合伙企业法改革的陷阱:美国的一些经验

D. Weidner
{"title":"合伙企业法改革的陷阱:美国的一些经验","authors":"D. Weidner","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.281203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes the postion that, based on the United States experience with the Revised Uniform Partnership Act, the two major pitfalls in partnership law reform are a failure to learn from history and a failure to state clear, concise and coherent principles. Among other examples of a failure to learn from history, the paper discusses the continued use of the word dissolution and belated provision for limited liability. Among other examples of a failure to state clear, concise and coherent principles, the paper discusses fiduciary duty and related rules and provisions on joint and several liability. The current mixed grill of statutory forms is itself too complex and insufficiently coherent, and can be made better only by harnessing a proper blend of expertise.","PeriodicalId":83094,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of corporation law","volume":"26 1","pages":"1031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.281203","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pitfalls in Partnership Law Reform: Some United States Experience\",\"authors\":\"D. Weidner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.281203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper takes the postion that, based on the United States experience with the Revised Uniform Partnership Act, the two major pitfalls in partnership law reform are a failure to learn from history and a failure to state clear, concise and coherent principles. Among other examples of a failure to learn from history, the paper discusses the continued use of the word dissolution and belated provision for limited liability. Among other examples of a failure to state clear, concise and coherent principles, the paper discusses fiduciary duty and related rules and provisions on joint and several liability. The current mixed grill of statutory forms is itself too complex and insufficiently coherent, and can be made better only by harnessing a proper blend of expertise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of corporation law\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.281203\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of corporation law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.281203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of corporation law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.281203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文认为,根据美国《统一合伙法》修订的经验,合伙法改革存在的两大缺陷是没有从历史中吸取教训,没有阐明清晰、简洁和连贯的原则。在其他未能从历史中吸取教训的例子中,本文讨论了继续使用“解散”一词和对有限责任的迟来规定。在其他未能阐明清晰、简明和连贯原则的例子中,本文讨论了信义义务以及连带责任的相关规则和规定。目前法律形式的混合本身过于复杂,缺乏足够的一致性,只有利用适当的专业知识才能做得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pitfalls in Partnership Law Reform: Some United States Experience
This paper takes the postion that, based on the United States experience with the Revised Uniform Partnership Act, the two major pitfalls in partnership law reform are a failure to learn from history and a failure to state clear, concise and coherent principles. Among other examples of a failure to learn from history, the paper discusses the continued use of the word dissolution and belated provision for limited liability. Among other examples of a failure to state clear, concise and coherent principles, the paper discusses fiduciary duty and related rules and provisions on joint and several liability. The current mixed grill of statutory forms is itself too complex and insufficiently coherent, and can be made better only by harnessing a proper blend of expertise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The nature of profits Conclusion Investment Corporate governance How to Enhance Directors’ Independence at Controlled Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1