人类动物学个性研究的综合方法:六种宠物及其主人的评分

IF 1.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Anthrozoos Pub Date : 1998-12-01 DOI:10.2752/089279398787000661
S. Gosling, Allison V. Bonnenburg
{"title":"人类动物学个性研究的综合方法:六种宠物及其主人的评分","authors":"S. Gosling, Allison V. Bonnenburg","doi":"10.2752/089279398787000661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn this paper, we identify two obstacles that have hindered the integration of personality research in anthrozoology. The first of these interrelated obstacles is the difficulty of obtaining large samples in anthrozoological research. Without large samples investigators must rely on replication studies to establish the generalizability of their findings. However, the second obstacle—the lack of a standard taxonomy of personality descriptors—makes it difficult to see whether findings replicate across studies. To address these issues and to stimulate a more integrative approach to personality studies, we: (a) provide normative data for personality ratings of dogs, cats, ferrets, horses, rabbits, and hedgehogs on 50 traits; (b) provide personality profiles of the owners of these six species; (c) provide the instrument on which the pet and human data were collected; and (d) demonstrate the viability of the internet as a tool for collecting large samples of personality data on pets. We show how the nor...","PeriodicalId":50748,"journal":{"name":"Anthrozoos","volume":"11 1","pages":"148-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2752/089279398787000661","citationCount":"69","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrative approach to personality research in anthrozoology: Ratings of six species of pets and their owners\",\"authors\":\"S. Gosling, Allison V. Bonnenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.2752/089279398787000661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIn this paper, we identify two obstacles that have hindered the integration of personality research in anthrozoology. The first of these interrelated obstacles is the difficulty of obtaining large samples in anthrozoological research. Without large samples investigators must rely on replication studies to establish the generalizability of their findings. However, the second obstacle—the lack of a standard taxonomy of personality descriptors—makes it difficult to see whether findings replicate across studies. To address these issues and to stimulate a more integrative approach to personality studies, we: (a) provide normative data for personality ratings of dogs, cats, ferrets, horses, rabbits, and hedgehogs on 50 traits; (b) provide personality profiles of the owners of these six species; (c) provide the instrument on which the pet and human data were collected; and (d) demonstrate the viability of the internet as a tool for collecting large samples of personality data on pets. We show how the nor...\",\"PeriodicalId\":50748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthrozoos\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"148-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2752/089279398787000661\",\"citationCount\":\"69\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthrozoos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2752/089279398787000661\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthrozoos","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2752/089279398787000661","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

摘要

在本文中,我们发现了阻碍人格研究在人类学中整合的两个障碍。这些相互关联的障碍中的第一个是在人畜研究中难以获得大量样本。在没有大量样本的情况下,研究人员必须依靠重复性研究来确定其发现的普遍性。然而,第二个障碍——缺乏人格描述的标准分类——使得很难看到研究结果是否可以在不同的研究中复制。为了解决这些问题并激发更综合的人格研究方法,我们:(a)提供了狗、猫、雪貂、马、兔子和刺猬在50个特征上的人格评级的规范性数据;(b)提供这六个物种的主人的性格资料;(c)提供收集宠物和人类数据的仪器;(d)证明互联网作为收集宠物大量个性数据样本的工具的可行性。我们将展示如何…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An integrative approach to personality research in anthrozoology: Ratings of six species of pets and their owners
ABSTRACTIn this paper, we identify two obstacles that have hindered the integration of personality research in anthrozoology. The first of these interrelated obstacles is the difficulty of obtaining large samples in anthrozoological research. Without large samples investigators must rely on replication studies to establish the generalizability of their findings. However, the second obstacle—the lack of a standard taxonomy of personality descriptors—makes it difficult to see whether findings replicate across studies. To address these issues and to stimulate a more integrative approach to personality studies, we: (a) provide normative data for personality ratings of dogs, cats, ferrets, horses, rabbits, and hedgehogs on 50 traits; (b) provide personality profiles of the owners of these six species; (c) provide the instrument on which the pet and human data were collected; and (d) demonstrate the viability of the internet as a tool for collecting large samples of personality data on pets. We show how the nor...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthrozoos
Anthrozoos 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: A vital forum for academic dialogue on human-animal relations, Anthrozoös is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that has enjoyed a distinguished history as a pioneer in the field since its launch in 1987. The key premise of Anthrozoös is to address the characteristics and consequences of interactions and relationships between people and non-human animals across areas as varied as anthropology, ethology, medicine, psychology, veterinary medicine and zoology. Articles therefore cover the full range of human–animal relations, from their treatment in the arts and humanities, through to behavioral, biological, social and health sciences.
期刊最新文献
A Cross-Cultural Study of Veterinarians’ Attitudes to the Euthanasia of Companion Animals An Evaluation of a Canine Welfare Education Intervention for Primary School Children Exploring Animal Abuse Proclivity, Everyday Sadism, and Attitudes Toward Animals in Cyprus “Has an Ugly Caw”: The Moral Implications of How Hunting Organizations Depict Nonhuman Animals A Preliminary Analysis of Psychiatric Service Dog Placements and Sleep Patterns of Partners of Veterans with PTSD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1