评估药品预先批准程序的运营绩效和财务影响

Charles R. Phillips
{"title":"评估药品预先批准程序的运营绩效和财务影响","authors":"Charles R. Phillips","doi":"10.18553/JMCP.1997.3.6.699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To present a managerial approach for evaluating the performance of a drug prior authorization (PA) program, illustrated through an evaluation of the Iowa Medicaid drug PA program. DESIGN: A before-and-after comparison without a control group. SETTING: State of Iowa Medicaid Program. PATIENTS: Iowa Medicaid enrollees (approximately 250,000). INTERVENTION: Medicaid Drug Prior Authorization (PA) Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operational and economic performance, including volume of prior authorization requests, PA program response times, PA approval rates by therapeutic category, medication utilization, and PA program savings and administrative costs. RESULTS: Overall, 82.9% of new and extension PA requests were approved for coverage. Of the new PA requests, 74.4% were approved for coverage, while 92.5% of PA extensions were approved. The average response time for new requests and extensions was 52.4 (s.d.=1 01.8) minutes. New PA responses averaged 73.2 (s.d.=119.6) minutes, while extensions ave...","PeriodicalId":50156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Operational Performance and Financial Effects of a Drug Prior Authorization Program\",\"authors\":\"Charles R. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/JMCP.1997.3.6.699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To present a managerial approach for evaluating the performance of a drug prior authorization (PA) program, illustrated through an evaluation of the Iowa Medicaid drug PA program. DESIGN: A before-and-after comparison without a control group. SETTING: State of Iowa Medicaid Program. PATIENTS: Iowa Medicaid enrollees (approximately 250,000). INTERVENTION: Medicaid Drug Prior Authorization (PA) Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operational and economic performance, including volume of prior authorization requests, PA program response times, PA approval rates by therapeutic category, medication utilization, and PA program savings and administrative costs. RESULTS: Overall, 82.9% of new and extension PA requests were approved for coverage. Of the new PA requests, 74.4% were approved for coverage, while 92.5% of PA extensions were approved. The average response time for new requests and extensions was 52.4 (s.d.=1 01.8) minutes. New PA responses averaged 73.2 (s.d.=119.6) minutes, while extensions ave...\",\"PeriodicalId\":50156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.1997.3.6.699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.1997.3.6.699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:提出一种评估药物事先授权(PA)计划绩效的管理方法,通过对爱荷华州医疗补助药物PA计划的评估来说明。设计:前后比较,不设对照组。地点:爱荷华州医疗补助计划。患者:爱荷华州医疗补助计划参保者(约25万人)。干预:医疗补助药物预先授权(PA)计划。主要结果测量:操作和经济绩效,包括事先授权请求的数量、PA项目响应时间、按治疗类别划分的PA批准率、药物利用率、PA项目节约和管理成本。结果:总体而言,82.9%的新的和延长的PA请求被批准覆盖。在新的保险申请中,74.4%的保险申请获得批准,而92.5%的保险延期申请获得批准。新请求和扩展的平均响应时间为52.4分钟(sd = 101.8分钟)。新的PA响应平均为73.2分钟(s.d =119.6),而延长的PA响应平均为…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Operational Performance and Financial Effects of a Drug Prior Authorization Program
OBJECTIVE: To present a managerial approach for evaluating the performance of a drug prior authorization (PA) program, illustrated through an evaluation of the Iowa Medicaid drug PA program. DESIGN: A before-and-after comparison without a control group. SETTING: State of Iowa Medicaid Program. PATIENTS: Iowa Medicaid enrollees (approximately 250,000). INTERVENTION: Medicaid Drug Prior Authorization (PA) Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operational and economic performance, including volume of prior authorization requests, PA program response times, PA approval rates by therapeutic category, medication utilization, and PA program savings and administrative costs. RESULTS: Overall, 82.9% of new and extension PA requests were approved for coverage. Of the new PA requests, 74.4% were approved for coverage, while 92.5% of PA extensions were approved. The average response time for new requests and extensions was 52.4 (s.d.=1 01.8) minutes. New PA responses averaged 73.2 (s.d.=119.6) minutes, while extensions ave...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Managing Congestive Heart Failure in the Medicare Risk Population Pharmacy Cost Reduction Imperative at United HealthCare Analyzing Variations in Medication Compliance Related to Individual Drug, Drug Class, and Prescribing Physician Evaluation of Blood Pressure and Adverse Effects in Patients Converted from Lisinopril to Benazepril The Treatment of Depression with Newer Antidepressants: Pharmacology and Efficacy Versus Clinical Effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1