从新自由主义和自由主义的反弹中幸存下来

Q3 Social Sciences Geographische Zeitschrift Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.25162/GZ-2018-0002
M. Hannah
{"title":"从新自由主义和自由主义的反弹中幸存下来","authors":"M. Hannah","doi":"10.25162/GZ-2018-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personal experiences gained while working as a human geographer in three countries form the basis for reflections on two key areas: recent developments in the ongoing neoliberalization of higher education, and the place of critical cultural and social theory, especially as connected with newly controversial ‘diversity politics’, both inside and outside the academy. In the first case, a differentiated view of the various forms taken by educational neoliberalization is recommended, both for understanding what has happened and for discerning possibilities for an exit from further neoliberal “flailing and failing forward” (Peck, Theodore and Brenner 2012, 274). Secondly, the ‘liberal backlash’, promoted in part by academics, that blames such upheavals as Brexit and the election of Trump in part upon diversity politics and the academic cultural theory with which it is often associated, is identified as a major challenge. Academics must be active in confronting the distorted representations and harmful intellectual politics emanating from this backlash. Across both areas discussed, a vigorous defense of the value and legitimacy of critical social and cultural theory is needed.","PeriodicalId":35646,"journal":{"name":"Geographische Zeitschrift","volume":"106 1","pages":"16-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surviving neo-liberalism and the liberal backlash\",\"authors\":\"M. Hannah\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/GZ-2018-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Personal experiences gained while working as a human geographer in three countries form the basis for reflections on two key areas: recent developments in the ongoing neoliberalization of higher education, and the place of critical cultural and social theory, especially as connected with newly controversial ‘diversity politics’, both inside and outside the academy. In the first case, a differentiated view of the various forms taken by educational neoliberalization is recommended, both for understanding what has happened and for discerning possibilities for an exit from further neoliberal “flailing and failing forward” (Peck, Theodore and Brenner 2012, 274). Secondly, the ‘liberal backlash’, promoted in part by academics, that blames such upheavals as Brexit and the election of Trump in part upon diversity politics and the academic cultural theory with which it is often associated, is identified as a major challenge. Academics must be active in confronting the distorted representations and harmful intellectual politics emanating from this backlash. Across both areas discussed, a vigorous defense of the value and legitimacy of critical social and cultural theory is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographische Zeitschrift\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"16-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographische Zeitschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/GZ-2018-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/GZ-2018-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在三个国家作为人文地理学家工作期间获得的个人经验构成了对两个关键领域的反思的基础:正在进行的高等教育新自由主义化的最新发展,以及批判文化和社会理论的地位,特别是与学术界内外新争议的“多样性政治”相联系。在第一种情况下,建议对教育新自由主义化所采取的各种形式采取不同的观点,这既是为了理解已经发生的事情,也是为了辨别从进一步的新自由主义“摇摆和失败前进”中退出的可能性(派克,西奥多和布伦纳,2012,274)。其次,部分由学者推动的“自由主义反弹”将英国脱欧和特朗普当选等动荡部分归咎于多样性政治和学术文化理论,这被认为是一个重大挑战。学术界必须积极面对这种反弹所产生的扭曲表述和有害的知识政治。在讨论的两个领域中,需要对批判社会和文化理论的价值和合法性进行有力的辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surviving neo-liberalism and the liberal backlash
Personal experiences gained while working as a human geographer in three countries form the basis for reflections on two key areas: recent developments in the ongoing neoliberalization of higher education, and the place of critical cultural and social theory, especially as connected with newly controversial ‘diversity politics’, both inside and outside the academy. In the first case, a differentiated view of the various forms taken by educational neoliberalization is recommended, both for understanding what has happened and for discerning possibilities for an exit from further neoliberal “flailing and failing forward” (Peck, Theodore and Brenner 2012, 274). Secondly, the ‘liberal backlash’, promoted in part by academics, that blames such upheavals as Brexit and the election of Trump in part upon diversity politics and the academic cultural theory with which it is often associated, is identified as a major challenge. Academics must be active in confronting the distorted representations and harmful intellectual politics emanating from this backlash. Across both areas discussed, a vigorous defense of the value and legitimacy of critical social and cultural theory is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geographische Zeitschrift
Geographische Zeitschrift Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Die Geographische Zeitschrift gehört seit ihrem Beginn im Jahr 1895 zu den führenden deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften ihres Faches. Heute widmet sich die Zeitschrift in meist deutschsprachigen aber auch englischen Beiträgen den Gegenwartsfragen der Anthropogeographie. Als international renommiertes Fachmedium ist sie einem hohen theoretischen und methodischen Anspruch verpflichtet. Die Qualität und Aktualität der Beiträge wird durch internationale Sachverständige — als "refereed journal" — garantiert. Gerade indem sie die traditionellen Grenzen ihres Faches überschreitet, trägt die Geographische Zeitschrift maßgeblich zur Weiterentwicklung und Fortschritt der Anthropogeographie bei.
期刊最新文献
Aus der Perspektive der Migration Lateinamerikanische Geographien Territorium und Multiterritorialität in dekolonialer Perspektive Körper, Raum und Territorium in Lateinamerika Die Politische Ökologie Lateinamerikas im Dialog mit der Geographie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1