罗曼德哲学学会,从创建到制度化

Q4 Arts and Humanities Studia Philosophica Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.24894/stph-fr.2020.79012
C. Jaccard, M. Ratcliff
{"title":"罗曼德哲学学会,从创建到制度化","authors":"C. Jaccard, M. Ratcliff","doi":"10.24894/stph-fr.2020.79012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a central cultural areopagus of French-speaking Switzerland from 1906 to 1939, the Société romande de philosophie (SRP), nearly unknown to philosophers and historians alike, a blind spot of philosophy in Romandie. The spontaneous reading philosophers can make of their past as a history of philosophical theories ensues in a retrospective disciplinary unit attributed to philosophy. Yet, contrary to that view, we show that, in Romandie, this past was structured both by a disciplinary pluralism supported by numerous cantonal, intercantonal and international networks, and by a genuine unity around certain values other than the criterion of discipline. As a result, identity— and therefore belonging—was not based on philosophy as a discipline, but on disciplinary plurality as much as on the very sharing of many values. Those ranged from intellectual fraternity to taking the divine seriously, from the celebration of the homeland to federalism and the tolerance vis-à-vis divergent ideas, from the praise of living together to the search of the truth.","PeriodicalId":52747,"journal":{"name":"Studia Philosophica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La Société romande de philosophie de sa création à son institutionnalisation\",\"authors\":\"C. Jaccard, M. Ratcliff\",\"doi\":\"10.24894/stph-fr.2020.79012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a central cultural areopagus of French-speaking Switzerland from 1906 to 1939, the Société romande de philosophie (SRP), nearly unknown to philosophers and historians alike, a blind spot of philosophy in Romandie. The spontaneous reading philosophers can make of their past as a history of philosophical theories ensues in a retrospective disciplinary unit attributed to philosophy. Yet, contrary to that view, we show that, in Romandie, this past was structured both by a disciplinary pluralism supported by numerous cantonal, intercantonal and international networks, and by a genuine unity around certain values other than the criterion of discipline. As a result, identity— and therefore belonging—was not based on philosophy as a discipline, but on disciplinary plurality as much as on the very sharing of many values. Those ranged from intellectual fraternity to taking the divine seriously, from the celebration of the homeland to federalism and the tolerance vis-à-vis divergent ideas, from the praise of living together to the search of the truth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Philosophica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Philosophica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24894/stph-fr.2020.79012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24894/stph-fr.2020.79012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章介绍了1906年到1939年间瑞士法语区的一个文化中心,即社会主义罗曼哲学(SRP),哲学家和历史学家几乎都不知道它,这是罗曼哲学的一个盲点。哲学家的自发阅读可以把他们的过去作为哲学理论的历史,在哲学的回溯性学科单元中进行。然而,与这一观点相反,我们表明,在罗曼迪,这一过去是由众多州、州际和国际网络所支持的学科多元主义和围绕学科标准以外的某些价值观的真正统一所构成的。因此,同一性——以及由此而来的归属感——并不是建立在作为一门学科的哲学基础上,而是建立在学科多元性的基础上,就像建立在许多价值观的共同基础上一样。从知识分子的友爱到认真对待神,从对祖国的庆祝到联邦制和对-à-vis不同思想的容忍,从对共同生活的赞美到对真理的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La Société romande de philosophie de sa création à son institutionnalisation
This article presents a central cultural areopagus of French-speaking Switzerland from 1906 to 1939, the Société romande de philosophie (SRP), nearly unknown to philosophers and historians alike, a blind spot of philosophy in Romandie. The spontaneous reading philosophers can make of their past as a history of philosophical theories ensues in a retrospective disciplinary unit attributed to philosophy. Yet, contrary to that view, we show that, in Romandie, this past was structured both by a disciplinary pluralism supported by numerous cantonal, intercantonal and international networks, and by a genuine unity around certain values other than the criterion of discipline. As a result, identity— and therefore belonging—was not based on philosophy as a discipline, but on disciplinary plurality as much as on the very sharing of many values. Those ranged from intellectual fraternity to taking the divine seriously, from the celebration of the homeland to federalism and the tolerance vis-à-vis divergent ideas, from the praise of living together to the search of the truth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Philosophica
Studia Philosophica Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vivre au milieu de sociétés multiespèces: repenser nos relations avec Watsuji Tetsurō et Imanishi Kinji Pragmatische Vernünftigkeit und die (Nicht)Selbstverständlichkeit der Demokratie. Über die Ritter-Schule und ihre politische Philosophie Inhaltsverzeichnis Moralische Verantwortung im Klima- und Umweltschutz Perspectives smithiennes sur l’éthique de l’environnement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1