欧盟法律背景下的法律滥用

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW European Law Review Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3434044
Sudabeh Kamanabrou
{"title":"欧盟法律背景下的法律滥用","authors":"Sudabeh Kamanabrou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3434044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abuse of law in the context of EU law has been a subject of some debate. In recent cases the European Court of Justice has shown a tendency towards mixing different approaches from earlier judgments. This article takes a critical view of this development. It points out that, relating to abuse in the context of EU law, two groups of cases can and should be distinguished: on the one hand, the inappropriate use of a provision of EU law, and, on the other hand, the inappropriate use of national law with the help of EU law. This differentiation has an impact on the handling of abuse cases. It is the decisive factor in deciding how to introduce the concept of abuse into the application of law. Furthermore, it affects the answer to the question if national law or a general principle of EU law is to be applied.","PeriodicalId":45752,"journal":{"name":"European Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"534-548"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abuse of Law in the Context of EU Law\",\"authors\":\"Sudabeh Kamanabrou\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3434044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abuse of law in the context of EU law has been a subject of some debate. In recent cases the European Court of Justice has shown a tendency towards mixing different approaches from earlier judgments. This article takes a critical view of this development. It points out that, relating to abuse in the context of EU law, two groups of cases can and should be distinguished: on the one hand, the inappropriate use of a provision of EU law, and, on the other hand, the inappropriate use of national law with the help of EU law. This differentiation has an impact on the handling of abuse cases. It is the decisive factor in deciding how to introduce the concept of abuse into the application of law. Furthermore, it affects the answer to the question if national law or a general principle of EU law is to be applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"534-548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧盟法律的背景下,法律滥用一直是一些争论的主题。在最近的案件中,欧洲法院显示出一种将不同的方法与早期判决混合在一起的趋势。本文对这一发展持批判的观点。文章指出,关于欧盟法律背景下的滥用,可以而且应该区分两类案例:一方面是对欧盟法律条款的不当使用,另一方面是在欧盟法律的帮助下对国内法的不当使用。这种区别对处理虐待案件有影响。它是决定如何将滥用概念引入法律适用的决定性因素。此外,它还影响到是适用国内法还是适用欧盟法律的一般原则这一问题的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abuse of Law in the Context of EU Law
Abuse of law in the context of EU law has been a subject of some debate. In recent cases the European Court of Justice has shown a tendency towards mixing different approaches from earlier judgments. This article takes a critical view of this development. It points out that, relating to abuse in the context of EU law, two groups of cases can and should be distinguished: on the one hand, the inappropriate use of a provision of EU law, and, on the other hand, the inappropriate use of national law with the help of EU law. This differentiation has an impact on the handling of abuse cases. It is the decisive factor in deciding how to introduce the concept of abuse into the application of law. Furthermore, it affects the answer to the question if national law or a general principle of EU law is to be applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Playing by its own rules? A quantitative empirical analysis of justificatory reasoning in the registered trade mark case law of the European Court of Justice - dataset Beyond Food Safety: EU Food Information Standards as a Facilitator of Political Consumerism and International Law Enforcement Mechanism When Does a Communication to the Public Under EU Copyright Law Need to Be to a ‘New Public’? Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership - Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership: Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1