规范和凝聚力作为潜在冲突的适应性反应:一项实验研究。

Sociometry Pub Date : 1972-09-01 DOI:10.2307/2786500
P. Bonacich
{"title":"规范和凝聚力作为潜在冲突的适应性反应:一项实验研究。","authors":"P. Bonacich","doi":"10.2307/2786500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Prisoners' Dilemma (PD) game is a prototype of two central concerns of sociology, the problem of order and the problem of collective action, which are both types of conflict between individual and collective goals. An index of dilemma, D, is developed to characterize situations with respect to the degree of conflict between individual and collective goals. It is hypothesized that group norms and group solidarity are mechanisms groups devise to increase cooperation in PD-like situations. In an experiment using a five-person PD game, it is shown that an increase in D leads to an increase in group friendliness and in attempts by group members to define the potential noncooperator as immoral and untrustworthy. Thus, an increase in the potential for conflict within groups can lead to strengthened group norms and cohesion if this conflict is of the sort described by the Prisoners' Dilemma. This is contrary to the prevalent conception that norms arise from an identity of interests between group members.","PeriodicalId":76949,"journal":{"name":"Sociometry","volume":"28 1","pages":"357-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2786500","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Norms and cohesion as adaptive responses to potential conflict: an experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"P. Bonacich\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2786500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Prisoners' Dilemma (PD) game is a prototype of two central concerns of sociology, the problem of order and the problem of collective action, which are both types of conflict between individual and collective goals. An index of dilemma, D, is developed to characterize situations with respect to the degree of conflict between individual and collective goals. It is hypothesized that group norms and group solidarity are mechanisms groups devise to increase cooperation in PD-like situations. In an experiment using a five-person PD game, it is shown that an increase in D leads to an increase in group friendliness and in attempts by group members to define the potential noncooperator as immoral and untrustworthy. Thus, an increase in the potential for conflict within groups can lead to strengthened group norms and cohesion if this conflict is of the sort described by the Prisoners' Dilemma. This is contrary to the prevalent conception that norms arise from an identity of interests between group members.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociometry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"357-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1972-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/2786500\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2786500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2786500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

囚徒困境(prisoner’Dilemma,简称PD)游戏是社会学两个核心问题的原型,即秩序问题和集体行动问题,这两个问题都是个体和集体目标之间的冲突类型。一个两难指数D被开发出来,用来描述个体和集体目标之间的冲突程度。假设群体规范和群体团结是群体设计的机制,以增加在类似pd的情况下的合作。在一项使用五人PD游戏的实验中,结果表明,D的增加导致群体友好度的增加,并导致群体成员试图将潜在的不合作者定义为不道德和不值得信任的人。因此,如果这种冲突是囚徒困境所描述的那种冲突,那么群体内部冲突的潜在增加可以导致群体规范和凝聚力的加强。这与普遍的观念相反,即规范源于群体成员之间的利益认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Norms and cohesion as adaptive responses to potential conflict: an experimental study.
The Prisoners' Dilemma (PD) game is a prototype of two central concerns of sociology, the problem of order and the problem of collective action, which are both types of conflict between individual and collective goals. An index of dilemma, D, is developed to characterize situations with respect to the degree of conflict between individual and collective goals. It is hypothesized that group norms and group solidarity are mechanisms groups devise to increase cooperation in PD-like situations. In an experiment using a five-person PD game, it is shown that an increase in D leads to an increase in group friendliness and in attempts by group members to define the potential noncooperator as immoral and untrustworthy. Thus, an increase in the potential for conflict within groups can lead to strengthened group norms and cohesion if this conflict is of the sort described by the Prisoners' Dilemma. This is contrary to the prevalent conception that norms arise from an identity of interests between group members.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The obnoxious and the nice: some sociological consequences of two psychological types. Self-disclosure to same- and opposite-sex parents: an empirical test of insights from role theory. The obnoxious and the nice: some sociological consequences of two psychological types. Self-disclosure to same- and opposite-sex parents: an empirical test of insights from role theory. The effects of interaction distance and gender on self-disclosure in the dyad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1