为结束剥削敞开的大门:外国人侵权法下违反知情同意的问责

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences University of Pennsylvania Law Review Pub Date : 2006-11-01 DOI:10.2307/40041306
Erin Talati
{"title":"为结束剥削敞开的大门:外国人侵权法下违反知情同意的问责","authors":"Erin Talati","doi":"10.2307/40041306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION 232 I. CLINICAL TRIALS MOVE ABROAD—BUT HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTIONS DO NOT FOLLOW 235 A. Utility of Extraterritorial Research to Multinational Corporations ......236 B. Utility of Medical Research to Developing Countries 241 C. Inadequate Enforcement of an Informed Consent Requirement Permits Exploitation 242 II. HUMAN SUBJECTS CAN ENFORCE PROTECTIONS UNDER THE ATS 246 A. Trovan Litigation as a Test Case 247 B. Judicial Interpretation of the ATS Leaves Room for Expansion of the Federal Common Law 248 1. Historical Perspective on the ATS 250 2. Filartiga and Tel-Oren 252 3. The Sosa Standard Defined: A Jurisdictional Statute Recognizing Federal Common Law 254 III. INFORMED CONSENT MEETS THE SOSA STANDARD FOR A NORM OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW 255 A. Human Subjects Protections Require Informed Consent 257 1. Nuremberg Code 257 2. Declaration of Helsinki 259 3. CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving Human Subjects 262","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"155 1","pages":"231-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40041306","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Open Door to Ending Exploitation: Accountability for Violations of Informed Consent under the Alien Tort Statute\",\"authors\":\"Erin Talati\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40041306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION 232 I. CLINICAL TRIALS MOVE ABROAD—BUT HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTIONS DO NOT FOLLOW 235 A. Utility of Extraterritorial Research to Multinational Corporations ......236 B. Utility of Medical Research to Developing Countries 241 C. Inadequate Enforcement of an Informed Consent Requirement Permits Exploitation 242 II. HUMAN SUBJECTS CAN ENFORCE PROTECTIONS UNDER THE ATS 246 A. Trovan Litigation as a Test Case 247 B. Judicial Interpretation of the ATS Leaves Room for Expansion of the Federal Common Law 248 1. Historical Perspective on the ATS 250 2. Filartiga and Tel-Oren 252 3. The Sosa Standard Defined: A Jurisdictional Statute Recognizing Federal Common Law 254 III. INFORMED CONSENT MEETS THE SOSA STANDARD FOR A NORM OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW 255 A. Human Subjects Protections Require Informed Consent 257 1. Nuremberg Code 257 2. Declaration of Helsinki 259 3. CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving Human Subjects 262\",\"PeriodicalId\":48012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"231-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40041306\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40041306\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40041306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言232 i.临床试验转移到国外,但人类受试者的保护不遵循235 a。域外研究对跨国公司的作用......B.医学研究对发展中国家的效用241 C.知情同意要求执行不力导致剥削242人类受试者可以执行《美国宪法》第246条规定的保护。作为检验案例的Trovan诉讼[24]B. ATS的司法解释为联邦普通法的扩展留下了空间[24]ATS 250的历史透视Filartiga and Tel-Oren 252。定义的索萨标准:承认联邦普通法的司法法规254 III。知情同意符合习惯国际法规范的索萨标准255 a。人类受试者的保护需要知情同意纽伦堡法典2573.《赫尔辛基宣言》涉及人类受试者的国际研究伦理准则262
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Open Door to Ending Exploitation: Accountability for Violations of Informed Consent under the Alien Tort Statute
INTRODUCTION 232 I. CLINICAL TRIALS MOVE ABROAD—BUT HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTIONS DO NOT FOLLOW 235 A. Utility of Extraterritorial Research to Multinational Corporations ......236 B. Utility of Medical Research to Developing Countries 241 C. Inadequate Enforcement of an Informed Consent Requirement Permits Exploitation 242 II. HUMAN SUBJECTS CAN ENFORCE PROTECTIONS UNDER THE ATS 246 A. Trovan Litigation as a Test Case 247 B. Judicial Interpretation of the ATS Leaves Room for Expansion of the Federal Common Law 248 1. Historical Perspective on the ATS 250 2. Filartiga and Tel-Oren 252 3. The Sosa Standard Defined: A Jurisdictional Statute Recognizing Federal Common Law 254 III. INFORMED CONSENT MEETS THE SOSA STANDARD FOR A NORM OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW 255 A. Human Subjects Protections Require Informed Consent 257 1. Nuremberg Code 257 2. Declaration of Helsinki 259 3. CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving Human Subjects 262
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Ultrastructural and Molecular Development of the Myotendinous Junction Triggered by Stretching Prior to Resistance Exercise. The Specification Power Cross-national analysis about the difference of histopathological management in Tis and T1 colorectal cancer between Japan and Korea. Law, Virtual Reality, and Augmented Reality Data-Driven Originalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1