游客和旅游业凝视着摇篮山和弗雷辛内国家公园

C. Ridley
{"title":"游客和旅游业凝视着摇篮山和弗雷辛内国家公园","authors":"C. Ridley","doi":"10.26749/rstpp.154.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The natural aesthetic resource is an important element of natural and cultural heritage and an attractor of tourists. It is important for heritage management to understand the scenic attractors of tourists. Photographs of Cradle Mountain (150) and Freycinet National Park (149) were collected from a range of sources to determine whether there is a constancy of gaze between those who promote tourism and those who tour, and between the two visually distinct destinations. Publicly available images from four different sources were used to compare content attributes and mise en scene attributes between localities using Chi-square and ANOSIM. The photographs were then ordinated using the same attributes, and the results were displayed using photographic average composites. The Discover Tasmania and Google Images photographs were similar, both better conforming to advanced compositional principles compared to the Instagram and promotional images, which were similar, especially in the featuring of people in landscape foregrounds. There may be a reciprocal interaction between promotional and tourist images, rather than a one-way process. The contrasting features in the images from the two places were largely a product of the very different physical environments. However, the photographs at Freycinet were taken from several geographic locations, whereas the vista of Dove Lake and Cradle Mountain dominated all image sources at Cradle Mountain. The content analysis of the images was consistent between places, except where a feature of an artefact or natural feature created opportunity for artistic expression.","PeriodicalId":35513,"journal":{"name":"Papers and Proceedings - Royal Society of Tasmania","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The tourist and tourism gazes upon Cradle Mountain and Freycinet National Park\",\"authors\":\"C. Ridley\",\"doi\":\"10.26749/rstpp.154.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The natural aesthetic resource is an important element of natural and cultural heritage and an attractor of tourists. It is important for heritage management to understand the scenic attractors of tourists. Photographs of Cradle Mountain (150) and Freycinet National Park (149) were collected from a range of sources to determine whether there is a constancy of gaze between those who promote tourism and those who tour, and between the two visually distinct destinations. Publicly available images from four different sources were used to compare content attributes and mise en scene attributes between localities using Chi-square and ANOSIM. The photographs were then ordinated using the same attributes, and the results were displayed using photographic average composites. The Discover Tasmania and Google Images photographs were similar, both better conforming to advanced compositional principles compared to the Instagram and promotional images, which were similar, especially in the featuring of people in landscape foregrounds. There may be a reciprocal interaction between promotional and tourist images, rather than a one-way process. The contrasting features in the images from the two places were largely a product of the very different physical environments. However, the photographs at Freycinet were taken from several geographic locations, whereas the vista of Dove Lake and Cradle Mountain dominated all image sources at Cradle Mountain. The content analysis of the images was consistent between places, except where a feature of an artefact or natural feature created opportunity for artistic expression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papers and Proceedings - Royal Society of Tasmania\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papers and Proceedings - Royal Society of Tasmania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers and Proceedings - Royal Society of Tasmania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然审美资源是自然文化遗产的重要组成部分,是吸引游客的重要因素。了解游客对景区的吸引力对遗产管理具有重要意义。从不同的来源收集了摇篮山(150)和弗雷辛内国家公园(149)的照片,以确定在促进旅游业的人和旅游者之间,以及在两个视觉上截然不同的目的地之间,是否存在一种持续的凝视。使用来自四个不同来源的公开可用图像,使用卡方和ANOSIM来比较地点之间的内容属性和场景属性。然后使用相同的属性对照片进行排序,并使用照片平均合成来显示结果。发现塔斯马尼亚和谷歌图像的照片相似,与Instagram和促销图片相比,两者都更符合高级构图原则,两者相似,特别是在风景前景中人物的特征。促销和旅游形象之间可能存在相互作用,而不是单向的过程。这两个地方照片上的鲜明特征很大程度上是不同自然环境的产物。然而,在Freycinet的照片是从几个地理位置拍摄的,而在摇篮山,鸽子湖和摇篮山的远景占据了所有图像来源。图像的内容分析在不同地方是一致的,除了人工制品或自然特征为艺术表达创造了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The tourist and tourism gazes upon Cradle Mountain and Freycinet National Park
The natural aesthetic resource is an important element of natural and cultural heritage and an attractor of tourists. It is important for heritage management to understand the scenic attractors of tourists. Photographs of Cradle Mountain (150) and Freycinet National Park (149) were collected from a range of sources to determine whether there is a constancy of gaze between those who promote tourism and those who tour, and between the two visually distinct destinations. Publicly available images from four different sources were used to compare content attributes and mise en scene attributes between localities using Chi-square and ANOSIM. The photographs were then ordinated using the same attributes, and the results were displayed using photographic average composites. The Discover Tasmania and Google Images photographs were similar, both better conforming to advanced compositional principles compared to the Instagram and promotional images, which were similar, especially in the featuring of people in landscape foregrounds. There may be a reciprocal interaction between promotional and tourist images, rather than a one-way process. The contrasting features in the images from the two places were largely a product of the very different physical environments. However, the photographs at Freycinet were taken from several geographic locations, whereas the vista of Dove Lake and Cradle Mountain dominated all image sources at Cradle Mountain. The content analysis of the images was consistent between places, except where a feature of an artefact or natural feature created opportunity for artistic expression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Papers and Proceedings - Royal Society of Tasmania
Papers and Proceedings - Royal Society of Tasmania Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short note : a brief history of the Central North Field Naturalists Ecological and behavioural observations of a nesting aggregation of the endemic Tasmanian Digger Wasp Williamsita tasmanica Channel to the Strait : the geological history of the Tamar Valley–Launceston area From iodine deficiency to excess : the Tasmanian thyrotoxicosis epidemic of the 1960s Short note : Torres Strait to Tasmania: nationally significant butterfly collection housed at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, Launceston
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1