COVID-19疫苗犹豫:误解、困扰和怀疑

Q1 Arts and Humanities Review of Contemporary Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.22381/rcp2020216
K. C. Morris
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗犹豫:误解、困扰和怀疑","authors":"K. C. Morris","doi":"10.22381/rcp2020216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the outcomes of an exploratory review of the current research on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in relation to misperception, distress, and skepticism. The data used for this study was obtained and replicated from previous research conducted by ASPE, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, Pew Research Center, and WHO. I performed analyses and made estimates regarding drivers of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reluctance, and refusal. Data collected from 6,600 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":38242,"journal":{"name":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Misperception, Distress, and Skepticism\",\"authors\":\"K. C. Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.22381/rcp2020216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the outcomes of an exploratory review of the current research on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in relation to misperception, distress, and skepticism. The data used for this study was obtained and replicated from previous research conducted by ASPE, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, Pew Research Center, and WHO. I performed analyses and made estimates regarding drivers of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reluctance, and refusal. Data collected from 6,600 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Contemporary Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Contemporary Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Contemporary Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/rcp2020216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文分析了当前关于COVID-19疫苗犹豫与误解、困扰和怀疑有关的研究的探索性综述结果。本研究使用的数据是从ASPE、Healthwatch Bexley、KFF、皮尤研究中心和世卫组织先前进行的研究中获得和复制的。我对COVID-19疫苗犹豫、不情愿和拒绝的驱动因素进行了分析和估计。从6600名受访者中收集的数据根据研究模型进行了测试。在适当情况下,对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。©2021,adleton学术出版社。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Misperception, Distress, and Skepticism
This paper analyzes the outcomes of an exploratory review of the current research on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in relation to misperception, distress, and skepticism. The data used for this study was obtained and replicated from previous research conducted by ASPE, Healthwatch Bexley, KFF, Pew Research Center, and WHO. I performed analyses and made estimates regarding drivers of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, reluctance, and refusal. Data collected from 6,600 respondents are tested against the research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate. © 2021, Addleton Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Review of Contemporary Philosophy Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Critical University Studies and the Defense of the Public University: Neoliberalism, Knowledge Socialism and Science as a Global Public Good Metaverse and Digital Twin Technologies, Machine Learning and Image Processing Computational Algorithms, and Geospatial Analytics and Simulation Modeling Tools in Interactive Virtual and Extended Reality Environments Metaverse Decentralized Governance and Networked Immersive Virtual Reality Systems, Machine Learning-based Image Recognition and Predictive Modeling Tools, and Cognitive Automation and Multisensor Fusion Technologies in Digital Hyper-Realistic Worlds Synthetic Data and Image Processing Tools, Immersive 3D and Digital Contact Tracing Technologies, and Cognitive Artificial Intelligence and Spatial Computing Algorithms in the Metaverse Interactive Environment Remote Sensing and Edge Artificial Intelligence Computing Systems, Environment Perception and Geospatial Mapping Technologies, and Simulation Modeling and Machine Learning-based Image Recognition Tools in the 3D Cognitive Digital Twin Metaverse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1