在法律的这一边和那一边

M. Schwarzschild
{"title":"在法律的这一边和那一边","authors":"M. Schwarzschild","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3640723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Value pluralism is the idea that legitimate human values and goals are many, often incompatible, and not reducible to any single overarching principle or Good. Value pluralism is probably the central idea—you could say the single overarching idea—in the work of Sir Isaiah Berlin, the English philosopher and historian of ideas. Berlin’s theme is that individuals, and societies as well, have ideals and aspirations that conflict, and that therefore cannot all be fully realised. Thus a society cannot have perfect equality and perfect liberty because some people will exercise freedom to differentiate themselves, and hence to make themselves unequal to their fellow citizens. Equality or freedom may be at odds with other values as well, such as tradition, or the desire for","PeriodicalId":83257,"journal":{"name":"The San Diego law review","volume":"46 1","pages":"755"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On This Side of the Law and On That Side of the Law\",\"authors\":\"M. Schwarzschild\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3640723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Value pluralism is the idea that legitimate human values and goals are many, often incompatible, and not reducible to any single overarching principle or Good. Value pluralism is probably the central idea—you could say the single overarching idea—in the work of Sir Isaiah Berlin, the English philosopher and historian of ideas. Berlin’s theme is that individuals, and societies as well, have ideals and aspirations that conflict, and that therefore cannot all be fully realised. Thus a society cannot have perfect equality and perfect liberty because some people will exercise freedom to differentiate themselves, and hence to make themselves unequal to their fellow citizens. Equality or freedom may be at odds with other values as well, such as tradition, or the desire for\",\"PeriodicalId\":83257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The San Diego law review\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The San Diego law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3640723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The San Diego law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3640723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

价值多元主义认为,合法的人类价值和目标是多种多样的,而且往往互不相容,不能简化为任何单一的压倒一切的原则或“善”。价值多元主义可能是英国哲学家和思想历史学家以赛亚•伯林爵士(Sir Isaiah Berlin)著作中的中心思想——你可以说是唯一的压倒一切的思想。柏林的主题是,个人和社会都有相互冲突的理想和愿望,因此不可能都完全实现。因此,一个社会不可能有完美的平等和完美的自由,因为有些人会利用自由来区分自己,从而使自己与其他公民不平等。平等或自由也可能与其他价值观不一致,比如传统或对欲望的渴望
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On This Side of the Law and On That Side of the Law
Value pluralism is the idea that legitimate human values and goals are many, often incompatible, and not reducible to any single overarching principle or Good. Value pluralism is probably the central idea—you could say the single overarching idea—in the work of Sir Isaiah Berlin, the English philosopher and historian of ideas. Berlin’s theme is that individuals, and societies as well, have ideals and aspirations that conflict, and that therefore cannot all be fully realised. Thus a society cannot have perfect equality and perfect liberty because some people will exercise freedom to differentiate themselves, and hence to make themselves unequal to their fellow citizens. Equality or freedom may be at odds with other values as well, such as tradition, or the desire for
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to 'How Foot Voting Enhances Political Freedom' Is There Hope for Change? The Evolution of Conceptions of 'Good' Corporate Governance Extending Miranda: Prohibition on Police Lies Regarding the Incriminating Evidence The Vindication of Good Over Evil: “Futile” Self-Defense The Case for Varying Standards of Proof
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1