来自匈牙利东北部b kk山脉的史前石材原料

Q2 Arts and Humanities Archaeologia Polona Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.23858/apa60.2022.3084
Norbert Faragó, R. Péter, Orsolya Viktorik, László Máté, Zsolt Mester
{"title":"来自匈牙利东北部b<s:1> kk山脉的史前石材原料","authors":"Norbert Faragó, R. Péter, Orsolya Viktorik, László Máté, Zsolt Mester","doi":"10.23858/apa60.2022.3084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the period of the Neanderthals to those of the Late Neolithic populations, the Bükk Mountains region played an important part in the lives of various prehistoric societies, and the varied geological history of this territory provided distinct circumstances for the production of stone implements. The major goal of our research is to outline the current state of information concerning the prehistoric use of the diverse silicified source materials of the Bükk mountains. The results of these studies are presented concerning four selected local rock types, cited in the archaeological literature as the silicified sandstone of Egerbakta, the radiolarite and hornstone (black chert), the silicified marlstone and the quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite). Except for the latter, little attention has previously been paid to studying them in detail. Our new petrographic analyses revealed two variants of the raw material from Egerbakta: a silicified sandstone and a diatomaceous detrital chert. The other samples turned out to be radiolarites. This result confirmed what was already suggested for the hornstones (black cherts), however, it has new consequences for the “silicified marlstone”. Regarding the prehistoric use of the selected raw materials, archaeological data show interesting dynamics through time. The Mousterian groups of the region used a large spectrum of rocks for lithic tools with a preference for hornstone (black cherts) and radiolarite in the southern part, and the quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite) in the northeastern part. The Bábonyian/Micoquian assemblages are characterized by a bifacial toolkit and an apparent preference for quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite). At the beginning of the Upper Palaeolithic, a new attitude appears in the region: the Aurignacian groups almost completely ignored local sources. During the Neolithization of the Carpathian Basin, the lithic assemblages of the Alföld Linear Pottery culture became more and more habituated to the locally available rock types, albeit their raw material economy was based on limnosilicites and obsidian. Another change took place during the Late Neolithic when supra-regional sources became dominant over local or regional sources.","PeriodicalId":52408,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologia Polona","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehistoric Stone Raw Materials from the Bükk Mountains in Northeastern Hungary\",\"authors\":\"Norbert Faragó, R. Péter, Orsolya Viktorik, László Máté, Zsolt Mester\",\"doi\":\"10.23858/apa60.2022.3084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From the period of the Neanderthals to those of the Late Neolithic populations, the Bükk Mountains region played an important part in the lives of various prehistoric societies, and the varied geological history of this territory provided distinct circumstances for the production of stone implements. The major goal of our research is to outline the current state of information concerning the prehistoric use of the diverse silicified source materials of the Bükk mountains. The results of these studies are presented concerning four selected local rock types, cited in the archaeological literature as the silicified sandstone of Egerbakta, the radiolarite and hornstone (black chert), the silicified marlstone and the quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite). Except for the latter, little attention has previously been paid to studying them in detail. Our new petrographic analyses revealed two variants of the raw material from Egerbakta: a silicified sandstone and a diatomaceous detrital chert. The other samples turned out to be radiolarites. This result confirmed what was already suggested for the hornstones (black cherts), however, it has new consequences for the “silicified marlstone”. Regarding the prehistoric use of the selected raw materials, archaeological data show interesting dynamics through time. The Mousterian groups of the region used a large spectrum of rocks for lithic tools with a preference for hornstone (black cherts) and radiolarite in the southern part, and the quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite) in the northeastern part. The Bábonyian/Micoquian assemblages are characterized by a bifacial toolkit and an apparent preference for quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite). At the beginning of the Upper Palaeolithic, a new attitude appears in the region: the Aurignacian groups almost completely ignored local sources. During the Neolithization of the Carpathian Basin, the lithic assemblages of the Alföld Linear Pottery culture became more and more habituated to the locally available rock types, albeit their raw material economy was based on limnosilicites and obsidian. Another change took place during the Late Neolithic when supra-regional sources became dominant over local or regional sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeologia Polona\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeologia Polona\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23858/apa60.2022.3084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologia Polona","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23858/apa60.2022.3084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从尼安德特人时期到新石器时代晚期,b kk山脉地区在各种史前社会的生活中发挥了重要作用,该地区不同的地质历史为石制工具的生产提供了不同的环境。我们研究的主要目标是概述有关史前使用各种b kk山脉硅化源材料的信息的现状。这些研究的结果是关于四种选定的当地岩石类型,在考古文献中被引用为Egerbakta的硅化砂岩,放射石和角岩(黑燧石),硅化泥灰岩和石英斑岩(元绿岩)。除后者外,前人很少对它们进行详细的研究。我们新的岩石学分析揭示了埃格巴克塔的两种原料变体:硅化砂岩和硅藻质碎屑燧石。其他的样本原来是放射石。这一结果证实了已经对角岩(黑燧石)提出的建议,然而,它对“硅化泥灰岩”有新的推论。关于所选原材料的史前使用,考古数据显示出有趣的动态变化。该地区茅斯特组使用的岩屑工具种类较多,南部以角岩(黑燧石)和放射石为主,东北部以石英斑岩(元绿岩)为主。Bábonyian/Micoquian组合具有双面工具箱的特征,并明显倾向于石英-斑岩(元绿岩)。在上旧石器时代开始,该地区出现了一种新的态度:奥里尼亚期群体几乎完全忽略了当地的资源。在喀尔巴阡盆地的新石器时代,Alföld线性陶器文化的岩屑组合越来越适应于当地可用的岩石类型,尽管他们的原材料经济是基于limnosilicites和obsidian。另一个变化发生在新石器时代晚期,当时超区域来源取代了本地或区域来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prehistoric Stone Raw Materials from the Bükk Mountains in Northeastern Hungary
From the period of the Neanderthals to those of the Late Neolithic populations, the Bükk Mountains region played an important part in the lives of various prehistoric societies, and the varied geological history of this territory provided distinct circumstances for the production of stone implements. The major goal of our research is to outline the current state of information concerning the prehistoric use of the diverse silicified source materials of the Bükk mountains. The results of these studies are presented concerning four selected local rock types, cited in the archaeological literature as the silicified sandstone of Egerbakta, the radiolarite and hornstone (black chert), the silicified marlstone and the quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite). Except for the latter, little attention has previously been paid to studying them in detail. Our new petrographic analyses revealed two variants of the raw material from Egerbakta: a silicified sandstone and a diatomaceous detrital chert. The other samples turned out to be radiolarites. This result confirmed what was already suggested for the hornstones (black cherts), however, it has new consequences for the “silicified marlstone”. Regarding the prehistoric use of the selected raw materials, archaeological data show interesting dynamics through time. The Mousterian groups of the region used a large spectrum of rocks for lithic tools with a preference for hornstone (black cherts) and radiolarite in the southern part, and the quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite) in the northeastern part. The Bábonyian/Micoquian assemblages are characterized by a bifacial toolkit and an apparent preference for quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite). At the beginning of the Upper Palaeolithic, a new attitude appears in the region: the Aurignacian groups almost completely ignored local sources. During the Neolithization of the Carpathian Basin, the lithic assemblages of the Alföld Linear Pottery culture became more and more habituated to the locally available rock types, albeit their raw material economy was based on limnosilicites and obsidian. Another change took place during the Late Neolithic when supra-regional sources became dominant over local or regional sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeologia Polona
Archaeologia Polona Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mapping Natural Exposures of Siliceous Marls and Cherts as Potential Zones of Raw Material Acquisition. The Case of the Eastern Polish Carpathian Foothills and the Rzeszów Settlement Region (SE Poland) in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Preliminary Results Workshop Places at Chessy (Seine-et-Marne Dpt., France): Contextual and Technological Aspects Workshop Places at Chessy (Seine-et-Marne Dpt., France): Contextual and Technological Aspects Re-working the Past: Evidence for Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Flint Extraction at the Early Neolithic Mines of Sussex Krzemionki in the Literature Published in the Years 1923–1939
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1