law as a tool for limit-setting by deceit,... [which] would lead to downward cycles of anger and distrust, with tragic consequences for medicine's healing potential.\"l I wondered, what had I done to prompt this depth of outrage and outpouring of accusation and analysis? Had I forgotten what my own article was about? I immediately reread my article to make sure my memory was not playing tricks on me. Then I reread Bloche's response, several times, and thought long and hard about what is really on his mind. Here is what I've concluded.","PeriodicalId":51386,"journal":{"name":"Stanford Law Review","volume":"55 3 1","pages":"955-67"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1229677","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideology and trust: a reply to Bloche.\",\"authors\":\"M. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1229677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On first reading, I was taken aback, almost stunned, by Gregg Bloche's response to my article. It opens with a story about betrayal of trust by the physician for his dying mother and it closes with the heart-stopping accusation that I am attempting to \\\"remak[e] health law as a tool for limit-setting by deceit,... [which] would lead to downward cycles of anger and distrust, with tragic consequences for medicine's healing potential.\\\"l I wondered, what had I done to prompt this depth of outrage and outpouring of accusation and analysis? Had I forgotten what my own article was about? I immediately reread my article to make sure my memory was not playing tricks on me. Then I reread Bloche's response, several times, and thought long and hard about what is really on his mind. Here is what I've concluded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stanford Law Review\",\"volume\":\"55 3 1\",\"pages\":\"955-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1229677\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stanford Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1229677\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanford Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1229677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一次读到我的文章时,我被格雷格·布洛切对我文章的反应吓了一跳,几乎惊呆了。它以一个关于医生对他垂死的母亲的信任的背叛的故事开始,以一个令人心跳停止的指控结束,我试图“将卫生法重新定义为通过欺骗来设定限制的工具,……这会导致愤怒和不信任的恶性循环,给医学的治疗潜力带来悲剧性的后果。我在想,我到底做了什么,才引发了如此强烈的愤怒,引发了如此多的指责和分析?难道我忘了自己的文章是关于什么的吗?我立即重读了我的文章,以确保我的记忆没有出错。然后,我把布洛切的回答重读了几遍,认真思考了很久,想知道他到底在想什么。以下是我的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ideology and trust: a reply to Bloche.
On first reading, I was taken aback, almost stunned, by Gregg Bloche's response to my article. It opens with a story about betrayal of trust by the physician for his dying mother and it closes with the heart-stopping accusation that I am attempting to "remak[e] health law as a tool for limit-setting by deceit,... [which] would lead to downward cycles of anger and distrust, with tragic consequences for medicine's healing potential."l I wondered, what had I done to prompt this depth of outrage and outpouring of accusation and analysis? Had I forgotten what my own article was about? I immediately reread my article to make sure my memory was not playing tricks on me. Then I reread Bloche's response, several times, and thought long and hard about what is really on his mind. Here is what I've concluded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Does nationality affect nurses' information security participation? A comparative study in Iran and Poland. "Sorry” Is Never Enough: How State Apology Laws Fail to Reduce Medical Malpractice Liability Risk. What Is Federalism in Healthcare For? "Sorry” Is Never Enough: How State Apology Laws Fail to Reduce Medical Malpractice Liability Risk. Interrogated with Intellectual Disabilities: The Risks of False Confession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1