QWERTY键盘效应的延伸:不仅仅是右手,专业知识和打字能力也能预测单词的效价评级

Q2 Arts and Humanities Psychology of Language and Communication Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2478/plc-2022-0005
E. Buchanan, K. D. Valentine, Addie Wilkowsky
{"title":"QWERTY键盘效应的延伸:不仅仅是右手,专业知识和打字能力也能预测单词的效价评级","authors":"E. Buchanan, K. D. Valentine, Addie Wilkowsky","doi":"10.2478/plc-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Typing is a ubiquitous daily action for many individuals; yet, research on how these actions have changed our perception of language is limited. One such influence, deemed the QWERTY effect, is an increase in valence ratings for words typed more with the right hand on a traditional keyboard (Jasmin & Casasanto, 2012). Although this finding is intuitively appealing given both right-handed dominance and the smaller number of letters typed with the right hand, an extension and replication of the right-side advantage is warranted. The present paper re-examined the QWERTY effect expanding to other embodied cognition variables (Barsalou, 1999). First, we found that the right-side advantage is replicable to new valence stimuli. Further, when examining expertise, right-side advantage interacted with typing speed and typeability (i.e., alternating hand key presses or finger switches), portraying that both skill and procedural actions play a role in judgment of valence on words.","PeriodicalId":20768,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Language and Communication","volume":"26 1","pages":"85 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An extension of the QWERTY effect: Not just the right hand, expertise and typeability predict valence ratings of words\",\"authors\":\"E. Buchanan, K. D. Valentine, Addie Wilkowsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/plc-2022-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Typing is a ubiquitous daily action for many individuals; yet, research on how these actions have changed our perception of language is limited. One such influence, deemed the QWERTY effect, is an increase in valence ratings for words typed more with the right hand on a traditional keyboard (Jasmin & Casasanto, 2012). Although this finding is intuitively appealing given both right-handed dominance and the smaller number of letters typed with the right hand, an extension and replication of the right-side advantage is warranted. The present paper re-examined the QWERTY effect expanding to other embodied cognition variables (Barsalou, 1999). First, we found that the right-side advantage is replicable to new valence stimuli. Further, when examining expertise, right-side advantage interacted with typing speed and typeability (i.e., alternating hand key presses or finger switches), portraying that both skill and procedural actions play a role in judgment of valence on words.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Language and Communication\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Language and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2022-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Language and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

打字对许多人来说是一项无处不在的日常活动;然而,关于这些行为如何改变我们对语言的感知的研究是有限的。其中一个影响,被认为是QWERTY效应,是在传统键盘上用右手输入的单词的效价评级增加(Jasmin & Casasanto, 2012)。尽管考虑到右撇子的优势和用右手打字的字母数量较少,这一发现在直觉上很有吸引力,但右撇子优势的延伸和复制是有道理的。本文重新研究了扩展到其他具身认知变量的QWERTY效应(Barsalou, 1999)。首先,我们发现右侧的优势可以复制到新的效价刺激。此外,在测试专业知识时,右侧优势与打字速度和可打字性(即交替按手键或手指开关)相互作用,表明技能和程序性行为都在判断词的效价中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An extension of the QWERTY effect: Not just the right hand, expertise and typeability predict valence ratings of words
Abstract Typing is a ubiquitous daily action for many individuals; yet, research on how these actions have changed our perception of language is limited. One such influence, deemed the QWERTY effect, is an increase in valence ratings for words typed more with the right hand on a traditional keyboard (Jasmin & Casasanto, 2012). Although this finding is intuitively appealing given both right-handed dominance and the smaller number of letters typed with the right hand, an extension and replication of the right-side advantage is warranted. The present paper re-examined the QWERTY effect expanding to other embodied cognition variables (Barsalou, 1999). First, we found that the right-side advantage is replicable to new valence stimuli. Further, when examining expertise, right-side advantage interacted with typing speed and typeability (i.e., alternating hand key presses or finger switches), portraying that both skill and procedural actions play a role in judgment of valence on words.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology of Language and Communication
Psychology of Language and Communication Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The ambiguous relation between verbal irony understanding and need for cognitive closure: Reports from two studies Are Polish CLIL learners more willing to communicate in English than non-CLIL learners? Twitter language samples reflect collective emotional responses following political leaders’ rhetoric during the pandemic across four countries A star is born? The German gender star and its effects on mental representation Stimulus-response binding is not a gradually learned association between specific stimuli and their responses: Evidence from a teenage bilingual population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1