社会边缘群体的隐私和保护

S. Karanja
{"title":"社会边缘群体的隐私和保护","authors":"S. Karanja","doi":"10.2202/1941-6008.1063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current notions of privacy protection may not offer adequate protection to persons in marginalized social groups because privacy protection is still predicated on an individual protection paradigm. Drawing on arguments advanced by privacy scholars on group privacy, and the application of the notion of group protection in data protection legislation, this article argues for incorporation of non-discrimination provisions in data protection laws and border control policy in order to enhance protection for those in marginalized social groups. It also purports that security and control of persons are both individual and group oriented and supports a similar group approach in privacy protection.","PeriodicalId":88318,"journal":{"name":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1941-6008.1063","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy and Protection of Marginalized Social Groups\",\"authors\":\"S. Karanja\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1941-6008.1063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current notions of privacy protection may not offer adequate protection to persons in marginalized social groups because privacy protection is still predicated on an individual protection paradigm. Drawing on arguments advanced by privacy scholars on group privacy, and the application of the notion of group protection in data protection legislation, this article argues for incorporation of non-discrimination provisions in data protection laws and border control policy in order to enhance protection for those in marginalized social groups. It also purports that security and control of persons are both individual and group oriented and supports a similar group approach in privacy protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in ethics, law, and technology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1941-6008.1063\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in ethics, law, and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目前的隐私保护概念可能无法为边缘化社会群体的人提供充分的保护,因为隐私保护仍然以个人保护范例为基础。本文借鉴隐私学者关于群体隐私的观点,以及群体保护概念在数据保护立法中的应用,主张在数据保护法律和边境管制政策中纳入非歧视条款,以加强对边缘社会群体的保护。它还声称,个人的安全和控制既面向个人又面向群体,并支持在隐私保护方面采取类似的群体方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privacy and Protection of Marginalized Social Groups
Current notions of privacy protection may not offer adequate protection to persons in marginalized social groups because privacy protection is still predicated on an individual protection paradigm. Drawing on arguments advanced by privacy scholars on group privacy, and the application of the notion of group protection in data protection legislation, this article argues for incorporation of non-discrimination provisions in data protection laws and border control policy in order to enhance protection for those in marginalized social groups. It also purports that security and control of persons are both individual and group oriented and supports a similar group approach in privacy protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Legitimacy Review of Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age Review of Interfaces on Trial 2.0 From ICH to IBH in Biobanking? A Legal Perspective on Harmonization, Standardization and Unification The Price of Precaution and the Ethics of Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1