保利安对破产债务人的诉讼-诉讼起源的破产影响

Fernando Silva Pereira
{"title":"保利安对破产债务人的诉讼-诉讼起源的破产影响","authors":"Fernando Silva Pereira","doi":"10.24840/2182-9845_2022-0001_0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the problem of knowing whether, if an actio pauliana is filed to contest an act performed by an insolvent debtor (or one that has been declared insolvent in the meantime), the effects of the granting of this action will benefit only the claimant creditor (who has the right to the execution of the asset directly in the third party acquirer's legal sphere - Article 616(1) CC - competing with the other creditors of the third party acquirer) or whether, on the contrary, should the object of the contested transaction return to the debtor's legal sphere, entering the insolvent estate and thus benefiting all of the insolvent debtor's creditors (principle of par conditio creditorum). In the previous legal regime, the CPEREF, there was a figure, the collective actio pauliana, which disappeared in the current CIRE, being absorbed by the regime of \"unconditional resolution\". In addition to a problem of articulation of the action of actio pauliana (singular) with the regime of resolution for the benefit of the insolvent mass (see Article 127 CIRE), there is the problem of the insolvency effects of the granting of such action. Article 127 CIRE, in particular paragraph 3 of this article, leaves doubts on this matter, and there is no total uniformity in doctrine and jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":40129,"journal":{"name":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ação de impugnação pauliana contra devedor insolvente – efeitos insolvenciais da procedência da ação\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Silva Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.24840/2182-9845_2022-0001_0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the problem of knowing whether, if an actio pauliana is filed to contest an act performed by an insolvent debtor (or one that has been declared insolvent in the meantime), the effects of the granting of this action will benefit only the claimant creditor (who has the right to the execution of the asset directly in the third party acquirer's legal sphere - Article 616(1) CC - competing with the other creditors of the third party acquirer) or whether, on the contrary, should the object of the contested transaction return to the debtor's legal sphere, entering the insolvent estate and thus benefiting all of the insolvent debtor's creditors (principle of par conditio creditorum). In the previous legal regime, the CPEREF, there was a figure, the collective actio pauliana, which disappeared in the current CIRE, being absorbed by the regime of \\\"unconditional resolution\\\". In addition to a problem of articulation of the action of actio pauliana (singular) with the regime of resolution for the benefit of the insolvent mass (see Article 127 CIRE), there is the problem of the insolvency effects of the granting of such action. Article 127 CIRE, in particular paragraph 3 of this article, leaves doubts on this matter, and there is no total uniformity in doctrine and jurisprudence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2022-0001_0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2022-0001_0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论知道的问题,如果一个行动pauliana提交竞赛行为由一个破产债务人(或被宣告破产同时),发放这一行动的影响将有利于只有申请人债权人(谁有权直接的执行资产第三方收购方的法律领域-第616条(1)CC与第三方的其他债权人收购者)或者,相反,有争议交易的对象是否回到债务人的法律领域,进入破产财产,从而使破产债务人的所有债权人受益(债权人同等条件原则)。在以前的法律制度CPEREF中,有一个数字,即集体行动保利亚纳,在目前的CIRE中消失,被“无条件决议”制度所吸收。除了将破产行动(单一)与为了破产群众的利益而解决的制度相结合的问题之外(见《破产法》第127条),还有批准这种行动的破产效果的问题。《公约》第127条,特别是本条第3款,在这个问题上留下了疑问,在理论和判例方面没有完全一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ação de impugnação pauliana contra devedor insolvente – efeitos insolvenciais da procedência da ação
This article discusses the problem of knowing whether, if an actio pauliana is filed to contest an act performed by an insolvent debtor (or one that has been declared insolvent in the meantime), the effects of the granting of this action will benefit only the claimant creditor (who has the right to the execution of the asset directly in the third party acquirer's legal sphere - Article 616(1) CC - competing with the other creditors of the third party acquirer) or whether, on the contrary, should the object of the contested transaction return to the debtor's legal sphere, entering the insolvent estate and thus benefiting all of the insolvent debtor's creditors (principle of par conditio creditorum). In the previous legal regime, the CPEREF, there was a figure, the collective actio pauliana, which disappeared in the current CIRE, being absorbed by the regime of "unconditional resolution". In addition to a problem of articulation of the action of actio pauliana (singular) with the regime of resolution for the benefit of the insolvent mass (see Article 127 CIRE), there is the problem of the insolvency effects of the granting of such action. Article 127 CIRE, in particular paragraph 3 of this article, leaves doubts on this matter, and there is no total uniformity in doctrine and jurisprudence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Press publishers' rights in the Digital Age: Challenges and opportunities for legal and policy frameworks Os contratos eletrónicos B2C Revisitando o tema da conversão do contrato a termo no emprego público: o acórdão do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo, de 8.09.2022 Deveres de Informação e Proteção do Consumidor Inteligência Artificial. Quadro jurídico e reflexões sobre a Proposta de Regulamento de Inteligência Artificial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1