扳机会扣动手指吗?武器作为攻击性的实验测试——引发刺激。

Sociometry Pub Date : 1971-12-01 DOI:10.2307/2786192
D. Ellis, P. Weinir, L. Miller
{"title":"扳机会扣动手指吗?武器作为攻击性的实验测试——引发刺激。","authors":"D. Ellis, P. Weinir, L. Miller","doi":"10.2307/2786192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Berkowitz and Le Page hyothesis that weapons elicit aggressive behaviour was tested under the following conditions. 104 subjects were given an opportunity to shock a student or policeman confederate after receiving no shocks, 2 shocks or 8 shocks. Some subjects delivered their shocks in the presence of weapons, others in the absence of weapons and still others in the presence of weapons obviously belonging to the policeman confederate. In this study weapons were found not to function as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Instead, for nonangered students given an opportunity to shock a student confederate, weapons inhibited aggressive behaviour. Weapons also tended to inhibit aggressive behaviour among angered students given an opportunity to shock the policeman confederate. Berkowitz' explanation of the weapon's effect is rejected in favor of an operant conditioning (discrimination learning) paradigm. Language: en","PeriodicalId":76949,"journal":{"name":"Sociometry","volume":"34 4 1","pages":"453-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2786192","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the trigger pull the finger? An experimental test of weapons as aggression--eliciting stimuli.\",\"authors\":\"D. Ellis, P. Weinir, L. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2786192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Berkowitz and Le Page hyothesis that weapons elicit aggressive behaviour was tested under the following conditions. 104 subjects were given an opportunity to shock a student or policeman confederate after receiving no shocks, 2 shocks or 8 shocks. Some subjects delivered their shocks in the presence of weapons, others in the absence of weapons and still others in the presence of weapons obviously belonging to the policeman confederate. In this study weapons were found not to function as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Instead, for nonangered students given an opportunity to shock a student confederate, weapons inhibited aggressive behaviour. Weapons also tended to inhibit aggressive behaviour among angered students given an opportunity to shock the policeman confederate. Berkowitz' explanation of the weapon's effect is rejected in favor of an operant conditioning (discrimination learning) paradigm. Language: en\",\"PeriodicalId\":76949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociometry\",\"volume\":\"34 4 1\",\"pages\":\"453-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1971-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2786192\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2786192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2786192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

Berkowitz和Le Page关于武器引发攻击行为的假设在以下条件下进行了测试。104名受试者分别在未受到电击、两次或八次电击后,被给予电击学生或警察同伙的机会。一些实验对象在有武器的情况下电击,另一些实验对象在没有武器的情况下电击,还有一些实验对象在明显属于警察同伙的武器的情况下电击。在这项研究中,我们发现武器并没有作为引发攻击的刺激物。相反,对于那些没有愤怒的学生来说,如果给他们一个机会去电击同盟者,武器会抑制他们的攻击行为。如果有机会电击警察同伙,武器也会抑制愤怒学生的攻击性行为。Berkowitz对武器效应的解释被操作性条件反射(辨别学习)范式所拒绝。语言:在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does the trigger pull the finger? An experimental test of weapons as aggression--eliciting stimuli.
The Berkowitz and Le Page hyothesis that weapons elicit aggressive behaviour was tested under the following conditions. 104 subjects were given an opportunity to shock a student or policeman confederate after receiving no shocks, 2 shocks or 8 shocks. Some subjects delivered their shocks in the presence of weapons, others in the absence of weapons and still others in the presence of weapons obviously belonging to the policeman confederate. In this study weapons were found not to function as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Instead, for nonangered students given an opportunity to shock a student confederate, weapons inhibited aggressive behaviour. Weapons also tended to inhibit aggressive behaviour among angered students given an opportunity to shock the policeman confederate. Berkowitz' explanation of the weapon's effect is rejected in favor of an operant conditioning (discrimination learning) paradigm. Language: en
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The obnoxious and the nice: some sociological consequences of two psychological types. Self-disclosure to same- and opposite-sex parents: an empirical test of insights from role theory. The obnoxious and the nice: some sociological consequences of two psychological types. Self-disclosure to same- and opposite-sex parents: an empirical test of insights from role theory. The effects of interaction distance and gender on self-disclosure in the dyad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1